It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 14:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2012, 01:20
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:35) correct 28% (01:57) wrong based on 187 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's classes, she saw that the roster for her economics class (E) had 26 names, the roster for her marketing class (M) had 28, and the roster for her statistics class (S) had 18. When she compared the rosters, she saw that E and M had 9 names in common, E and S had 7, and M and S had 10. She also saw that 4 names were on all 3 rosters. If the rosters for Professor Wang's 3 classes are combined with no student's name listed more than once, how many names will be on the combined roster?

A. 30
B. 34
C. 42
D. 46
E. 50
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Bunuel on 30 Sep 2014, 03:45, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the tags.

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7736

Kudos [?]: 17780 [1], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2014, 21:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
prasannajeet wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
saxenarahul021 wrote:
When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's classes, she saw that the roster for her economics class (E) had 26 names, the roster for her marketing class (M) had 28, and the roster for her statistics class (S) had 18. When she compared the rosters, she saw that E and M had 9 names in common, E and S had 7, and M and S had 10. She also saw that 4 names were on all 3 rosters. If the rosters for Professor Wang's 3 classes are combined with no student's name listed more than once, how many names will be on the combined roster?

A. 30
B. 34
C. 42
D. 46
E. 50

Total # of students 26+28+18-(9+7+10)+4=50.

Answer: E.

For more check ADVANCED OVERLAPPING SETS PROBLEMS

Hi Bunuel
Lemme know why it is +4 rather than -4

Also please solve through ven-diagram actually my i got wrong while solving in ven diagram....

Rgds
Prasannajeet

When making the Venn diagram here, start by putting in the number of students which are in all 3 sets i.e. 4
Next, E and M had 9 names in common so the overlap of E and M excluding the overlap of all 3 will be 9 - 4 = 5.
Similarly for the E and S overlap and M and S overlap.
Next, E has 26 people and after removing 5 + 4 + 3 = 12, we are left with 14 people who have taken only E. Similarly for M and S too.

Attachment:

Ques3.jpg [ 15.92 KiB | Viewed 3859 times ]

Now add all the students in the venn diagram = 14 + 5 + 13 + 3+ 4 + 6 + 5 = 50
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17780 [1], given: 235

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2014
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 29 [1], given: 22

Re: When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2014, 03:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
it's easier and more efficient to use the formula rather than a venn diagram in the actual exam.

For this problem, the appropriate formula should be:
Total = Group 1 + Group 2 + Group 3 - (Sum of two group overlaps) + All three + Neither
Total = 26 + 28 + 18 - (9 + 7 + 10) + 4 + 0 = 50

FYI, if a question asks for "Exactly" two groups, the formula is slightly modified:
Total = Group 1 + Group 2 + Group 3 - (Sum of Exactly 2 group overlaps) - (2 x All Three) + Neither

Kudos [?]: 29 [1], given: 22

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132610 [0], given: 12326

Re: When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Nov 2012, 03:48
saxenarahul021 wrote:
When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's classes, she saw that the roster for her economics class (E) had 26 names, the roster for her marketing class (M) had 28, and the roster for her statistics class (S) had 18. When she compared the rosters, she saw that E and M had 9 names in common, E and S had 7, and M and S had 10. She also saw that 4 names were on all 3 rosters. If the rosters for Professor Wang's 3 classes are combined with no student's name listed more than once, how many names will be on the combined roster?

A. 30
B. 34
C. 42
D. 46
E. 50

Total # of students 26+28+18-(9+7+10)+4=50.

Answer: E.

For more check ADVANCED OVERLAPPING SETS PROBLEMS
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132610 [0], given: 12326

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 56

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2014, 20:11
Bunuel wrote:
saxenarahul021 wrote:
When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's classes, she saw that the roster for her economics class (E) had 26 names, the roster for her marketing class (M) had 28, and the roster for her statistics class (S) had 18. When she compared the rosters, she saw that E and M had 9 names in common, E and S had 7, and M and S had 10. She also saw that 4 names were on all 3 rosters. If the rosters for Professor Wang's 3 classes are combined with no student's name listed more than once, how many names will be on the combined roster?

A. 30
B. 34
C. 42
D. 46
E. 50

Total # of students 26+28+18-(9+7+10)+4=50.

Answer: E.

For more check ADVANCED OVERLAPPING SETS PROBLEMS

Hi Bunuel
Lemme know why it is +4 rather than -4

Also please solve through ven-diagram actually my i got wrong while solving in ven diagram....

Rgds
Prasannajeet

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 56

SVP
Status: The Best Or Nothing
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 1852

Kudos [?]: 2709 [0], given: 193

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2014, 01:13
It takes more time to read the problem, otherwise the Venn diagram is quite straightforward

Total students = 26 + (5+6) + 13 = 50

Answer = E
_________________

Kindly press "+1 Kudos" to appreciate

Kudos [?]: 2709 [0], given: 193

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15704

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Re: When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2016, 02:18
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Re: When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2016, 02:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# When Professor Wang looked at the rosters for this term's

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.