Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
19 Nov 2025, 23:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
75% (01:56) correct
25%
(02:04)
wrong
based on 160
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A multinational alliance that has imposed sanctions against Muscovia’s state-owned mining corporation, to pressure the country to demilitarize its installations in the Odansae archipelagoes, is contemplating additional measures for pressuring Muscovia into accepting its proposed demilitarization agreement. The nations of the alliance are considering as their principal new tactic a complete boycott of Muscovia’s struggling timber industry.
The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the nations’ consideration of whether attempting a boycott of the Muscovian timber industry will lead to acceptance of their demilitarization agreement?
A. Would the Muscovian timber industry losing revenue seriously impact Muscovia’s economy?
B. Does a significant proportion of Muscovia’s revenue come from international deals?
C. Do other countries with state-owned mining corporations also have timber industries operating internationally?
D. Have other nations managed to achieve their goals through such tactics?
E. Have other nations successfully secured demilitarization agreements similar to the ones proposed by the alliance?
The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the nations’ consideration of whether attempting a boycott of the Muscovian timber industry will lead to acceptance of their demilitarization agreement?
A. Would the Muscovian timber industry losing revenue seriously impact Muscovia’s economy?
B. Does a significant proportion of Muscovia’s revenue come from international deals?
C. Do other countries with state-owned mining corporations also have timber industries operating internationally?
D. Have other nations managed to achieve their goals through such tactics?
E. Have other nations successfully secured demilitarization agreements similar to the ones proposed by the alliance?
23 Nov 2025, 12:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
25 Nov 2025, 08:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
ankitksingh
DECONSTRUCTING THE ARGUMENT
Goal: To pressure Muscovia into accepting a demilitarization agreement regarding the Odansae archipelagoes.
Current Situation: A multinational alliance has already sanctioned Muscovia’s state-owned mining corporation.
Proposed Plan (The Tactic): Implement a complete boycott of Muscovia’s struggling timber industry.
The Logical Connection: The alliance assumes that the economic pressure resulting from the timber boycott will be sufficient to force Muscovia to agree to demilitarization.
The Question: We need to find the question that is LEAST directly relevant to evaluating whether the plan will work. This is a "Useful to Evaluate" question in reverse. Four options will help us determine if the boycott is likely to succeed; the correct answer will be Irrelevant or Out of Scope.
***
ANALYSIS OF THE OPTIONS
(A) Incorrect. This question is highly relevant. It assesses the magnitude of the impact. If the timber industry is small and its loss wouldn't "seriously impact" the economy, the pressure applied would be weak, making the plan unlikely to succeed. If the impact is severe, the plan is more likely to work.
(B) Incorrect. This question assesses the vulnerability of the target. Since the boycott is being conducted by a "multinational alliance," its success depends on whether Muscovia actually relies on international trade. If Muscovia’s revenue is purely domestic, an international boycott is useless. Therefore, the answer to this question helps evaluate the plan's potential effectiveness.
(C) Correct. This question asks about the industrial makeup of other countries. Whether other nations with mining corporations also have timber industries is an Irrelevant Comparison. The economic structure of valid comparison countries has no bearing on the causal link between "boycotting Muscovia's timber" and "Muscovia accepting the agreement." Knowing the answer to this provides no insight into Muscovia's specific political or economic reaction to the sanctions.
(D) Incorrect. This question looks for precedent regarding the tactic. If other nations have successfully used boycotts to achieve political goals, it strengthens the likelihood that this specific boycott could work. If such tactics historically have a 0% success rate, it casts doubt on the plan. While not as specific as A or B, precedent is considered relevant evidence in decision-making contexts.
(E) Incorrect. This question looks for precedent regarding the goal. It asks if the specific type of agreement (demilitarization) is something that nations actually agree to under pressure. If no nation has ever agreed to such a proposal, the goal might be unrealistic regardless of the tactic used. Thus, it is relevant to the "consideration" of the plan's viability.
Answer: (C)
