GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Jun 2018, 23:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A positive correlation has been found between the amount of soot

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
V
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 578
Location: United States (MA)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
A positive correlation has been found between the amount of soot [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2018, 00:29
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (01:44) correct 35% (02:01) wrong based on 99 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A positive correlation has been found between the amount of soot in the atmosphere of cities and the frequency of a certain ailment among those cities' populations. However, the soot itself probably does not cause this ailment, since in cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air, there are usually also high concentrations of many other air pollutants.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

(A) In cities where there are high concentrations of many air pollutants but little if any soot in the air, the frequency of the ailment is just as high, on average, as it is in cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air.
(B) If the ailment rarely occurs except in cities in which there are large amounts of soot in the air, then the soot is probably the cause of the ailment.
(C) In each of the cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air but little other air pollution, the frequency of the ailment is at least as high as it is anywhere else.
(D) If high concentrations of many different pollutants in a city's air are correlated with a high frequency of the ailment among that city's population, then it is possible that two or more of those pollutants each causally contributes to the ailment.
(E) In cities in which there are high concentrations of many air pollutants, there are generally also high concentrations of other forms of pollution that are very likely to contribute causally to the ailment.

LSAT

_________________

本当のライバルは昨日までの自分

Expert Post
examPAL Representative
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Mar 2017
Posts: 117
A positive correlation has been found between the amount of soot [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2018, 01:48
Akela wrote:
A positive correlation has been found between the amount of soot in the atmosphere of cities and the frequency of a certain ailment among those cities' populations. However, the soot itself probably does not cause this ailment, since in cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air, there are usually also high concentrations of many other air pollutants.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

(A) In cities where there are high concentrations of many air pollutants but little if any soot in the air, the frequency of the ailment is just as high, on average, as it is in cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air.
(B) If the ailment rarely occurs except in cities in which there are large amounts of soot in the air, then the soot is probably the cause of the ailment.
(C) In each of the cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air but little other air pollution, the frequency of the ailment is at least as high as it is anywhere else.
(D) If high concentrations of many different pollutants in a city's air are correlated with a high frequency of the ailment among that city's population, then it is possible that two or more of those pollutants each causally contributes to the ailment.
(E) In cities in which there are high concentrations of many air pollutants, there are generally also high concentrations of other forms of pollution that are very likely to contribute causally to the ailment.

LSAT


The answer is C.

Solving using logic: There are two correlations occurring at once: soot and sickness, and other air pollutants and sickness. The argument is that the second correlation indicates a causal relationship, and not the first one. What would weaken this is being told that the first correlation (soot-sickness) occurred without the first (air pollution): this is exactly what (C) tells us.

Solving by using the answers:
(A) In cities where there are high concentrations of many air pollutants but little if any soot in the air, the frequency of the ailment is just as high, on average, as it is in cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air. this strengthens the argument - air pollution is correlated with sickness, without soot
(B) If the ailment rarely occurs except in cities in which there are large amounts of soot in the air, then the soot is probably the cause of the ailment. There is not information here - it's an "if" sentence, not one that asserts anything
(C) In each of the cities where there are large amounts of soot in the air but little other air pollution, the frequency of the ailment is at least as high as it is anywhere else. so soot is correlated with the sickness without air pollutants - significantly weakens the argument that other air pollutants are causing the ailment
(D) If high concentrations of many different pollutants in a city's air are correlated with a high frequency of the ailment among that city's population, then it is possible that two or more of those pollutants each causally contributes to the ailment. Like B - no information here!
(E) In cities in which there are high concentrations of many air pollutants, there are generally also high concentrations of other forms of pollution that are very likely to contribute causally to the ailment. strengthens the statement that soot is not the cause
_________________

Dave Green
Senior tutor at examPAL
Signup for a free GMAT course
Image[/url]
Image

A positive correlation has been found between the amount of soot   [#permalink] 19 Jan 2018, 01:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A positive correlation has been found between the amount of soot

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.