Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
16 Oct 2025, 22:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hey everyone,
So I just got my GMAT score report this week - 725 (Q90, V86, DI82) - and I'm still processing it honestly. When I saw the score up on the screen, I literally just stared at it for a few seconds. I knew the test had gone okay, but 725 – was a nice surprise.
I see a lot of people here trying to navigate the GMAT space, so hopefully this helps someone.
Okay so here's the thing - before August, I was doing what most of us do when they first hear about GMAT. YouTube university. I'd watch a video on CR, then solve some questions I found online on GMAT Club, then maybe watch a Quant video because why not, then jump back to Verbal. There was literally no method to the madness.
I spent maybe a month or so doing this and honestly got nowhere. Like I knew what Data Sufficiency was, I knew the basics of RC and CR, but I had no idea if I was actually getting better or just spinning my wheels.
Then a friend of mine - who'd just scored 725 himself - basically told me to stop messing around and get help. He'd used e-GMAT and had great things to say about it, so I did my research on GMAT Club but what closed the deal was him already achieved a score with them, so in August I finally signed up. Gave my test in September. Here we are. 😊
The Study Plan
First thing I did on e-GMAT was to take a Sigma-X mock (scored 635) and then created a Personalized Study Plan. This really helped me structure my prep in a systematic way.
For the first time, I wasn't just randomly consuming content. The planner told me exactly what to do, it created an entire flow of activities that I needed to complete and asked me to start with Verbal and then Quant and then DI. It tracked everything from course completion to my performance on quizzes and even gave me the flexibility to make adjustment to the planner when I could not study by just marking no show and the entire planner would get auto adjusted. Also, on days where I could spend a few extra hours I could edit the planner - these edit options made the planner more effective and realistic.
I'm someone who needs structure or I'll just procrastinate forever, so this was perfect. I made sure to stay 1-2 days ahead of the schedule because work would sometimes get crazy and I'd miss a day. Having that buffer saved my ass multiple times.
Verbal – V82 to V86
My diagnostic put me at around 76th percentile in Verbal with CR being at 86%ile. So, the planner suggested me to take cementing quizzes – which are timed quizzes having a set of 10 questions in each quiz divided based on difficulty medium and hard at a sub-sectional level to assess your ability and helps identify weak areas, on taking the quizzes I realized soon that I was nowhere able to replicate the 80 percentile on CR and was struggling even on the medium question quizzes.
Hence, I decided to go through the entire CR course because I wanted to do this test once and be done with it. No retakes.
This added like 2 weeks to my prep, but whatever. I wanted to build actual skills and not leave any stone unturned.
What actually changed:
Before: I'd read the question, then just... read all five answer choices and hope something felt right and went with something that sounded correct. Sometimes it worked, mostly it didn't. Also, I had a bad habit of getting outside information in answer choice analysis which really made things worse.
After learning the pre-thinking approach: I'd read the question, then STOP. Like actually pause and think "okay what am I looking for here? What would weaken this? What's the gap in logic?" THEN I'd look at the answers.
This pre-thinking thing felt time consuming at first, like I was wasting time. But it actually made everything faster because I wasn't wasting time considering obviously wrong answers.
This helped me reach 60%, but my goal was set to get to 70% on hard questions considering I was aiming for 700+ score.
Here's where things got annoying. In the cementing quizzes (these are like sub-sectional specific practice sets), I kept getting 60% on hard CR questions. Every. Single. Time.
I'd take the quiz. 60%. Review my mistakes, take it again a week later. 60%. Take a different hard CR quiz. Also 60%.
I was losing my mind. What was I missing?
This is when I checked out the skill data and identified that Assumptions block had lower accuracy for me and hence I started practicing questions on this block on their NEURON platform, which has official questions with really detailed explanations. And honestly? This is what finally broke through for me.
The explanations didn't just say "A is correct because xyz reasons." They'd explain why I was attracted to B, what trap the test makers set, why C seemed tempting but was wrong. This level of detail - understanding WHY I was picking wrong answers - that's what finally got me past 60%.
I knew I was ready when I finally hit 70% on those hard cementing quizzes. That was my signal that okay, Verbal is good to go. The good part is not just my accuracy improved but my timing also became better to solve CR questions from 3 min to 2-2:15 min for hard questions.
DI – DI 74 to DI82
Okay this is the section that still feels unreal to me. I went from DI74 (42nd percentile) to DI82 (93rd percentile).
When I took my first diagnostic, I didn't even know what the subsections were. Multi-source what? Graphics interpretation? I had like 6-7 questions left when time ran out and I was just clicking random answers in panic mode. It was bad.
How I built DI from scratch:
The course broke down each question type - MSR, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, Two-Part Analysis, Data Sufficiency. I had to learn all of it from zero.
I used e-GMAT's structured approach :
1)Learn the Concepts: Went through the course files for each DI subsection (Data Sufficiency, GITA, MSR, TPA). Each course was further divide in modules and each file had grades - like you'd finish a file and get graded on how well you understood it. This made tracking progress super easy. Could literally see - okay I got an A in GITA files, but B in MSR concepts, need to review that.
2) Cementing through Quizzes: This is where it got real. Started with "relaxed time" quizzes (basically more time to work through questions without pressure), then moved to "standard time" once I was comfortable. My mentor Abha set specific targets: 80% accuracy on medium questions, 70% on hard questions. Once I hit those targets in Data Sufficiency, I moved to GITA (concepts and cementing), then to TPA, and lastly MSR.
3) DI Test Readiness: This is where everything you've been practicing actually comes together. They helped me build the mental stamina to sit for longer duration of testing without losing focus. Plus, experiencing test conditions at a sectional level and acing it made me way more confident for the full length mocks and actual test.
Quant – Q90
Quant has always been my strength. So, my strategy was simple: don't let it drop while I fix Verbal and DI.
I'd take one Quant sectional test per week on e-GMAT. That's it. Just enough to stay sharp. Trust me the sectionals helped create a real solid base for the full-length mocks.
The sectional analysis was super helpful though. It showed me I had this bad habit of holding onto questions too long. I'd see a problem, think "I can definitely solve this," and then spend 4 minutes on it and mess up my timing for the rest of the section.
Learning to let go and bookmark stuff was hard for me. But on test day, this saved me. I finished Quant in 34 minutes, went back to a question I'd bookmarked, solved it a different way, changed my answer from wrong to right. Got a Q90!
Test Day
On the actual test once I was done with Quant, I knew I had things going in my favor.
In DI the MSR came after I'd already done 8-9 questions, so I was in a good rhythm. I decided to attempt it instead of auto-skipping. Got 2 out of 3 correct.
Funny thing - my very first DI question was wrong. It was a Two-Part Analysis with a CR twist (my old nemesis), and I just couldn't figure it out. Spent 3 minutes on it, moved on, came back at the end, still couldn't find a better answer. Oh well. The section that terrified me at start ended with 93%ile.
That's basically it. From confused and lost to 99th percentile in about 2.5 months of actual structured work.
Good luck everyone!
So I just got my GMAT score report this week - 725 (Q90, V86, DI82) - and I'm still processing it honestly. When I saw the score up on the screen, I literally just stared at it for a few seconds. I knew the test had gone okay, but 725 – was a nice surprise.
I see a lot of people here trying to navigate the GMAT space, so hopefully this helps someone.
Okay so here's the thing - before August, I was doing what most of us do when they first hear about GMAT. YouTube university. I'd watch a video on CR, then solve some questions I found online on GMAT Club, then maybe watch a Quant video because why not, then jump back to Verbal. There was literally no method to the madness.
I spent maybe a month or so doing this and honestly got nowhere. Like I knew what Data Sufficiency was, I knew the basics of RC and CR, but I had no idea if I was actually getting better or just spinning my wheels.
Then a friend of mine - who'd just scored 725 himself - basically told me to stop messing around and get help. He'd used e-GMAT and had great things to say about it, so I did my research on GMAT Club but what closed the deal was him already achieved a score with them, so in August I finally signed up. Gave my test in September. Here we are. 😊
The Study Plan
First thing I did on e-GMAT was to take a Sigma-X mock (scored 635) and then created a Personalized Study Plan. This really helped me structure my prep in a systematic way.
For the first time, I wasn't just randomly consuming content. The planner told me exactly what to do, it created an entire flow of activities that I needed to complete and asked me to start with Verbal and then Quant and then DI. It tracked everything from course completion to my performance on quizzes and even gave me the flexibility to make adjustment to the planner when I could not study by just marking no show and the entire planner would get auto adjusted. Also, on days where I could spend a few extra hours I could edit the planner - these edit options made the planner more effective and realistic.
I'm someone who needs structure or I'll just procrastinate forever, so this was perfect. I made sure to stay 1-2 days ahead of the schedule because work would sometimes get crazy and I'd miss a day. Having that buffer saved my ass multiple times.
Verbal – V82 to V86
My diagnostic put me at around 76th percentile in Verbal with CR being at 86%ile. So, the planner suggested me to take cementing quizzes – which are timed quizzes having a set of 10 questions in each quiz divided based on difficulty medium and hard at a sub-sectional level to assess your ability and helps identify weak areas, on taking the quizzes I realized soon that I was nowhere able to replicate the 80 percentile on CR and was struggling even on the medium question quizzes.
Hence, I decided to go through the entire CR course because I wanted to do this test once and be done with it. No retakes.
This added like 2 weeks to my prep, but whatever. I wanted to build actual skills and not leave any stone unturned.
What actually changed:
Before: I'd read the question, then just... read all five answer choices and hope something felt right and went with something that sounded correct. Sometimes it worked, mostly it didn't. Also, I had a bad habit of getting outside information in answer choice analysis which really made things worse.
After learning the pre-thinking approach: I'd read the question, then STOP. Like actually pause and think "okay what am I looking for here? What would weaken this? What's the gap in logic?" THEN I'd look at the answers.
This pre-thinking thing felt time consuming at first, like I was wasting time. But it actually made everything faster because I wasn't wasting time considering obviously wrong answers.
This helped me reach 60%, but my goal was set to get to 70% on hard questions considering I was aiming for 700+ score.
Here's where things got annoying. In the cementing quizzes (these are like sub-sectional specific practice sets), I kept getting 60% on hard CR questions. Every. Single. Time.
I'd take the quiz. 60%. Review my mistakes, take it again a week later. 60%. Take a different hard CR quiz. Also 60%.
I was losing my mind. What was I missing?
This is when I checked out the skill data and identified that Assumptions block had lower accuracy for me and hence I started practicing questions on this block on their NEURON platform, which has official questions with really detailed explanations. And honestly? This is what finally broke through for me.
The explanations didn't just say "A is correct because xyz reasons." They'd explain why I was attracted to B, what trap the test makers set, why C seemed tempting but was wrong. This level of detail - understanding WHY I was picking wrong answers - that's what finally got me past 60%.
I knew I was ready when I finally hit 70% on those hard cementing quizzes. That was my signal that okay, Verbal is good to go. The good part is not just my accuracy improved but my timing also became better to solve CR questions from 3 min to 2-2:15 min for hard questions.
DI – DI 74 to DI82
Okay this is the section that still feels unreal to me. I went from DI74 (42nd percentile) to DI82 (93rd percentile).
When I took my first diagnostic, I didn't even know what the subsections were. Multi-source what? Graphics interpretation? I had like 6-7 questions left when time ran out and I was just clicking random answers in panic mode. It was bad.
How I built DI from scratch:
The course broke down each question type - MSR, Table Analysis, Graphics Interpretation, Two-Part Analysis, Data Sufficiency. I had to learn all of it from zero.
I used e-GMAT's structured approach :
1)Learn the Concepts: Went through the course files for each DI subsection (Data Sufficiency, GITA, MSR, TPA). Each course was further divide in modules and each file had grades - like you'd finish a file and get graded on how well you understood it. This made tracking progress super easy. Could literally see - okay I got an A in GITA files, but B in MSR concepts, need to review that.
2) Cementing through Quizzes: This is where it got real. Started with "relaxed time" quizzes (basically more time to work through questions without pressure), then moved to "standard time" once I was comfortable. My mentor Abha set specific targets: 80% accuracy on medium questions, 70% on hard questions. Once I hit those targets in Data Sufficiency, I moved to GITA (concepts and cementing), then to TPA, and lastly MSR.
3) DI Test Readiness: This is where everything you've been practicing actually comes together. They helped me build the mental stamina to sit for longer duration of testing without losing focus. Plus, experiencing test conditions at a sectional level and acing it made me way more confident for the full length mocks and actual test.
Quant – Q90
Quant has always been my strength. So, my strategy was simple: don't let it drop while I fix Verbal and DI.
I'd take one Quant sectional test per week on e-GMAT. That's it. Just enough to stay sharp. Trust me the sectionals helped create a real solid base for the full-length mocks.
The sectional analysis was super helpful though. It showed me I had this bad habit of holding onto questions too long. I'd see a problem, think "I can definitely solve this," and then spend 4 minutes on it and mess up my timing for the rest of the section.
Learning to let go and bookmark stuff was hard for me. But on test day, this saved me. I finished Quant in 34 minutes, went back to a question I'd bookmarked, solved it a different way, changed my answer from wrong to right. Got a Q90!
Test Day
On the actual test once I was done with Quant, I knew I had things going in my favor.
In DI the MSR came after I'd already done 8-9 questions, so I was in a good rhythm. I decided to attempt it instead of auto-skipping. Got 2 out of 3 correct.
Funny thing - my very first DI question was wrong. It was a Two-Part Analysis with a CR twist (my old nemesis), and I just couldn't figure it out. Spent 3 minutes on it, moved on, came back at the end, still couldn't find a better answer. Oh well. The section that terrified me at start ended with 93%ile.
That's basically it. From confused and lost to 99th percentile in about 2.5 months of actual structured work.
Good luck everyone!
Attachments
GMAT-Club-Forum-mnh1hyaf.png [ 91.6 KiB | Viewed 524 times ]
GMAT-Club-Forum-1lyc65lq.png [ 36.4 KiB | Viewed 509 times ]
GMAT-Club-Forum-ybhtyq6h.png [ 129.54 KiB | Viewed 505 times ]
17 Oct 2025, 03:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
huge congrats on 725, that structure you built is exactly what moves people from spinning wheels to compounding gains. if you ever turn this into a proper guide or compare programs, jenova ai can run live searches across GMAT Club, Reddit, YouTube, and academic sources, then synthesize it into a cited PDF or Notion doc, saves hours and keeps it current. happy to see those CR pre-thinking wins translate to timing improvements, good luck!
17 Oct 2025, 05:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
itaquetempora Congratulations on the 725! That DI jump from 42nd to 93rd percentile while simultaneously fixing CR is particularly impressive.
What fascinates me most is your CR breakthrough story. The way you described pre-thinking - "I'd read the question, then STOP. Like actually pause" - represents a fundamental behavioral shift, not just a technique. And your observation that it felt time-consuming but actually saved time is something I see repeatedly: the pause prevents wasting time on obviously wrong answers. How long before this felt natural rather than forced?
For those who might be struggling with CR, you can understand what this "pre-thinking" strategy is and how to implement it for all question types successfully here under the CR module.
For me, your 60% accuracy plateau is what really stands out. Getting stuck at the same accuracy, then breaking through by identifying assumptions as your specific weakness through skill data - this demonstrates something crucial: diagnostic precision breaks plateaus, not general practice.
For Others Stuck at Plateaus
This illustrates what I've observed across hundreds of students: breakthroughs often come not from doing more questions, but from understanding your specific error patterns. When you know exactly which logical structures trip you up, practice becomes targeted rather than hopeful.
Your Quant strategy is also underrated - one sectional per week to maintain strength. So many try to improve everything simultaneously and improve nothing.
What fascinates me most is your CR breakthrough story. The way you described pre-thinking - "I'd read the question, then STOP. Like actually pause" - represents a fundamental behavioral shift, not just a technique. And your observation that it felt time-consuming but actually saved time is something I see repeatedly: the pause prevents wasting time on obviously wrong answers. How long before this felt natural rather than forced?
For those who might be struggling with CR, you can understand what this "pre-thinking" strategy is and how to implement it for all question types successfully here under the CR module.
For me, your 60% accuracy plateau is what really stands out. Getting stuck at the same accuracy, then breaking through by identifying assumptions as your specific weakness through skill data - this demonstrates something crucial: diagnostic precision breaks plateaus, not general practice.
For Others Stuck at Plateaus
This illustrates what I've observed across hundreds of students: breakthroughs often come not from doing more questions, but from understanding your specific error patterns. When you know exactly which logical structures trip you up, practice becomes targeted rather than hopeful.
Your Quant strategy is also underrated - one sectional per week to maintain strength. So many try to improve everything simultaneously and improve nothing.
