Last visit was: 01 May 2026, 04:30 It is currently 01 May 2026, 04:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 109,990
Own Kudos:
812,235
 [6]
Given Kudos: 105,967
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,990
Kudos: 812,235
 [6]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VibhuAnurag
Joined: 29 Aug 2016
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 128
Own Kudos:
246
 [4]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 128
Kudos: 246
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 109,990
Own Kudos:
812,235
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,967
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,990
Kudos: 812,235
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 683
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,532
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 683
Kudos: 177
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi MartyMurray KarishmaB

A. Cross-country running is more strategic than many realize, requiring runners to expend mental energy thinking about race tactics.

If revised (A) was: Cross-country running is more strategic than many realize, requiring runners to expend most of their mental energy thinking about race tactics.

Can we say that revised (A) would have been a good weakener? This is just for a clarification.
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 30 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,051
Own Kudos:
11,472
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,051
Kudos: 11,472
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A high school has found that, for each of the last 15 years, the average grade point average for members of the cross-country running teams has exceeded the average grade point average for the school as a whole. This phenomenon can most likely be attributed to the fact that long distance runners have so much time to think while running that they can essentially study as they run.

Which of the following most undermines the conclusion drawn above?


The conclusion is that cross country runners have higher GPAs because running gives them time to study mentally while they run. To undermine this, we want a different reason the cross country team’s GPA is higher, such as the team attracting students who already have high GPAs. That would break the claimed cause and effect. Selection bias is the key idea.

A. Cross-country running is more strategic than many realize, requiring runners to expend mental energy thinking about race tactics.

This makes the “they can study while running” story less believable, because their mental attention may be used for tactics instead. But it still does not explain why their GPA is higher, so it is a weaker underminer than an option that gives an alternative cause.

B. Many cross-country runners are also members of the track-and-field team, for which the average grade point average is actually lower than that of the school as a whole.

This does not weaken the conclusion. If anything, it would make the cross country team’s high GPA seem even more surprising, since some members belong to a lower-GPA group.

C. The cross-country team is among the few teams that do not require a try-out, making it a popular activity for high-achieving students who want to list a sport on their college applications.

This directly undermines the conclusion by giving an alternative explanation: high-GPA students are more likely to join cross country for college application reasons. Then the team’s higher GPA is not because running lets them study, but because the team is made up of students who already perform well academically.

D. Because the nearest cross-country trails are a long distance from the school, cross-country is one of the most time-consuming activities the school offers.

This tends to go the other way. If it takes more time, that would usually reduce study time, which would make the conclusion less plausible, but it still does not explain the higher GPA as well as the selection-bias explanation in C.

E. The cross country team's average grade point average has dropped each of the last three years.

This is irrelevant to the causal claim. The team can still have a higher GPA than the school overall even if its GPA has been decreasing recently, so this does not undermine the proposed explanation.

Answer: (C)
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 30 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,051
Own Kudos:
11,472
 [2]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,051
Kudos: 11,472
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agrasan
Hi MartyMurray KarishmaB

A. Cross-country running is more strategic than many realize, requiring runners to expend mental energy thinking about race tactics.

If revised (A) was: Cross-country running is more strategic than many realize, requiring runners to expend most of their mental energy thinking about race tactics.

Can we say that revised (A) would have been a good weakener? This is just for a clarification.
Agree, revised (A) would be a much better weakener.

The original conclusion depends on this mechanism: runners can “study while running.” If (A) says they use most of their mental energy on race tactics, that directly blocks that mechanism, so it undermines the explanation for the higher GPA.

Still, it is a mechanism-attacker, not a selection-bias alternative like (C). So it would weaken the conclusion, just usually not as strongly as an option that explains the higher GPA for a different reason.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
513 posts
363 posts