GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Aug 2018, 23:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 May 2015
Posts: 100
GMAT 1: 630 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V44
A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2015, 18:50
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (01:27) correct 38% (01:40) wrong based on 344 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway stations. The poster proclaims: "Let the new biological pesticide containing micro-organisms be your new best friend! Because it's used by 4 out of every 5 florists, you can be sure that this product will answer your pesticide needs."

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the advertisement's argument?


A) Though an efficient pesticide on the East Coast, the new biological pesticide has yet to undergo satisfactory experimentation in other areas.

B) The company promoting the new biological pesticide sent free samples of it to all florists in the urban centers of the East Coast.

C) Two years ago, most florists were using a chemical pesticide that was popular at the time while two years prior to that, another brand of chemical pesticide was considered the norm.

D) The Nursery Newsweek, published at the time of the advertisement, called on florists to move from chemical pesticides to biological ones, elaborating on the latter's advantages.

E) Pesticides are needed more in nurseries than in florist shops, where plants and flowers are usually held for short periods of time.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 385
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2015, 15:03
Still don't get why B is the correct answer. It talks about large sample size and this should strengthen the argument. I opted for E. Can anyone explain?
_________________

"Are you gangsters?" - "No we are Russians!"

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 May 2015
Posts: 100
GMAT 1: 630 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V44
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2015, 16:56
2
Konstantin1983 wrote:
Still don't get why B is the correct answer. It talks about large sample size and this should strengthen the argument. I opted for E. Can anyone explain?


B is the correct answer because the fact that "it's used by 4 out of every 5 florists" is because it was given to them for free, and not because it is the best pesticide, making the argument that "this product will answer your pesticide needs." questionable.

I don't really see why E would weaken the argument.
Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Apr 2015
Posts: 416
Reviews Badge
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2015, 23:36
Hi mascarfi,

I double the above claim. As per your statement, the samples were sent for free then all should be using it. But as per the claim made in the AD it is only a case of 4/5.

Normally the guy should either be a complete fake or a completely genuine one. :) The guy who put the ad is somewhere in between the two cases. :P

I will give my 2 cents for why I chose E.

As per the claim 4/5 florists use the pesticide. But as per E, nurseries require the pesticides and not florists hence any claim of 4/5 or even 5/5 will become useless since it is not required to be there at all in the first place thereby weakening the argument.

Would love to see your opinion.

Regards,
Dom.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 13 Jun 2012
Posts: 179
Location: United States
WE: Supply Chain Management (Computer Hardware)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2015, 03:33
Don't you think B is too vague.. B says samples sent "to urban centers of the East Coast" what if urban centers have less people and there other centers with more people (or say there are only 5 people in East cost, 1 in urban center and 4 in rural center) .Need some help please!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 May 2015
Posts: 100
GMAT 1: 630 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 670 Q44 V38
GMAT 3: 750 Q49 V44
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2015, 04:52
2
Turkish
The question starts with “A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway stations”, therefore I don’t think that "to urban centers of the East Coast" is vague at all, The company is clearly targeting customers in urban centers, since the advertisement is hanging on the subway stations.

dominicraj
I don’t think E weakens the argument. The fact that pesticides are “more needed in nursery homes” does not invalidates an argument saying "Let the new biological pesticide containing micro-organisms be your new best friend! Because it's used by 4 out of every 5 florists, you can be sure that this product will answer your pesticide needs.", it does not mean that they are not needed on florist shops as well.
They are using the “good statistic” of 80% of florists using their product in order to advertise it. Lets use another product to make the same comparison. Let’s say you have a laptop computer that is used by 4/5 of students, saying that it is more needed by engineers does not weakens an advertisement aimed to sell those notebooks for students.

The way I see it, “The company promoting the new biological pesticide sent free samples of it to all florists in the urban centers of the East Coast.” clearly weakens the argument by implying that the pesticide is only used because it was given to the florists for free, not because it was the best pesticide.

Hope it is clear now.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 385
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Oct 2015, 11:44
Mascarfi wrote:
Konstantin1983 wrote:
Still don't get why B is the correct answer. It talks about large sample size and this should strengthen the argument. I opted for E. Can anyone explain?


B is the correct answer because the fact that "it's used by 4 out of every 5 florists" is because it was given to them for free, and not because it is the best pesticide, making the argument that "this product will answer your pesticide needs." questionable.

I don't really see why E would weaken the argument.

Thanks Mascarfi!
Now i see. Key word is "free". Yes i agree
_________________

"Are you gangsters?" - "No we are Russians!"

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 May 2018
Posts: 1
Location: United States (GA)
Schools: Stanford '22
GRE 1: Q159 V151
GPA: 3.35
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)
CAT Tests
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2018, 18:22
I'm confused that B is the correct answer because the answer itself is based on an assumption. The assumption is that florists will use whatever pesticide they get for free. There is no basis to assume that is correct. I was voting for A, but I understand that the argument doesn't care about other areas other than the East Coast. So I would probably go for B, using Process Of Elimination, but I'm not 100% sold on it.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 02 Aug 2017
Posts: 43
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 590 Q42 V30
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V36
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V35
GMAT 5: 740 Q51 V39
GMAT 6: 740 Q49 V44
CAT Tests
Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2018, 09:08
I chose C, thinking it suggests that the mere use by florists isn't reliable indicator of pesticides' capability to meet the needs of florists.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________


Everything is in flux, nothing stays still

Re: A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio &nbs [#permalink] 24 Jul 2018, 09:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A new advertisement is hanging in many of the East Coast subway statio

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.