|All Reviews > [Tests] Manhattan Prep GMAT CATs Reviews|
Joined: Aug 13, 2017
REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by gmat club tests [?]
The MGMAT CAT gets on top of your head and keeps you going towards the best.
IMO: Quants is way harder than normal GMAT prep test or original test. Most of the question are in the range of 700-800.
Anyone aspiring for Q50/Q51 needs to try this and a score of Q47/Q48 + will most likely land you on the Q50/51 side on real GMAT.
Verbal questions quality is the best here. Pretty much what you score here will reflect on your real GMAT with +/- 2-3 points.
Overall if you are able to get, say 670-690, you can expect a score of 700-740.
Joined: Mar 28, 2019
680 Q45 V38
This was a very good source for a good start to GMAT prep. I took 5 CATs and I am saving the last one for 2 weeks before my exam. I am scoring much higher on other prep course CAT's than MGMAT but I do find these questions to be a good preparation for the real exam. The quant will prepare you and you should not be discouraged by the somewhat lower scores on this section. Use it as a tool to learn rather than a tool to see how many math questions you got right. Verbal is pretty accurate, maybe a little bit harder too.
Joined: Jul 23, 2018
Quant- Difficulty level of questions is high. Hence, practising them would be lead to a high score. Good segregation after tests topic wise. This helps to identify the weak sections and improve accordingly.
Verbal - The quality of questions is good. Explanations for correct answers are not satisfactory, especially for sentence correction.
Overall - Difficult tests compared to actual GMAT. Good analytics. Need further explanations for answer choices.
Guides are very informative. Exhaustive for Sentence correction. Quant basics are covered and only advanced topics are available in detail.
Most of the 700 - 800 level verbal questions are available in GMAT club and look repeated.
Joined: May 09, 2015
680 Q48 V36
I have taken Manhattan Prep CATs multiple times, and each time it has exceeded my expectations. Though there are always some questions which seem to be out of GMAT's league but overall the tests have been extremely helpful in determining which section should be attempted first and the pattern. Secondly, it gives a unique experience of how GMAT will appear on the actual date.
I recommend the future GMAT test takers to use MPrep's CATs to correctly identify where they are going wrong and what else cant hey do improve on their performance.
Also, the solutions are very good! One must look at the solutions of the questions that you have done wrong.
Thanks and all the best.
Joined: Apr 03, 2018
750 Q50 V41
Manhattan prep gmat cats are definitely one of the best cats available. I recommend them for everyone taking the gmat. They are available at a fairly cheaper price as compared to most other cats.
I have found them to be more difficult than the actual gmat so don't get discouraged after seeing the results. Instead, use them to identify your weak spots and fill-in the knowledge gaps. They have high quality questions 700 level questions which are really good for practice. The people behind the tests seem to have done some good background work. The tests have a very similar feel as the GMAT Prep or GMAT itself. Every test has a vast variety of questions. Rarer topics such as Bold Faced CR or Subjunctive Mood or complex Set Theory questions or interesting Coordinate Geometry questions, which I did not find in my experience with other mock tests/material were present in the MGMAT test in fair proportion. I would say...Go for it!
Joined: Sep 29, 2017
720 Q49 V39
I purchased the Manhattan GMAT CATs earlier this year with the hopes to have a very realistic experience of the GMAT. I took 3-4 of their practice exams (did not finish all 6). Here are my findings:
SC: they emphasize too much on the meaning. While I have found meaning related SC on the official exams, they tend to be less than 1% of the questions. More than 50% of Manhattan GMAT questions have something or the other to do with meaning and why the answer is incorrect because the meaning changed. What's more important that the same logic that I apply to the official questions would many times give me the wrong answer in MGMAT.
CR: their CR is relatively OK. The same logic that I apply to the official questions works on this so not much to say. Overall, they aren't difficult and are probably 600 level questions.
RC: similar to CR, their RC is just okay. I have found that sometimes more than 1 answer choice would make sense. This is something that will never happen on the official questions. While one could argue that I may not know the content (see what I did there? it's called quantifying...), I'm pretty confident in my English as a native speaker.
PS: absolutely horrible. I learned nothing from this other than how easy it is to pull my hair out. Here's the trick: the official questions may seem hard, but can be solved very quickly no matter how difficult. It's a matter of finding the pattern and applying it. Here, it's 5 different steps required to get to the answer. Who has that kind of time? More importantly, how is this even relevant?
DS: same as PS. Too much work, no learning.
Overall: these exams will get you to a 600 maybe. The overall content isn't that relevant and I found these exams to be a waste of time and money. I have no gripes against MGMAT or the fact that I lost $50 - I just wish there was something that was very relatable to the official exam and so far I have found nothing to be close other than the official guides.
Joined: Aug 20, 2016
610 Q49 V25
I have used Manhattan tests for my last GMAT exam. Here goes the feedback -
I found the questions are good but very tough. Both Quant and Verbal questions are hard to solve. The questions need more time than avg of 1.5-2 min to solve in both sections, which was not the case with actual exam. If you practice these CATs you should end up scoring more on the real GMAT test than in the Manhattan tests. So MGMAT can act as a benchmark for improvement or as a morale breaker, depending on how you want to see it. There was +50 score difference between manhattan and original test for me.
Hope this helps.
Joined: Aug 29, 2017
640 Q49 V27
I registered for Manhattan Prep GMAT Test before my first attempt of GMAT (3rd October 2017).
Comparison with other CAT test series -
Before joining Manhattan I was giving Princeton Review test series. According to my experience Princeton review Test series is not as matching to GMAT as Manhattan test.
CAT test detailed Analysis -
After giving the CAT test in Manhattan, You can get detailed analysis of the test. You will also get Your percentage of correct answer category wise (for example they will show You that You did 60% parallelism question correct in the test). This helps to analyse Your level more accurately.
Manhattan also gives detailed explanation of all the questions and I found all the explanations pretty good. They were easy to understand.
Comparison with GMAT -
I think for predicting Your score on actual GMAT, Manhattan test series is the best resource. During my tests before GMAT i was getting score of 620-640, and in GMAT I got 640. And in exam I was feeling that GMAT is almost same as Manhattan CAT tests. I think most of the people will get their GMAT score within variation of 20 from Manhattan tests.
So before giving attempt to GMAT is best to analyse Your level through Manhattan test series.
Joined: Jan 24, 2018
REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by school email address [?]
The CAT exams are great for applying your learnings in a real test-taking scenario. I treat mine like the real tests, taking them all the way through and at the time of day my real GMAT is scheduled. They are especially helpful because they are timed and you can generate assessment reports that help you understand your strengths and weaknesses. The Manhattan navigator allows you to combine assessments from multiple CAT's at once, which helps you really understand where you can make improvements. Time is also broken down by question, so you can see how your timing correlates to the answers you had right or wrong.
Joined: Apr 20, 2018
720 Q48 V40
I took Manhattan's Prep's CAT's after enrolling in a live Manhattan course. I was surprised by the quality of these tests.
Firstly, these tests are not very comparable to the GMATPrep tests. For example, I found the quant to be daunting. The entire quant section was unbelievably wordy and far more complex than anything I had seen on GMATPrep quant. With that being said, Manhattan Prep's quant section could be useful in terms of skill building, but it is far too unrealistic to the GMAT quant. (Fair warning: these tests made me question my quant ability, and really drained my confidence, take with caution).
Lastly, I felt the Verbal portion was slightly easier on average. The SC and CR are on par, but the RC passages are not too difficult to read, I felt the GMATPrep readings were a bit more cumbersome.