Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 20:51 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 20:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
duttsit
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Last visit: 19 Feb 2016
Posts: 493
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 493
Kudos: 708
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cool_jonny009
Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Last visit: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Location: MS
Posts: 239
Kudos: 2,300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
how do u know that 21! has to be divisible by 3

duttsit
B 2

21! has to be divided by 3

add all digits gives 61 + x
to divide by 3 it has to be 63
x = 2
User avatar
christoph
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Last visit: 23 Nov 2011
Posts: 684
Own Kudos:
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Kudos: 1,587
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i did it the same as duttsit did it. the number is a multiple of the primes 1...21. i tried 11 and got 2 for x.
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,290
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
christoph
i did it the same as duttsit did it. the number is a multiple of the primes 1...21. i tried 11 and got 2 for x.


How can you determine whether this number is divisible by 11 Christoff?

I understand Duttsit`s logic, but why not use 5 to get a numerical sum of 66?
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,536
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73
christoph
i did it the same as duttsit did it. the number is a multiple of the primes 1...21. i tried 11 and got 2 for x.

How can you determine whether this number is divisible by 11 Christoff?

I understand Duttsit`s logic, but why not use 5 to get a numerical sum of 66?


How can you determine whether this number is divisible by 11 Christoff?
--> 21!= 1*2*3*4*....*11*12*......*20*21
that's why 21! is divisible by 11

but why not use 5 to get a numerical sum of 66 ----> you're right! :wink:
It would be better to try 9 instead of 3 . The divisibility indicator of 9 is that the sum of all digits forming the number is divisible by 9. Only 63 satisfies this. Thus, x=2.
User avatar
GMATT73
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Last visit: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 2,877
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2,877
Kudos: 1,290
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laxieqv
GMATT73
christoph
i did it the same as duttsit did it. the number is a multiple of the primes 1...21. i tried 11 and got 2 for x.

How can you determine whether this number is divisible by 11 Christoff?

I understand Duttsit`s logic, but why not use 5 to get a numerical sum of 66?

How can you determine whether this number is divisible by 11 Christoff?
--> 21!= 1*2*3*4*....*11*12*......*20*21
that's why 21! is divisible by 11

but why not use 5 to get a numerical sum of 66 ----> you're right! :wink:
It would be better to try 9 instead of 3 . The divisibility indicator of 9 is that the sum of all digits forming the number is divisible by 9. Only 63 satisfies this. Thus, x=2.


So essentially the divisibility rule for 3 and 9 are the same---->sum of the digits/3 or 9

Got it!! 8-)
User avatar
nero44
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Last visit: 28 May 2006
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
Posts: 134
Kudos: 399
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATT73
laxieqv
GMATT73
[quote="christoph"]i did it the same as duttsit did it. the number is a multiple of the primes 1...21. i tried 11 and got 2 for x.

How can you determine whether this number is divisible by 11 Christoff?

I understand Duttsit`s logic, but why not use 5 to get a numerical sum of 66?

How can you determine whether this number is divisible by 11 Christoff?
--> 21!= 1*2*3*4*....*11*12*......*20*21
that's why 21! is divisible by 11

but why not use 5 to get a numerical sum of 66 ----> you're right! :wink:
It would be better to try 9 instead of 3 . The divisibility indicator of 9 is that the sum of all digits forming the number is divisible by 9. Only 63 satisfies this. Thus, x=2.

So essentially the divisibility rule for 3 and 9 are the same---->sum of the digits/3 or 9

Got it!! 8-)[/quote]

question:

since it's a factorial: 1*2*3*4*5...*20*21

could you (in theory) use any number as divisor to find the missing digit?

of course below a certain number, because you cannot add more than a certain number, if it will change the next digit...

right?



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
109728 posts