Last visit was: 22 Jul 2024, 23:36 It is currently 22 Jul 2024, 23:36
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 485 [18]
Given Kudos: 14
GPA: 8.4
Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 228
Own Kudos [?]: 744 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: Texas
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 305
Own Kudos [?]: 114 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V40
Director
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 769
Own Kudos [?]: 277 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
Different type of ques havent seen before....

A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors' of the likelihood of premature death. Two of these factors were a sedentary lifestyle without regular physical exercise, and sleeping more than 12 hours daily.
If a person, who is trying to avoid premature death, were to respond to this news by both joining an exercise club and buying an alarm clock, that person would probably be:

A) mistaking an explanation for an argument.

B) mistaking an argument for an explanation.

C) mistaking a premise for a conclusion.

D) mistaking a cause for an indicator.

E) mistaking an indicator for a cause.

C should be the correct answer

Please correct me if i am wrong.....
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1108
Own Kudos [?]: 4754 [2]
Given Kudos: 376
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
2
Kudos
prateekbhatt wrote:
Different type of ques havent seen before....

A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors' of the likelihood of premature death. Two of these factors were a sedentary lifestyle without regular physical exercise, and sleeping more than 12 hours daily.

If a person, who is trying to avoid premature death, were to respond to this news by both joining an exercise club and buying an alarm clock, that person would probably be:

A) mistaking an explanation for an argument.

B) mistaking an argument for an explanation.

C) mistaking a premise for a conclusion.

D) mistaking a cause for an indicator.

E) mistaking an indicator for a cause.

C should be the correct answer

Please correct me if i am wrong.....

The person is not mistaking the premise for a conclusion. The person is DERIVING wrong conclusion from incomplete PREMISE.

Firstly, the NEWSPAPER mentioned SEVERAL, not ALL of the factors of premature death.
Then, the PREMISE mentions only two FACTORS out of the SEVERAL factors of premature death.

These two factors are just a small subset.
The person could mitigate the risk by doing as suggested in the stem, but he/she can't avoid the risk.

"E" is the most appropriate of the lot.
Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 155 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Location: New Delhi, India
Concentration: Marketing
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
RohitKalla wrote:
A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors' of the likelihood of premature death. Two of these factors were a sedentary lifestyle without regular physical exercise, and sleeping more than 12 hours daily.
If a person, who is trying to avoid premature death, were to respond to this news by both joining an exercise club and buying an alarm clock, that person would probably be:

A) mistaking an explanation for an argument.

B) mistaking an argument for an explanation.

C) mistaking a premise for a conclusion.

D) mistaking a cause for an indicator.

E) mistaking an indicator for a cause.

E wins because.
The conclustior(cause) reached by the person on the basis of indicator( bad more sleeping and less exercise)
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 162 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
A sedentary lifestyle without regular physical exercise, and sleeping more than 12 hours daily - Two of the several INDICATORS for premeture death which is the CAUSE

Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 133
Own Kudos [?]: 121 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
The tone of the question should even give one a clue about the right answer. It seems our longevity seeker, despite his efforts, is mistaking an indicator for a cause. If he weren't, then we cannot even have a GMAT question in the first place.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as [#permalink]
5. A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors' of the likelihood of premature death. Two of these factors were a sedentary lifestyle without regular physical exercise, and sleeping more than 12 hours daily.
If a person, who is trying to avoid premature death, were to respond to this news by both joining an exercise club and buying an alarm clock, that person would probably be:
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2402
Own Kudos [?]: 15325 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as [#permalink]
fkayivi wrote:
5. A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors' of the likelihood of premature death. Two of these factors were a sedentary lifestyle without regular physical exercise, and sleeping more than 12 hours daily.
If a person, who is trying to avoid premature death, were to respond to this news by both joining an exercise club and buying an alarm clock, that person would probably be:

The passage uses the word "factors", implying that sedentary lifestyle and sleepiing more than 12 hours may cause premature death. Thus these two are causes. They are not explanations: eliminate A, not arguments: eliminate B, not premises: eliminate C, not indicators: eliminate E. They are causes: retain D. However the person did not mistake the causes for indicators; on the contrary he recognised the causes and took precautionary meaures. Hence Option D is also wrong.

The question seems to be flawed.
Manager
Joined: 19 Sep 2016
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 292
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
Why is it E and not D. It should be mistaking a cause for an indicator since they are indicators.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17525
Own Kudos [?]: 869 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: A recent newspaper feature story listed several factors as 'predictors [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6991 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts