Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with Table analysis questions on GMAT Data Insights? You're not alone! With typical accuracy rates hovering around 45% and average solving time of 3.25 minutes per question, Table analysis can be a real challenge.
We present a collection of 30 GMAT Focus practice questions covering Problem Solving, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, and Critical Reasoning. Take this GMAT practice quiz live with peers, analyze your GMAT study progress, and more.
Sayali narrates her experience of succeeding on the GMAT after 4 attempts & 2 years of preparations. Sayali achieved 99 percentile score on GMAT Focus edition after significantly improving her performance in verbal section of the GMAT
After just 3 months of studying with the TTP GMAT Focus course, Conner scored an incredible 755 (Q89/V90/DI83) on the GMAT Focus. In this live interview, he shares how he achieved his outstanding 755 (100%) GMAT Focus score on test day.
In this conversation with Ankit Mehra, IESE MBA and CEO & Co-Founder, of GyanDhan, we will discuss how prospective MBA students can finance their MBA education with education loans and scholarships.
What do András from Hungary, Pablo from Mexico, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Rishab from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
Join us for an exclusive one-day event focused on mastering the GMAT and maximizing your preparation resources! Here's what you can expect: Don't miss out on this invaluable opportunity to supercharge your GMAT preparation journey.
4 Steps to Analyze Your GMAT Practice Tests
[#permalink]
24 Dec 2018, 11:56
1
Bookmarks
Beautiful article written by MANHATTAN PREP. thought it's worth sharing and will help people analyse their mocks properly
4 Steps to Analyze Your GMAT Practice Tests by Stacey Koprince
How many GMAT practice tests have you taken so far? Are you satisfied—or frustrated—with your progress?
One of the biggest mistakes I see students make is also relatively easy to fix: they don’t learn what they should be learning from their practice tests. This is exactly what we’re going to talk about in this series.
Today, we’re going to talk about a global review of your GMAT practice tests: How did you do on executive reasoning and timing?
You Don’t Get Better While Taking a Practice Test Wait, if you don’t get better while taking a practice test, then why are we starting here? Read on.
Have you ever done this? You take a test, but aren’t happy with your score, so a few days later (or even the next day!), you take another exam.
Bad move! First, your data from that first test already tells you what you need to know; your skills aren’t going to change radically in a week. Don’t waste 3 hours of valuable study time (not to mention, one of your limited GMAT practice tests!) in order to get the same data that you already have.
Alternatively, have you read online that someone out there took 14 GMAT practice tests in a 6-week period and swears by this method of studying because he then got a 760? If you do just what he did, you’ll get a 760 too!
Sadly, that’s unlikely to work either. Do you remember that one kid from your school, the one who was always excited when standardized test days came around? She was super annoying because she just did well on these tests “naturally” and she actually liked taking them. (Yes, that was me. Sorry.)
Here’s the thing: for people like me, sure, the brute force approach seems to work. But we are, in fact, extensively analyzing our own data; we just do so more quickly than most. Everyone needs to use this data to figure out how to get better.
You’re going to use your GMAT practice tests to:
(1) practice what you’ve already learned,
(2) provide data to help you build a roughly 2-3 week study plan prioritizing certain things based on what your analysis told you, and
(3) figure out how to get better at executive reasoning.
Go ahead and click that link now. I’ll wait.
Ready? Let’s go!
Use Your GMAT Practice Tests to Learn Your Strengths and Weaknesses Within the first roughly 2 weeks of your study, take a practice test. (Seriously! Don’t put this off!) Also: the gap between practice test 1 and 2 will be on the longer side—say 6 to 8 weeks. After that, you’ll settle into a more regular cycle of about 2 to 3 weeks.
I’ll base my discussion on the metrics that are given in Manhattan Prep GMAT practice tests, but you can extrapolate to other tests that give you similar performance data.
You will likely need at least 60 minutes to do this analysis, not counting any time spent analyzing individual problems. If that sounds like a lot, split this into smaller tasks. Plan to spend 30 minutes each for your initial analysis of Quant and Verbal.
Where Should I Start? I know you’ll want to look at your overall scores first. But don’t do what so many people do—immediately become demoralized because you think your score is too low.
Right now, your score is what it is—but this isn’t the real test. You’re going to use this to get better. That’s the real focus here.
So, let’s put those scores into some context. First, how confident can you be that they reflect your current ability level?
Did you run out of time in any section and either guess randomly to finish or just not finish the section at all? If so, your score will be pushed down, so your actual ability level is likely higher than your score reflects. (But you do need to fix the timing problem.) Conversely, did you use the pause button or otherwise use extra time to solve anything? Did you take much longer breaks than the real test would allow or look something up? If so, your score may be artificially inflated. (This is why we recommend sticking strictly to test conditions when taking a practice exam.) Did you take the exam after a long day at work when you were already pretty mentally fatigued? If so, your performance might have dropped as a result. Next, pull up the problem list for Quant or Verbal. The problem lists show each question, in order as you took the test, as well as various data points about those questions.
“Correct / Incorrect” Column Any strings of 4+ questions wrong?
If so, look at time spent. Were you low on time and rushing? Alternatively, were they really hard? Maybe you’d done well on the prior problems, so got a few really hard ones…and maybe you should have gotten these hard ones wrong. Did you happen to get a string of things that you just didn’t know how to do at the time, but looking at them now, you think you can learn (at least some of) this? The “I did well! And then I didn’t…” scenario
The first one or two in a string were really hard, so you spent extra time. You got them wrong (because…they’re hard). You knew you spent extra time, so you sped up on the next couple and made careless mistakes, getting those wrong as well.
If this happened to you, what do you think you should do to remedy the issue?
The “I didn’t study this yet and/or this is a weakness” scenario
You ran up against a little string of things that you haven’t studied yet—or maybe it was a mix of things you don’t like and things you haven’t studied yet.
What should you do about this?
For the first scenario, you probably need to train yourself to bail quickly on the stuff that’s too hard even when you spend extra time. Then, you won’t be behind on time when you get a question at a level you can handle, and so you’ll be able to get that one right next time.
For the second scenario, which of these things is a good opportunity for you to learn? Add a couple of things to your study plan for the coming week or two—but don’t add everything. There’s only so much you can do in a couple of weeks, so be choosy.
“Cumulative Time” vs. “Target Cumulative Time” Go back up to the top of the Problem List. The Cumulative Time column tells you how much time you spent to that point in the section. The Target Cumulative Time column indicates how much time you’d want to have spent based on the timing averages we need to hit for the exam. Compare the two columns.
How closely did you stick to the expected timeframe? It’s completely normal to be off by +/- 2 minutes, and I’m actually not too concerned as long as you’re within about 3 minutes of the expected timeframe.
Are you 3+ minutes behind (too slow)? If so, where was that extra time spent? How well did you really do on those problems? They should be all or mostly correct, since you chose to allocate extra time to them! For the ones you’re getting wrong even with extra time, start cutting yourself off when faced with a similar problem in future. Are you 3+ minutes ahead (too fast)? If so, where are you picking up that time? How well did you do on those problems? If you know you don’t know how to do a problem, it’s a great idea to guess fast. If you were going quickly because you did know how to do it, though, and then made a careless mistake, you’ll want to remedy the overall timing problem so that you don’t make that kind of mistake next time. Pause and Reflect We’re about halfway through our analysis of the Problem List. What have you figured out so far? What are your hypotheses about what went well and what didn’t go as well? Are there any particular things you want to look out for to help confirm or deny those hypotheses as you continue analyzing?
Analyze Your Timing Even if your cumulative time was fine, you might still exhibit a very common problem on GMAT practice tests: up and down timing. This is when you spend way too much time on some problems and then speed up on others to catch back up. Your overall timing works out, but you still have a serious timing imbalance on individual problems. The tables below show the rough timing categories to watch out for, by problem type, along with some commentary afterward about how to use the tables. (Don’t start your analysis till you’ve read this whole section.)
Attachment:
sk-474-image-1.png
The definition of “Warning Track” is really just getting close to the Too Slow time. I pay attention to how often I come close to Too Slow without actually going over.
It’s fine to have some Warning Track questions—just be careful not to have so many that you’re causing yourself big headaches elsewhere.
Averages for Verbal questions vary by type, so for Verbal, I recommend analyzing one type at a time.
Attachment:
sk-474-image-2.png
Now. How to use all of the above?
Too Fast has a question mark after the Too (?) because there are two great reasons to have a really fast problem:
(1) You knew exactly what you were doing and you got it right—fast.
(2) You knew you didn’t know how to do it and you guessed—fast.
If either of those is the case, great: I did the right thing! However, if I miss something I knew how to do because I made a careless mistake—I have a timing problem. Or if I misread the problem because I was rushing through…ditto.
From now on, when I say Too Fast, I’m referring specifically to the not-good reasons. When you have a good reason to go fast, it’s not too fast.
Too Slow is too slow even if you got the problem right. When you take that much time, you just cause yourself problems elsewhere in the section.
Now, in your problem list, click on the Time column header. This will re-sort the questions from fastest to slowest (you can click it again to sort from slowest to fastest). Examine the problems by time, using the tables as a guide.
How many “too fast” questions did you think you were getting right but you missed? Or you did get right but got lucky? Or you missed but think you could have gotten right if you’d only had time to try it properly? How many “too slow” questions did you miss? Look at the problems—at what point should you have cut yourself off and guessed? Did you have any crazy-slow problems (e.g. a minute beyond the Too Slow time)? Even if you got it right, maybe you should have gotten it wrong much faster and spent that time elsewhere. How Was Your Timing on Your GMAT Practice Tests? If you have more than a couple of questions in the too fast or too slow categories (for the latter, regardless of whether they’re right or wrong), then you’ve got a timing problem on GMAT practice tests. For example, if you had 4 questions over 3m each, then you almost certainly missed other questions elsewhere simply due to speed—that extra time had to come from somewhere. And chances are it came from a too fast problem on which you made a mistake.
Alternatively, if there is even one that is very far over the too slow mark, you have a timing problem. If you have one Quant question on which you spent 4m30s, you might let yourself do this on more questions on the real test—and there goes your score. (By the way, the only potentially acceptable reason is: I was at the end of the section and knew I had extra time, so I used it. And my next question would be: what about saving that mental energy for the next section of the test? ☺)
For each section of the test, get a general sense of whether there is:
not much of a timing problem (e.g., only 1 or 2 questions in the too fast or too slow range—and not way too slow), a small timing problem (e.g., 4-5 questions in the warning track range, or a couple of problems in the too slow category, plus a few too fast questions), or a larger timing problem (e.g., >5 questions in the warning track range, or 3+ questions that are too slow or some that are way too slow, plus multiple too fast questions). Note that I don’t specify above whether the warning track and too slow questions were answered correctly or incorrectly. It isn’t (necessarily) okay to spend too much time just because the question was answered correctly.
Next, what is that timing problem costing you on your GMAT practice tests? How many problems fit into the different categories? Approximately how much time total was spent on the “too slow” problems? How many “too fast” questions did that cost you or could it have cost you? Did it cost you any other problems? Examine all of the problems (even those done with normal time) to locate careless errors. How many of your careless errors occurred when you were rushing or just plain tired out because you’d spent too much mental effort elsewhere?
Finally, are there any patterns in terms of the content area? For example, perhaps 80% of the “too slow” Quant problems were PS Story problems or two of the “too slow” SC problems were Modifier problems. Next time, we’re going to talk about how to use the assessment reports to dive more into this data on your GMAT practice tests, but do try to get a high level sense of any patterns that jump out at you.
All of the above allows you to quantify just how bad any timing problems are. Now, I’m going to make a pronouncement that will wow you: You have a timing problem, don’t you?
Actually, we all have timing problems. The question is just what yours are and how significant they are. If you’re having trouble letting go on hard questions (and, really, aren’t we all?), learn how to make better decisions during the exam.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
Archived GMAT Club Tests question - no more replies possible.