GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Aug 2018, 10:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1774
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2008, 22:25
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

90% (01:12) correct 10% (01:20) wrong based on 1336 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 61
Page: 140
Difficulty:


A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?


(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.

_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 278
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2008, 14:00
I would answer C.

As the number facing is decreasing, it means the distance remaining is decreasing and vice versa the other num is increasing that she has covered one more unit of distance.
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------
When you come to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 601
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2008, 14:36
I second C. That seems to be the standard way of marking mileposts on highways.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2008
Posts: 18
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2008, 15:12
sondenso wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?
(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed. If numbers have been reversed, it's not only on 'next milepost' but on both of them -> Eliminate it
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. ... don't need to explain why I eliminate it!
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning. logical answer; the distance to the end the path is decreasing each mile -> Hold it
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered. "the milepost one mile further"... so every milestone is at the right place, no one is missing. -> eliminate it
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers. this one is fun but... eliminate it!



-> C :)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 278
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2008, 22:25
How about the following CR question ??

11-t58442

SKS
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------
When you come to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 692
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2008, 22:57
sondenso wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?


(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.[wrong eliminate]
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. [ wrong eliminate]
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning. [ logical]
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered. [ don't feel in the logical gap -eliminate]
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.[ irrelevant -eliminate]

so C
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1774
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: CR-confused  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2008, 01:28
Thank all of you guys, paradox is a nightmare for me, do you have any tips for this?
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 7
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2009, 22:21
A milepost on the towpath read"21"on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and"23"on its back.She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read"20"facing her and"24"behind.

Which of the following,if true,would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers,not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path.not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers,not for hikers.
_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 437
Re: Good Question  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2009, 22:40
2
pual wrote:
A milepost on the towpath read"21"on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and"23"on its back.She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read"20"facing her and"24"behind.

Which of the following,if true,would explain the discrepancy described above?

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers,not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path.not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers,not for hikers.


I'm not sure I understand this problem, specially the hiker's reasoning part. So I will go by POE.

A: Maybe. Let's keep it for now.
B: Irrelevant, unit won't make a difference in this case.
C: This sounds reasonable, because from the problem description it vaguely seems that the hiker was expecting the numbers to be in a certain order, but in fact it's reversed. Strong candidate, let's keep this for now.
D: Maybe, maybe not. But it doesn't change the dist, or direction.
E: Irrelevant.

Between, A & C, C looks the best. So C for me.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 7
Re: Good Question  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2009, 02:10
good explanation buddy...thanks...!!!
_________________

- Its all about correctness first and then the timing.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 53
A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2010, 11:28
A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?
(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 186
Re: Critical Reasoning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2010, 01:29
I pick C.

It is exactly as C said, nothing more to add.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 533
Re: Good Question  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2011, 10:20
C clearly explains the so called paradox
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 166
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Mar 2012, 15:06
1
I have chosen the answer C for this question:

You can almost think of this question like a basic math problem. You know that the total distance of the hike is 44 miles. If this individual hikes and sees 21 on the front of the milepost and 23 on the back, you probably won't be sure what those numbers mean. However, after you hike some more and see 20 on the front and 24 on the back, it should tell you that you have just walked 1 mile and that the number on the front tells you remaining distance, not distance traveled.

A. This answer choice would be incorrect because the next sign should only be a 1 mile difference, yet we would have 21 and 24 as the milepost readings.

B. The unit of measurement is not important

C. This is the correct answer and it definitely resolves the paradox.

D. This doesn't make much sense because what milepost would be in between 21 and 20?

E. Who the milepost was put in for is irrelevant.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 813
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 May 2013, 01:51
Can someone please provide detailed explanation! Thanks!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1096
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 May 2013, 02:12
2
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone please provide detailed explanation! Thanks!


A milepost on the towpath read “21” on the side facing the hiker as she approached it and “23” on its back. She reasoned that the next milepost forward on the path would indicate that she was halfway between one end of the path and the other. However, the milepost one mile further on read “20” facing her and “24” behind.

Which of the following, if true, would explain the discrepancy described above?

The correct answer will resolve the "paradox", we can discard

(B) The numbers on the mileposts indicate kilometers, not miles. - this would make no difference
(E) The mileposts had originally been put in place for the use of mountain bikers, not for hikers. - this would make no difference

We are left with

(A) The numbers on the next milepost had been reversed.
(C) The facing numbers indicate miles to the end of the path, not miles from the beginning.
(D) A milepost was missing between the two the hiker encountered.

The milepost has a side with "21"(other side "23").She is running and thinks a "22" will follow

However a 20 is on the next milepost, with a 24 on its back.

In her logic the numbers increase 21+1=22 so this count is the number of miles she has run. (=miles from the beginning)
In her path she encounters a decrease 21-1=20 so the actual number does not represent the miles she has run, but the miles LEFT to run.(=miles to the end of the path)

Example: 10 miles
10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 Miles to the end=> decrease
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 Miles from the beg.=> increase
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 656
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2017, 01:42
This is a "Resolve Paradox" type question.

Reading the stimulus one thing is clear, the total distance is 21 + 23 = 44 miles. The solution can almost be pre-phrased:
1. The stones facing her are going to increase in number - in this case they represent miles covered
2. The stones facing her are going to decrease in number - in this case they represent miles to go
3. There is an issue with the numbers on the milepost. the chances of this are almost nil since the addition of the values given in the stimulus is 20 + 24 = 44.

Hence let's look at the choices:
A - Even if they were reversed they should still show 22/22 and not 20/24 or 24/20. Hence out.
B - Does not matter what the quantity the logic will remain same for Kilometers, miles, yards .......Hence out
C - Spot on this is point 2 above. Keep.
D - Tough to justify, these are mileposts if one were missing then this one should have read 19 (facing)/25 or 23/21 (the sum has to be 44), depending if the posts represent distance to go or distance from start, respectively.
E - Bikers, hunters .....hikers I believe all use the same mile. A sailor should be able to figure out the logic even though he would be thinking in terms of nautical miles. Discard.

Hence pick C
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Mannheim Thread Master
User avatar
S
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 252
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2017, 05:56
Solution: Hiker sees a milepost marked 21 on one side and 23 on the other. She expects the next milepost to read 22 on both sides. However, the actual sign says 20 and 24.

C is correct - This statement resolves the discrepancy between the true meaning of the mileposts and the hiker's expectation about them by showing how the hiker misinterpreted the mileposts.
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Status: Don't watch the clock,Do what it does, Keep Going.
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Posts: 44
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2017, 20:29
C would be the answer . Easiest way of getting till there would be elimination process . You will find out the other options are easily eliminated.
Re: A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the &nbs [#permalink] 11 Sep 2017, 20:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A milepost on the towpath read 21 on the side facing the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.