Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2010
Posts: 61

70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2010, 15:18
Question Stats:
63% (01:33) correct 37% (01:51) wrong based on 750 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of the times,in seconds, that it took each of 10 school children to run a distance of 400 meter. If the SD of ten running times is 22.4 seconds,rounded to nearest tenth of second,how many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean of the 10 running times? A. one B. two C. three D. four E. five
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47017

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2010, 15:32




Director
Status: Apply  Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 643
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2010, 20:41
"How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean" means how many data points from given 10 are less than mean1SD. Bunuel, I don't get this  It says how many are more than mean1SD (one SD below the mean)? Why do you say less? Please explain. Thanks.
_________________
Consider kudos, they are good for health



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47017

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2010, 20:44



Director
Status: Apply  Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 643
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2010, 20:50
How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean. So then 1SD below the mean is 77.6. It asks how many of the 10 running times are more than 77.6? I just replaced the one SD below the mean by the value. There are more than 2... What am I missing?
_________________
Consider kudos, they are good for health



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 47017

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2010, 21:01



Director
Status: Apply  Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 643
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Sep 2010, 21:25
Ok Bunuel, I see what you are saying.. I did not know if everyone will pick it up at one go.. So what do you think the wording would have been if they really wanted to say what I was thinking i.e., the number of running times that are more than 1SD below mean, meaning more than 77.6?
_________________
Consider kudos, they are good for health



Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 100

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Sep 2010, 22:03
Bunuel wrote: sushma0805 wrote: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130
The list shown consist of the times,in seconds,that it took each of 10 school children to run a distance of 400 meter. If the SD of ten running times is 22.4 seconds, rounded to nearest tenth of second, how many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean of the 10 running times ?
a. one b. two c. three d. four e. five "How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean" means how many data points from given 10 are less than mean1SD. We are given that SD=22.4, so we should find mean > mean=100 > there are only 2 data points below 10022.4=77.6, namely 70 and 75. Answer: B. Similar problems: mathquestionsmeanscore88502.html?hilit=below%20mean%20deviationstatisticsquestion99221.html?hilit=below%20mean%20deviation#p764887Hope it's clear. All my time went into finding the mean, is there some quick method??? 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130



Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2010
Posts: 292

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Sep 2010, 11:35
For the mean calculation,
i did it this way 130* 3 = 390 105*2 = 210 70 +75 +80 +85 +90 = 80*5= 400
total = 1000
Takes about 40 seconds at most.
I understood the question and solved it correctly too but looking at the wording posted by mainhoon confused me after i had solved it!



Manager
Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Posts: 89
Location: Bangalore, India

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2010, 02:48
Quick way to find the mean for the given #s....
If you a=observe carefully, the firt 5 numbers (70,75,80,85,90) are evenly spaced by distance 5..so mean for thease five #s is the middile # 80.
Last five #s are also spaced evenly but in an indirect manner.. 105 105 130 130 130 take 10 points from middle 130 and distribute 5 eac to the first 2 ==> 110 110 120 130 130 ==mean is the middle # 120 as the distancce from 110 to 120 is same as that from 120 to 130
Hence the toal mean is the average of 80 and 120 = 100
Hope it helps
Remember: GMAT never wants you to sum up the #s. It wants you to decode the given #s in the above or some other efficient way. Infact, it gives the set of #s which can easily be decoded.



Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 230

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2010, 10:21
ha what wordings, I got confused....read, reread and than got answer B. yesterday also I got a question which had very confusing wordings..... "which of these is MORE NOT LESS LIKELY to be"  what does that mean? sorry for deviating from the original question....
_________________
If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them



Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 118

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Sep 2010, 20:08
Bunuel wrote: WRONG reading: How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean. So more than MeanSD.
CORRECT reading: How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean. So less than MeanSD. I fell for that as well. Thanks for the clarification.



Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 67

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Oct 2010, 18:07
B I was also looking for a quicker way to find the mean... mularimba's method is ok but it will probably take the same amount of time or more to do the intermediate calc.
_________________
Click that thing  Give kudos if u like this



Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 315

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jul 2011, 23:16
sushma0805 wrote: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130
The list shown consist of the times,in seconds,that it took each of 10 school children to run a distance of 400 meter.If the SD of ten running times is 22.4 seconds,rounded to nearest tenth of second,how many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean of the 10 running times ?
a. one b. two c. three d. four e. five Is this the correct way to find mean... Arrange number ...take first and last number/2 i.e 70 + 130 /2 = 200/2 = 100?



Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1899

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jul 2011, 23:46
siddhans wrote: sushma0805 wrote: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130
The list shown consist of the times,in seconds,that it took each of 10 school children to run a distance of 400 meter.If the SD of ten running times is 22.4 seconds,rounded to nearest tenth of second,how many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean of the 10 running times ?
a. one b. two c. three d. four e. five Is this the correct way to find mean... Arrange number ...take first and last number/2 i.e 70 + 130 /2 = 200/2 = 100? No. That should be done only with evenly spaced data set OR Arithmetic Progression. 2,4,6,8,10Common Difference=2 constant 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130> Common difference is not constant.
_________________
~fluke
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 315

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jul 2011, 00:01
fluke wrote: siddhans wrote: sushma0805 wrote: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130
The list shown consist of the times,in seconds,that it took each of 10 school children to run a distance of 400 meter.If the SD of ten running times is 22.4 seconds,rounded to nearest tenth of second,how many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean of the 10 running times ?
a. one b. two c. three d. four e. five Is this the correct way to find mean... Arrange number ...take first and last number/2 i.e 70 + 130 /2 = 200/2 = 100? No. That should be done only with evenly spaced data set OR Arithmetic Progression. 2,4,6,8,10Common Difference=2 constant 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130> Common difference is not constant. Fluke, Looks like i got a fluke here Just kidding ... So whats the fastest way of finding mean here?



Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1899

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jul 2011, 00:22
siddhans wrote: Fluke, Looks like i got a fluke here Just kidding ... So whats the fastest way of finding mean here? Add them up and divide by 10. Should not take more than 15 secs. 70,75,80,85,90 80*5 =400 130*3=390 105*2=210 ********* 1000 *********
_________________
~fluke
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 529

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jul 2011, 00:39
fluke wrote: siddhans wrote: Fluke, Looks like i got a fluke here Just kidding ... So whats the fastest way of finding mean here? Add them up and divide by 10. Should not take more than 15 secs. 70,75,80,85,90 80*5 =400 130*3=390 105*2=210 ********* 1000 ********* Yes , this shudnt take u more than 25 secs. or u can assume mean = 130 use the principle of mean : sum of the deviations from the mean should always be zero 60555045402525+0+0+0 = 300/10 = 30 so mean is 13030 = 100



Intern
Status: Fighting to kill GMAT
Joined: 23 Sep 2012
Posts: 31
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.8
WE: General Management (Other)

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2012, 02:09
fluke wrote: siddhans wrote: Fluke, Looks like i got a fluke here Just kidding ... So whats the fastest way of finding mean here? Add them up and divide by 10. Should not take more than 15 secs. 70,75,80,85,90 80*5 =400 130*3=390 105*2=210 ********* 1000 ********* Here is how I computed the mean. It was pretty fast, and did not involve too many calculations: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 First term (70 (10030)) and last term (130 (100+30)) : Mean is 100. Second term (75 = 70 + 5= (10030 + 5)) and 9th term (130): Mean is 100. 5 is carried over later. Third term (80 = 70 + 10 = (10030 + 10)) and 8th term (130): Mean is 100. 10 is carried over later. Leave the fourth term (85) for the moment. Take the fifth term (90) and add (5+10) from earlier to make a total of 105. Then add this 105 with the remaining two 105 (6th and 7th terms), along with the fourth term to get: Mean = \(\frac{(105*3+85)}{4}\) = 100. Though the explanation is kind of long, the computation is faster than computing by addition and multiplication of all terms.
_________________
Kudos is the currency of appreciation.
You can have anything you want if you want it badly enough. You can be anything you want to be and do anything you set out to accomplish, if you hold to that desire with the singleness of purpose. ~William Adams
Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close to success they were when they gave up. ~Thomas A. Edison
Wir müssen wissen, Wir werden wissen. (We must know, we will know.) ~Hilbert



Senior Manager
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 481
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34 GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2013, 05:53
Bunuel wrote: mainhoon wrote: How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean.
So then 1SD below the mean is 77.6. It asks how many of the 10 running times are more than 77.6? I just replaced the one SD below the mean by the value. There are more than 2... What am I missing? You have a problem with wording. WRONG reading: How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean. So more than MeanSD. CORRECT reading: How many of the 10 running times are more than one SD below the mean. So less than MeanSD. I am still not getting this.. Why is it less and not more.. Please elaborate ..
_________________
hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.
Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/whosaysyouneeda149706.html#p1201595
My GMAT Journey : http://gmatclub.com/forum/endofmygmatjourney149328.html#p1197992




Re: 70 75 80 85 90 105 105 130 130 130 The list shown consist of
[#permalink]
04 Jan 2013, 05:53



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 26 posts ]



