Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 18 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn an intuitive, systematic approach that will maximize your success on Fillintheblank GMAT CR Questions. Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Oct 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join an exclusive interview with the people behind the test. If you're taking the GMAT, this is a webinar you cannot afford to miss!
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58453

A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Feb 2018, 00:48
Question Stats:
82% (03:03) correct 18% (02:04) wrong based on 28 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with Team K that provided for an annual salary of $100,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 20% over the previous year for the next two years, and a bonus of $50,000 on signing. Team L offered a threeyear contract providing for an annual salary of $150,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 10% over the previous year for the next two years, and no signing bonus. If he accepts the offer of Team L and fulfills the threeyear contract terms, the athlete will receive how much more money by choosing Team L over Team if? (A) $32,500 (B) $50,000 (C) $82,500 (D) $92,000 (E) $100,000
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2016
Posts: 15

Re: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Feb 2018, 01:14
I go with Answer. C
Team K First Year: 100K + 50K Second Year: 120K Third Year: 144k
Total: 414K
Team L First Year: 150K Second Year: 165K Third Year: 181.5K
Total: 496.K
Difference: 82.5K
Hence Answer C.



Intern
Joined: 03 Jun 2015
Posts: 21
GPA: 3.58
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Feb 2018, 02:20
Bunuel wrote: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with Team K that provided for an annual salary of $100,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 20% over the previous year for the next two years, and a bonus of $50,000 on signing. Team L offered a threeyear contract providing for an annual salary of $150,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 10% over the previous year for the next two years, and no signing bonus. If he accepts the offer of Team L and fulfills the threeyear contract terms, the athlete will receive how much more money by choosing Team L over Team if?
(A) $32,500
(B) $50,000
(C) $82,500
(D) $92,000
(E) $100,000 Renumeration offered by : Team K : 100,000 + 1.2*100,000 +1.2* 1.2*100,000 + 50,000 = 100,000(1+1.2+1.44+0.5)= 100,000*4.14 = 414,000 (1) Team L : 150,000 + 1.1*150,000 + 1.1*1.1*150,000 = 150,000(1+1.1+1.21) = 150,000*3.31= 496500 (2) Answer = (2)  (1) = 496500414000 = 825000 Answer is C.
_________________
A dream doesn't become reality through magic; it takes sweat, determination and hard work.



VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1230

A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 01 Feb 2018, 10:47
Bunuel wrote: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with Team K that provided for an annual salary of $100,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 20% over the previous year for the next two years, and a bonus of $50,000 on signing. Team L offered a threeyear contract providing for an annual salary of $150,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 10% over the previous year for the next two years, and no signing bonus. If he accepts the offer of Team L and fulfills the threeyear contract terms, the athlete will receive how much more money by choosing Team L over Team if?
(A) $32,500
(B) $50,000
(C) $82,500
(D) $92,000
(E) $100,000 Ok, GMAT quant party starts here A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with Team K that provided for an annual salary of $100,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 20% over the previous year for the next two years, and a bonus of $50,000 on signing Hello! Yes, you ! please read below and correct my mistake! i am using formula , and exponent meant number of years x = \(100, 000 (1+0,20)^2\) x = 100,000*1.44 = 144,000 +bonus 50,000 = 194,000 x = \(150,000 (1+0,1)^2\) x = 150,000 * 1,21 x= 181,500 194,000  181,500 = 12,500 so why this formula doesnt work ?
Originally posted by dave13 on 01 Feb 2018, 10:44.
Last edited by dave13 on 01 Feb 2018, 10:47, edited 1 time in total.



VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1230

Re: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Feb 2018, 10:46
dave13 wrote: Bunuel wrote: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with Team K that provided for an annual salary of $100,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 20% over the previous year for the next two years, and a bonus of $50,000 on signing. Team L offered a threeyear contract providing for an annual salary of $150,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 10% over the previous year for the next two years, and no signing bonus. If he accepts the offer of Team L and fulfills the threeyear contract terms, the athlete will receive how much more money by choosing Team L over Team if?
(A) $32,500
(B) $50,000
(C) $82,500
(D) $92,000
(E) $100,000 Ok, GMAT quant party starts here Hello! Yes, you ! please read below and correct my mistake! i am using formula , and exponent meant number of years x = \(100, 000 (1+0,20)^2\) x = 100,000*1.44 = 144,000 +bonus 50,000 = 194,000 x = \(150,000 (1+0,1)^2\) x = 150,000 * 1,21 x= 181,500 194,000  181,500 = 12,500 so why this formula doesnt work ?



Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 3554

A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Feb 2018, 18:04
dave13 wrote: dave13 wrote: Bunuel wrote: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with Team K that provided for an annual salary of $100,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 20% over the previous year for the next two years, and a bonus of $50,000 on signing. Team L offered a threeyear contract providing for an annual salary of $150,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 10% over the previous year for the next two years, and no signing bonus. If he accepts the offer of Team L and fulfills the threeyear contract terms, the athlete will receive how much more money by choosing Team L over Team if?
(A) $32,500
(B) $50,000
(C) $82,500
(D) $92,000
(E) $100,000 Ok, GMAT quant party starts here Hello! Yes, you ! please read below and correct my mistake! i am using formula , and exponent meant number of years x = \(100, 000 (1+0,20)^2\) x = 100,000*1.44 = 144,000 +bonus 50,000 = 194,000 x = \(150,000 (1+0,1)^2\) x = 150,000 * 1,21 x= 181,500 194,000  181,500 = 12,500 so why this formula doesnt work ? Hi dave13 , Well, the formula didn't work because you calculated only his Year 3 salary (correctly, I might add). You have to add the money he makes in Year 1 and Year 2. Let's use Team K's deal. You calculated Year 3 correctly: $144,000 You have to add Year 1 = 100,000 Year 2 = 120,000 (= 100,000 * 1.2) Year 3 = 144,000 (=100,00*1.44 OR 120,000*1.2) Bonus = 50,000  TOTAL = $414,000 for Team K's deal Now do the same for Team L Year 1: Year 2: >(=150,000 * ____) Year 3: $181,500 (= 150,000 * 1.21) You've calculated a final amount FOR YEAR 3 based on accrued "interest" (really, just a percent increase) on initial salary  but compounding interest, while cumulative, is not "additive" in the sense it needs to be here. Hope that helps.
_________________
SC Butler has resumed! Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date, here.Instructions for living a life. Pay attention. Be astonished. Tell about it.  Mary Oliver



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 8104
Location: United States (CA)

Re: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Feb 2018, 12:19
Bunuel wrote: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with Team K that provided for an annual salary of $100,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 20% over the previous year for the next two years, and a bonus of $50,000 on signing. Team L offered a threeyear contract providing for an annual salary of $150,000 in the first year, an increase in annual salary of 10% over the previous year for the next two years, and no signing bonus. If he accepts the offer of Team L and fulfills the threeyear contract terms, the athlete will receive how much more money by choosing Team L over Team if?
(A) $32,500
(B) $50,000
(C) $82,500
(D) $92,000
(E) $100,000 Let’s first determine the contract for Team K. 100,000 + 1.2(100,000) + 1.2 x 1.2(100,000) + 50,000 150,000 + 120,000 + 144,000 = 414,000 Let’s now determine the contract for team L. 150,000 + 1.1(150,000) + 1.1 x 1.1(150,000) 150,000 + 165,000 + 181,500 = 496,500 Thus, the difference is 496,500  414,000 = 82,500. Answer: C
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.




Re: A professional athlete was offered a threeyear contract to play with
[#permalink]
02 Feb 2018, 12:19






