Last visit was: 12 Dec 2024, 20:54 It is currently 12 Dec 2024, 20:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,851
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,255
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,851
Kudos: 685,420
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
divyadna
Joined: 21 Dec 2021
Last visit: 30 Jan 2024
Posts: 320
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 242
Posts: 320
Kudos: 266
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kungfury42
Joined: 07 Jan 2022
Last visit: 31 May 2023
Posts: 583
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 725
Schools: NUS '25 (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
Products:
Schools: NUS '25 (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 583
Kudos: 466
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
PVOG
Joined: 18 May 2022
Last visit: 09 Nov 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
WE:Corporate Finance (Accounting)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
Posts: 21
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey guys, slightly confused with the wording on this one. Although its a pretty easy question computationally, I was a bit confused about what each "term" means.

E.g. Why isn't the first term not defined by a0, where you have 1-0 = 0 = a0

and then a1 = 2, a2=5, etc..

Why are we not including the possibility that n=0, and this is the first term?

Because had we done this, the answer would be such that the difference between the 4th term (in the sequence including a0, where a0 is the starting point) and the third term is 18-5 = 13.

Please could someone highlight where my logic is incorrect, because I had actually started this question off by computing a0 and saying that a0 is the first term in the sequence, which made the 4th term 18 and the 3rd term 5 (instead of 65 and 18 respectively if we had NOT included a0 as the first term and instead started with a1 as the first term, which the correct answer does).
User avatar
ThatDudeKnows
Joined: 11 May 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,078
Own Kudos:
805
 []
Given Kudos: 79
Expert reply
Posts: 1,078
Kudos: 805
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PVOG
Hey guys, slightly confused with the wording on this one. Although its a pretty easy question computationally, I was a bit confused about what each "term" means.

E.g. Why isn't the first term not defined by a0, where you have 1-0 = 0 = a0

and then a1 = 2, a2=5, etc..

Why are we not including the possibility that n=0, and this is the first term?

Because had we done this, the answer would be such that the difference between the 4th term (in the sequence including a0, where a0 is the starting point) and the third term is 18-5 = 13.

Please could someone highlight where my logic is incorrect, because I had actually started this question off by computing a0 and saying that a0 is the first term in the sequence, which made the 4th term 18 and the 3rd term 5 (instead of 65 and 18 respectively if we had NOT included a0 as the first term and instead started with a1 as the first term, which the correct answer does).

Hi PVOG,
I agree with you. Note that this is not an official GMAC question, so there's definitely a chance that it could be worded better. For a question like this, I'd always expect GMAC to tell you something like sequence n is defined for all positive integers. FWIW, if you're going to notice an omission like you did, I think it's also worth pointing out that there would be no way to know that 0 is the starting point...what if the sequence is defined for all prime numbers? Or for all negative integers from -21 to -11? You're right that they need to define the domain, so why assume that 0 is the first number in that domain, either?
Moderator:
Math Expert
97851 posts