GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Jan 2019, 12:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### The winning strategy for a high GRE score

January 17, 2019

January 17, 2019

08:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1658
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2008, 21:25
12
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

91% (01:11) correct 9% (01:18) wrong based on 1334 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 61
Page: 140
Difficulty:

A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 274
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2008, 13:00
I would answer C.

As the number facing is decreasing, it means the distance remaining is decreasing and vice versa the other num is increasing that she has covered one more unit of distance.
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------
When you come to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.

Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 593
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2008, 13:36
I second C. That seems to be the standard way of marking mileposts on highways.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 274
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2008, 21:25
How about the following CR question ??

11-t58442

SKS
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------
When you come to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.

Director
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 673
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2008, 21:57
sondenso wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.[wrong eliminate]
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. [ wrong eliminate]
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning. [ logical]
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered. [ don't feel in the logical gap -eliminate]
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.[ irrelevant -eliminate]

so C
SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1658
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2008, 00:28
Thank all of you guys, paradox is a nightmare for me, do you have any tips for this?
_________________
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 5
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2009, 21:21
A milepost on the towpath read＂21＂on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and＂23＂on its back．She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read＂20＂facing her and＂24＂behind．

Which of the following，if true，would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed．
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers，not miles．
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path．not miles from the beginning．
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered．
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers，not for hikers．
_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 422
Re: Good Question  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2009, 21:40
3
pual wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read＂21＂on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and＂23＂on its back．She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read＂20＂facing her and＂24＂behind．

Which of the following，if true，would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed．
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers，not miles．
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path．not miles from the beginning．
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered．
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers，not for hikers．

I'm not sure I understand this problem, specially the hiker's reasoning part. So I will go by POE.

A: Maybe. Let's keep it for now.
B: Irrelevant, unit won't make a difference in this case.
C: This sounds reasonable, because from the problem description it vaguely seems that the hiker was expecting the numbers to be in a certain order, but in fact it's reversed. Strong candidate, let's keep this for now.
D: Maybe, maybe not. But it doesn't change the dist, or direction.
E: Irrelevant.

Between, A & C, C looks the best. So C for me.
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 5
Re: Good Question  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2009, 01:10
good explanation buddy...thanks...!!!
_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 41
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2010, 10:28
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?
(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 157
Re: Critical Reasoning  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2010, 00:29
I pick C.

It is exactly as C said, nothing more to add.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 438
Re: Good Question  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2011, 09:20
C clearly explains the so called paradox
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2012, 14:06
1
I have chosen the answer C for this question:

You can almost think of this question like a basic math problem. You know that the total distance of the hike is 44 miles. If this individual hikes and sees 21 on the front of the milepost and 23 on the back, you probably won't be sure what those numbers mean. However, after you hike some more and see 20 on the front and 24 on the back, it should tell you that you have just walked 1 mile and that the number on the front tells you remaining distance, not distance traveled.

A. This answer choice would be incorrect because the next sign should only be a 1 mile difference, yet we would have 21 and 24 as the milepost readings.

B. The unit of measurement is not important

C. This is the correct answer and it definitely resolves the paradox.

D. This doesn't make much sense because what milepost would be in between 21 and 20?

E. Who the milepost was put in for is irrelevant.
Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 758
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 May 2013, 00:51
Can someone please provide detailed explanation! Thanks!
VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1060
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 May 2013, 01:12
2
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone please provide detailed explanation! Thanks!

A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?

The correct answer will resolve the "paradox", we can discard

(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. - this would make no difference
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers. - this would make no difference

We are left with

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.

The milepost has a side with "21"(other side "23").She is running and thinks a "22" will follow

However a 20 is on the next milepost, with a 24 on its back.

In her logic the numbers increase 21+1=22 so this count is the number of miles she has run. (=miles from the beginning)
In her path she encounters a decrease 21-1=20 so the actual number does not represent the miles she has run, but the miles LEFT to run.(=miles to the end of the path)

Example: 10 miles
10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 Miles to the end=> decrease
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 Miles from the beg.=> increase
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 636
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2017, 00:42
This is a "Resolve Paradox" type question.

Reading the stimulus one thing is clear, the total distance is 21 + 23 = 44 miles. The solution can almost be pre-phrased:
1. The stones facing her are going to increase in number - in this case they represent miles covered
2. The stones facing her are going to decrease in number - in this case they represent miles to go
3. There is an issue with the numbers on the milepost. the chances of this are almost nil since the addition of the values given in the stimulus is 20 + 24 = 44.

Hence let's look at the choices:
A - Even if they were reversed they should still show 22/22 and not 20/24 or 24/20. Hence out.
B - Does not matter what the quantity the logic will remain same for Kilometers, miles, yards .......Hence out
C - Spot on this is point 2 above. Keep.
D - Tough to justify, these are mileposts if one were missing then this one should have read 19 (facing)/25 or 23/21 (the sum has to be 44), depending if the posts represent distance to go or distance from start, respectively.
E - Bikers, hunters .....hikers I believe all use the same mile. A sailor should be able to figure out the logic even though he would be thinking in terms of nautical miles. Discard.

Hence pick C
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Mannheim Thread Master
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 187
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2017, 04:56
Solution: Hiker sees a milepost marked 21 on one side and 23 on the other. She expects the next milepost to read 22 on both sides. However, the actual sign says 20 and 24.

C is correct - This statement resolves the discrepancy between the true meaning of the mileposts and the hiker's expectation about them by showing how the hiker misinterpreted the mileposts.
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Intern
Status: Don't watch the clock,Do what it does, Keep Going.
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Posts: 37
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2017, 19:29
C would be the answer . Easiest way of getting till there would be elimination process . You will find out the other options are easily eliminated.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3583
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2018, 06:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the &nbs [#permalink] 25 Dec 2018, 06:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.