GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Apr 2019, 21:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 104
A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 15 Oct 2017, 10:33
1
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (01:52) correct 39% (01:52) wrong based on 136 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter. He fed one of the puppies super-premium canned dog food, while he fed the other a generic brand from the grocery store. The dog fed on the generic brand gained weight twice as fast as the dog fed the super-premium brand. Because of the difference in these results, the dog enthusiast concluded that the generic brand actually provided nutrition superior to that of the super-premium brand.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the evidence for the dog enthusiast's conclusion except for which of the following?

A. A dog will sometimes gain more weight when eating inferior-quality food because he must eat more of it to obtain the nutrients he needs.
B. The dogs were of mixed breeds and appeared to be descended from dogs of different sizes.
C. Both dogs ate all the food given to them at each serving.
D. The dog enthusiast did not give the two dogs equal amounts of their respective foods.
E. The dog who received the super-premium dog food suffered from a digestive system disorder that hindered his groeth.

I'd like to see your approach, guys

Originally posted by bsv180985 on 31 Aug 2009, 06:51.
Last edited by abhimahna on 15 Oct 2017, 10:33, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 42
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2009, 07:06
Is it (C)?

it seems very obvious.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 104
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2009, 07:15
seongbae wrote:
Is it (C)?

it seems very obvious.

Yes, the OA is C.

But in D no mention to what puppy enthusiat gave more food.
If he gave more food to first (canned dog food), it would strenghen the conclusion, isn't it???
Intern
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 42
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2009, 07:47
Conclusion: the generic brand actually provided nutrition superior to that of the super-premium brand.

(D) The dog enthusiast did not give the two dogs equal amounts of their respective foods.

In order to properly compare two products, you have to use equal amounts. If the dog enthusiast gave more generic brand than super-premium brand, and that's the reason for one puppy gaining more weight than the other one, you cannot properly conclude that one brand is superior to another.
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 636
Location: Cambridge, MA
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2009, 09:24
Quote:

Yes, the OA is C.

But in D no mention to what puppy enthusiat gave more food.
If he gave more food to first (canned dog food), it would strenghen the conclusion, isn't it???
This is a good point! However, the reason D seems tempting here is because you're mistaking "weaken" for "disprove."

The facts in D makes the author's comparison an invalid one--he did not give the two dogs equivalent amounts of food, so cannot logically draw a conclusion based on his findings. You are absolutely correct that it is still possible that he gave less generic food out, and the generic dog still got bigger. However, that possibility has become significantly more remote with the addition of the information found in D. And making the conclusion significantly more remote, even if it's still conceivable, is enough for the GMAT.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 104
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2009, 04:38
KapTeacherEli wrote:
Quote:

Yes, the OA is C.

But in D no mention to what puppy enthusiat gave more food.
If he gave more food to first (canned dog food), it would strenghen the conclusion, isn't it???
This is a good point! However, the reason D seems tempting here is because you're mistaking "weaken" for "disprove."

The facts in D makes the author's comparison an invalid one--he did not give the two dogs equivalent amounts of food, so cannot logically draw a conclusion based on his findings. You are absolutely correct that it is still possible that he gave less generic food out, and the generic dog still got bigger. However, that possibility has become significantly more remote with the addition of the information found in D. And making the conclusion significantly more remote, even if it's still conceivable, is enough for the GMAT.

Thanks!
Intern
Joined: 31 Mar 2012
Posts: 9
Location: France
Schools: HEC '15
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2012, 15:04
Phew, I thought strenghtening first, would have been a tough one..
_________________
Our constraints are what define us. Work hard and never give up.
Manager
Status: I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 185
Schools: Johnson '15
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2012, 07:20
bsv180985 wrote:
A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter. He fed one of the puppies super-premium canned dog food, while he fed the other a generic brand from the grocery store. The dog fed on the generic brand gained weight twice as fast as the dog fed the super-premium brand. Because of the difference in these results, the dog enthusiast concluded that the generic brand actually provided nutrition superior to that of the super-premium brand.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the evidence for the dog enthusiast's conclusion except for which of the following?

A. A dog will sometimes gain more weight when eating inferior-quality food because he must eat more of it to obtain the nutrients he needs.
B. The dogs were of mixed breeds and appeared to be descended from dogs of different sizes.
C. Both dogs ate all the food given to them at each serving.
D. The dog enthusiast did not give the two dogs equal amounts of their respective foods.
E. The dog who received the super-premium dog food suffered from a digestive system disorder that hindered his groeth.

I'd like to see your approach, guys

A: Weakens...weight is increased not because it got more nutrients, because it has to eat more...
B: generally weakens..casts doubt on conclusion..
C: Fine...so what ...does not do anything to conclusion...t
D: Weakens...because it casts doubt on conclusion
E: Out of scope..

so i feel the answer should be either A or D... may be an expert can help us in understanding this question and let us know how to answer this...
_________________
Regards,
Harsha

Note: Give me kudos if my approach is right , else help me understand where i am missing.. I want to bell the GMAT Cat

Satyameva Jayate - Truth alone triumphs
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 219
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2012, 09:47
harshavmrg wrote:
bsv180985 wrote:
A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter. He fed one of the puppies super-premium canned dog food, while he fed the other a generic brand from the grocery store. The dog fed on the generic brand gained weight twice as fast as the dog fed the super-premium brand. Because of the difference in these results, the dog enthusiast concluded that the generic brand actually provided nutrition superior to that of the super-premium brand.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the evidence for the dog enthusiast's conclusion except for which of the following?

A. A dog will sometimes gain more weight when eating inferior-quality food because he must eat more of it to obtain the nutrients he needs.
B. The dogs were of mixed breeds and appeared to be descended from dogs of different sizes.
C. Both dogs ate all the food given to them at each serving.
D. The dog enthusiast did not give the two dogs equal amounts of their respective foods.
E. The dog who received the super-premium dog food suffered from a digestive system disorder that hindered his groeth.

I'd like to see your approach, guys

A: Weakens...weight is increased not because it got more nutrients, because it has to eat more...
B: generally weakens..casts doubt on conclusion..
C: Fine...so what ...does not do anything to conclusion...t
D: Weakens...because it casts doubt on conclusion
E: Out of scope..

so i feel the answer should be either A or D... may be an expert can help us in understanding this question and let us know how to answer this...

I guess you missed something on the question stem part:

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the evidence for the dog enthusiast's conclusion except for which of the following?

It asks which of the following doesnt weakens or is neutral to the argument.
I guess you now have the answer...

Hope this helps..!!
_________________
Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 6
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2012, 10:42
C for me too.rst weakens somehow the argument.
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2015
Posts: 2
Re: A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2015, 22:49
C in 0:53. Pre-thinking certainly helps here.
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2018
Posts: 136
Location: Viet Nam
A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2019, 03:30
bsv180985 wrote:
A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter. He fed one of the puppies super-premium canned dog food, while he fed the other a generic brand from the grocery store. The dog fed on the generic brand gained weight twice as fast as the dog fed the super-premium brand. Because of the difference in these results, the dog enthusiast concluded that the generic brand actually provided nutrition superior to that of the super-premium brand.

Each of the following, if true, would weaken the evidence for the dog enthusiast's conclusion except for which of the following?

A. A dog will sometimes gain more weight when eating inferior-quality food because he must eat more of it to obtain the nutrients he needs.
B. The dogs were of mixed breeds and appeared to be descended from dogs of different sizes.
C. Both dogs ate all the food given to them at each serving.
D. The dog enthusiast did not give the two dogs equal amounts of their respective foods.
E. The dog who received the super-premium dog food suffered from a digestive system disorder that hindered his groeth.

I'd like to see your approach, guys

Conclusion: the generic brand actually provided nutrition superior to that of the super-premium brand.

A. A dog will sometimes gain more weight when eating inferior-quality food because he must eat more of it to obtain the nutrients he needs.
=> so because the dog eats generic food had to eat a higher amount of food, its weight increased higher. It is not because generic food provided higher nutrition => Provide another reason which attacked the conclusion
B. The dogs were of mixed breeds and appeared to be descended from dogs of different sizes.
=> Provide another reason which attacked the conclusion
C. Both dogs ate all the food given to them at each serving.=> Correct choice
D. The dog enthusiast did not give the two dogs equal amounts of their respective foods.
=> For example, if the dog fed on generic brand food was given a higher amount of food than that of the đo fed on super-premium brand, its weight can be higher
E. The dog who received the super-premium dog food suffered from a digestive system disorder that hindered his growth.
=> It is because of the digestive system which caused the lower weight of dog fed on super-premium brand, so it cant be said that the generic brand provided higher nutrition - Provide another reason which attacked the conclusion
_________________
"It Always Seems Impossible Until It Is Done"
A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.   [#permalink] 27 Mar 2019, 03:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A dog enthusiast took home two puppies from the dog shelter.

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.