hashim88
12 must be in the set but why 24 has to be in th set?
Posted from my mobile deviceThe only numbers that are specifically stated to be members of the set are 2 and 6. Since the product of these two numbers is 2 × 6 = 12, the number 12 must also be in the set. Because 12 is in the set, eliminate any choice that does not include Roman Number II. Therefore, eliminate choices A and B. The two remaining possibilities are 3 and 24. Determine whether products of the three numbers now known to be in the set can be made to form 3 or 24. Since 2 × 12 = 24, 24 is in the set. Eliminate any choice that does not include Roman Number III, so eliminate choices C and D. Only one choice remains, so there is no need to go further. However, to understand why 3 does not need to be in the set, remember that if two numbers are in the set, their product is also in the set. The reverse is not true. If a number is in the set, there is no reason to assume that its factors are in the set. The only way to prove that 3 must be in the set would be to have 2 numbers whose product is 3 already in the set. Since this is not the case, 3 need not be in the set and the correct answer is choice E.