It is currently 24 Jun 2017, 01:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 732
A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2009, 20:52
17
KUDOS
144
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:08) correct 45% (01:19) wrong based on 1939 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39626
Re: PS (gmatprep1) -- city population [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2010, 09:32
164
KUDOS
Expert's post
135
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100

As "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district", then the populations of 11 districts should be in the range: $$x$$ and $$1.1x$$.

So we want to minimize $$x$$. To minimize $$x$$ we should make only one district to have that # of population (minimum possible) and the rest 10 districts to have $$1.1x$$ # of population (maximum possible).

$$x+10*1.1x=132$$ --> $$12x=132$$ --> $$x=11$$.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 33
Re: PS (gmatprep1) -- city population [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2010, 15:11
1
KUDOS
why is it that the remaining 10 popullations have all to be equal? cant you have more then two different populations?

I ask because I am having trouble getting to the equation
p+10*1.1p =132

here you are stating that the 10 remaining popullations have the same popul. I am confused because I dont get why the HAVE to be the same...
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39626
Re: PS (gmatprep1) -- city population [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2010, 15:32
6
KUDOS
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
marijose wrote:
why is it that the remaining 10 popullations have all to be equal? cant you have more then two different populations?

I ask because I am having trouble getting to the equation
p+10*1.1p =132

here you are stating that the 10 remaining popullations have the same popul. I am confused because I dont get why the HAVE to be the same...

The populations of 11 districts should be in the range x and 1.1x, but as we want to minimize x then all other district must have max number of population possible so 1.1x (rule: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others; to minimize one quantity, maximize the others).
_________________
Manager
Status: And the Prep starts again...
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Posts: 137
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2012, 05:51
1
KUDOS
Bunuel,

Can you tell me how you arrived at the range? x and 1.1x.
Quote:
As "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district", then the populations of 11 districts should be in the range: x and 1.1x.

_________________

My First Blog on my GMAT Journey

Arise, Awake and Stop not till the goal is reached

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39626
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2012, 06:03
10
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ENAFEX wrote:
Bunuel,

Can you tell me how you arrived at the range? x and 1.1x.
Quote:
As "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district", then the populations of 11 districts should be in the range: x and 1.1x.

Sure. We are told that "no district has a population that is more than 10% greater than the population of ANY other district."

Now, if the least population is x then the greatest population cannot be more than 1.1x. So, all 11 districts must have population between x and 1.1x (between the least and the greatest).

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 65
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2012, 01:35
2
KUDOS
I got this problem on my recent GMATPrep mock. This was the 8th question and I ended up getting this one wrong. This was my first mistake on the test in the quant section. I ended up getting 49Q with a total of 10 incorrect.

Coming to the problem, at the test time, I started with the below logic --:

let city 1 =x

Now city2 can have a max of 10% greater of city1 i.e., city2 = 1.1x

At this point, I guess I missed the trick and I am still trying to digest the solutions provided above.

For city3 = 10% of city2 i.e. 1.1(city2) = 1.1*1.1x = 1.21x

I lost the problem at this stage and could not proceed further. I guessed the answer choice as 10,900.

Going over the mentioned solutions, I think it makes sense to say that the sum of the other 10 would have been approximately 10*1.1x only since the value is going to increase only on the decimal side.

Thus, the equation would have indeed been x + 10(1.1x) = 132

Sometimes it is the easily worded problems which cause the most difficulty in understanding.
_________________

My attempt to capture my B-School Journey in a Blog : tranquilnomadgmat.blogspot.com

There are no shortcuts to any place worth going.

Intern
Joined: 21 Mar 2009
Posts: 20
A certain city with population of 132,000 is to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Dec 2012, 12:19
4
KUDOS
joyce wrote:
OA: D

Like any other verbose weighted avergae problem idea here is to get some idea about average and then how other data are associated wit hit. 132000 for 11 districts means an average of 12000. Now you have to find a number in 10% of this range so on lower side if N is the number than 1.1N >= 12000 or N>= 12000/1.1 i.e >=10900 so 11000 is closest to it.
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 9
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 12:36
1
KUDOS
If we take the max polulation to be x

then

10x + 0.9x=132000
10.9x=132000
x= 12110.09

0.9 x = 121110* .9
=10899.08

Whats the error. Pls tell
_________________

GMAT 1- 770(Q 51 V44)
cya ISB in 2013 !!

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 82
Location: United States
Re: PS (gmatprep1) -- city population [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2013, 14:11
1
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
marijose wrote:
why is it that the remaining 10 popullations have all to be equal? cant you have more then two different populations?

I ask because I am having trouble getting to the equation
p+10*1.1p =132

here you are stating that the 10 remaining popullations have the same popul. I am confused because I dont get why the HAVE to be the same...

The populations of 11 districts should be in the range x and 1.1x, but as we want to minimize x then all other district must have max number of population possible so 1.1x (rule: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others; to minimize one quantity, maximize the others).

Hi Bunuel,
could u please explain the maximize rule you mentioned with a small e.g..???
also,other populations cant exceed 10 % so why are we taking the max permissible value of the population for 10 of them? pls explain
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39626
Re: PS (gmatprep1) -- city population [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2013, 03:58
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
up4gmat wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
marijose wrote:
why is it that the remaining 10 popullations have all to be equal? cant you have more then two different populations?

I ask because I am having trouble getting to the equation
p+10*1.1p =132

here you are stating that the 10 remaining popullations have the same popul. I am confused because I dont get why the HAVE to be the same...

The populations of 11 districts should be in the range x and 1.1x, but as we want to minimize x then all other district must have max number of population possible so 1.1x (rule: to maximize one quantity, minimize the others; to minimize one quantity, maximize the others).

Hi Bunuel,
could u please explain the maximize rule you mentioned with a small e.g..???
also,other populations cant exceed 10 % so why are we taking the max permissible value of the population for 10 of them? pls explain

Sure.

Consider the following problem:

If x and y are positive integers and x+y=10, what is the maximum possible value of y?

We want to maximize y, thus we need to minimize x. Since x is a positive integer then the least value of x is 1. In this case 1+y=10 --> y=9 --> the maximum possible value of y is 9.

DS min/max questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=42
PS min/max questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=63

Next, the part saying "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district" is about the maximum difference in population of districts. For example, if the least population of a district is 10 then no district can have a population more than 10+0.1*10=11.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2013
Posts: 1
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2013, 06:39
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
[quote="ugimba"]A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100

how do you solve this kind of problems .. any general formula(e)? I just split and try ... so usually it takes long time. Some times endup having wrong answer after somuch time spent..[/q

i approached the answer like this, 132000/11= 12000, hence the max population that each city can have is 12000. Let min. population be x. Therefore, x+10x/100=12000, which gives x as 12000/1.1 and x=10909.9. is this method right plz help
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39626
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Dec 2013, 07:06
ddp123 wrote:
i approached the answer like this, 132000/11= 12000, hence the max population that each city can have is 12000. Let min. population be x. Therefore, x+10x/100=12000, which gives x as 12000/1.1 and x=10909.9. is this method right plz help

Your approach is not correct. Please check here: a-certain-city-with-population-of-132-000-is-to-be-divided-76217.html#p831969

Hope it helps.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 311
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2014, 16:58
1
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
ENAFEX wrote:
Bunuel,

Can you tell me how you arrived at the range? x and 1.1x.
Quote:
As "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district", then the populations of 11 districts should be in the range: x and 1.1x.

Sure. We are told that "no district has a population that is more than 10% greater than the population of ANY other district."

Now, if the least population is x then the greatest population cannot be more than 1.1x. So, all 11 districts must have population between x and 1.1x (between the least and the greatest).

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,

Two questions:

1)One area that stumped me was why did we want to minimize ONLY 1 and maximize 10, versus minimizing 10 and maximizing 1? In algebraic form -- why would it not be (10x + 1.1x = 132?)

2) I interpreted the 10% increase as 90% of something, meaning, I wrote, .9Y + 10Y = 132,000 and didn't get the right answer. Why is that wrong?

Thanks,
R
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39626
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2014, 05:35
russ9 wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

Two questions:

1)One area that stumped me was why did we want to minimize ONLY 1 and maximize 10, versus minimizing 10 and maximizing 1? In algebraic form -- why would it not be (10x + 1.1x = 132?)

2) I interpreted the 10% increase as 90% of something, meaning, I wrote, .9Y + 10Y = 132,000 and didn't get the right answer. Why is that wrong?

Thanks,
R

1. If you minimize 10 and maximize 1, you'd get the maximum possible population that the most populated district could have.

General rule for such kind of problems, when the total is fixed:
to maximize one quantity, minimize the others;
to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

2. a is 10% greater than b (a=1.1b --> a=11/10*b), is not the same as b is 10% less than a (b=0.9a --> a=10/9*b).

Hope this helps.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Posts: 17
A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2014, 03:41
1
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
russ9 wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

Two questions:

1)One area that stumped me was why did we want to minimize ONLY 1 and maximize 10, versus minimizing 10 and maximizing 1? In algebraic form -- why would it not be (10x + 1.1x = 132?)

2) I interpreted the 10% increase as 90% of something, meaning, I wrote, .9Y + 10Y = 132,000 and didn't get the right answer. Why is that wrong?

Thanks,
R

1. If you minimize 10 and maximize 1, you'd get the maximum possible population that the most populated district could have.

General rule for such kind of problems, when the total is fixed:
to maximize one quantity, minimize the others;
to minimize one quantity, maximize the others.

2. a is 10% greater than b (a=1.1b --> a=11/10*b), is not the same as b is 10% less than a (b=0.9a --> a=10/9*b).

Hope this helps.

If the question had been "What is the minimum possible population that the most populated district could have?" Would that just be the average--12000?

Makes sense logically and you really cannot do $$10x + 1.1x = 132$$ as that will yield a fraction of a person. A fetus?!
Manager
Joined: 10 May 2014
Posts: 141
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jun 2015, 17:23
1
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100

As "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district", then the populations of 11 districts should be in the range: $$x$$ and $$1.1x$$.

So we want to minimize $$x$$. To minimize $$x$$ we should make only one district to have that # of population (minimum possible) and the rest 10 districts to have $$1.1x$$ # of population (maximum possible).

$$x+10*1.1x=132$$ --> $$12x=132$$ --> $$x=11$$.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,
Just one question that would help me assess if I understood the mechanics correctly... Let´s say that the question had instead asked “what is the maximum possible population that the most populated district could have?”, would the equation to solve the problem look like this?

10x + 1.1x = 132,000
11.1x = 132,000
X = 132,000 / 11.1

Thank you so much!
_________________

Consider giving me Kudos if I helped, but don´t take them away if I didn´t!

What would you do if you weren´t afraid?

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 39626
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2015, 03:18
minwoswoh wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100

As "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district", then the populations of 11 districts should be in the range: $$x$$ and $$1.1x$$.

So we want to minimize $$x$$. To minimize $$x$$ we should make only one district to have that # of population (minimum possible) and the rest 10 districts to have $$1.1x$$ # of population (maximum possible).

$$x+10*1.1x=132$$ --> $$12x=132$$ --> $$x=11$$.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,
Just one question that would help me assess if I understood the mechanics correctly... Let´s say that the question had instead asked “what is the maximum possible population that the most populated district could have?”, would the equation to solve the problem look like this?

10x + 1.1x = 132,000
11.1x = 132,000
X = 132,000 / 11.1

Thank you so much!

_______
Yes, that's correct.
_________________
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 9257
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2015, 21:37
7
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi All,

Certain Quant questions have built in shortcuts IF the answer choices are numbers and if certain other conditions are met. Here, we can TEST THE ANSWERS....

Logically, when a GMAT question asks you to figure out the LEAST or GREATEST value of something, then there are going to be restrictions on how the values will relate to one another. Here we have 11 cities; to make one as SMALL as possible, I'd think to make all of the others as LARGE as possible.

10,700
10,800
10,900
11,000
11,100

Statistically, it's best to TEST either B or D first. D seems like an easier number to manipulate, so I'll TEST that one first.

IF the least city = 11,000
Then 10% greater would be 12,100
IF the other 10 cities are 12,100 each, then they would sum to 121,000
Add in the least city: 121,000 + 11,000 = 132,000

Since all the math that I've done matches the data that I was given....

[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

# Rich Cohen

Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin

# Special Offer: Save \$75 + GMAT Club Tests

60-point improvement guarantee
www.empowergmat.com/

***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************

Director
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 613
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 01:35
2
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100

As "no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district", then the populations of 11 districts should be in the range: $$x$$ and $$1.1x$$.

So we want to minimize $$x$$. To minimize $$x$$ we should make only one district to have that # of population (minimum possible) and the rest 10 districts to have $$1.1x$$ # of population (maximum possible).

$$x+10*1.1x=132$$ --> $$12x=132$$ --> $$x=11$$.

Hope it's clear.

Do you think that this question has no verbiage issue. How come this is possible that all districts exist that no district has population grater than 10% of any other district?
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Re: A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided   [#permalink] 14 Jul 2015, 01:35

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 39 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
21 A certain city with a population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 v 4 05 Jan 2015, 02:40
20 Boomtown urban planners expect the city’s population to 8 14 Jun 2017, 23:51
3 A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 vot 4 15 Apr 2015, 15:13
25 A certain city with a population of 132,000 is to be divided 8 16 Jan 2012, 00:08
5 A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided i 9 30 Jun 2014, 02:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A certain city with population of 132,000 is to be divided

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.