January 20, 2019 January 20, 2019 07:00 AM PST 07:00 AM PST Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. January 19, 2019 January 19, 2019 07:00 AM PST 09:00 AM PST Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1390

A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2008, 01:02
Question Stats:
33% (02:39) correct 67% (02:45) wrong based on 232 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is written on the blackboard. A student came along and erased one number. The average of the remaining numbers is 35 7/17. What was the number erased? A. 7 B. 8 C. 9 D. 15 E. 17
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 13353
Location: United States (CA)

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jan 2015, 12:31
Hi All, This question is layered with subtle "clues" as to how you can find the correct answer: 1) We're asked which number was removed from the list and the answers ARE numbers. We can use them against the prompt. 2) The average of the new group of numbers is 35 7/17. The denominator of THAT fraction tells us that the total number of terms in the new list MUST be a multiple of 17: 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, etc. 3) Since we're removing 1 number from a list of consecutive positive integers, we could quickly limit down the possible number of terms in the ORIGINAL list: If new = 17, old = 18, but the numbers from 1 to 18 would NOT have an average in the mid30s (it would be much smaller). ELIMINATE this option. If new = 34, old = 35, but we run into the same problem. The average won't match here either. ELIMINATE this option. If new = 51, old = 52, same problem here. ELIMINATE this option. If new = 68, old = 69....HERE we have a group of numbers that might just be what we're looking for. In the "old group", the average is the "middle term" = 35, which is REALLY close to the new average once we remove a number. Now, we just have to figure out which of the 5 answers was removed (and that changed the new average to 35 7/17). There are a couple of ways to do this math, but I'm going to use the answers to save myself some steps: Sum of 1 to 69, inclusive = 69(35) = 2415 Remove Answer B....2415  8 = 2407 New average = 2407/68 = 35 27/68 Now, we can compare 27/68 to 7/17 27/68 and 28/68 This is REALLY close, but is not the answer. Eliminate B. The answer is either A or C. Since 28/68 is a BIGGER fraction than 27/68, we need the sum (of the 68 integers) to be BIGGER...which means we need to remove a SMALLER number. Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/
*****Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*****




Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2014
Posts: 1

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Nov 2014, 10:48
A better and easier method is as follows: First of all, when ever a number is deleted from consecutive numbers, avg cant change more than 1/2. So in this case new avg is 35 7/17, so old average was 35. Now, 35 is avg of first 69 numbers, so previously there were 69 num, and now there are 68(after deletion). Now, 7/17 = 28/68 . So effectively, the number which was deleted gave 28/68 to each 68 num left, so the number should have been 28 less than 35(old avg) Ans= 3528=7. Advantage with this method is that you can do it verbally.




Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 152

Re: PS: Average
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2008, 02:38
This one sure looks tricky. I am not able to reach the solution, but this is what i think. I am sure you must have done all this by now, but no harm in putting it down. 35 7/17 , means 602/17 , earlier i thought there must be 18 numbers, which is 17 + 1 that is taken out. But if there were, then their sum is 171 which is far too low. The average of 35 shows that the numbers were little higher, ( their sum should be 602 ) . The answer choices are very low numbers. I don't know how this is possible at all.
Sorry mate, i really doubt if the qs is correct ! Can you pls provide the source of this qs and check whether the numbers you mentioned are all correct ?



Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 111

Re: PS: Average
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2008, 02:43
My method, I may not use this during the test, so i will still wait for another better solution.
set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1, if n is the last number => SUM(1) = n(n+1)/2
If 1 number was taken out, so the SUM(2) then will be (n  1) * average = (n  1) * (35 + 7/17)
As SUM(2) is an integer so (n1) is divisible by 17, the original average is in this range (34+7/17, 36 + 7/17) => n is in (2*(34+7/17), 2*(36 + 7/17)) or n is in (68.8, 72.8)
(n1) is divisible by 17 and n is in (68.8, 72.8) => n = 69
The number was erased = SUM(1)  SUM(2) = 69*70/2  (691) * (35 + 7/17) = 7
Answer: A



VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1413

Re: PS: Average
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2008, 03:03
lylya4 wrote: My method, I may not use this during the test, so i will still wait for another better solution.
set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1, if n is the last number => SUM(1) = n(n+1)/2
If 1 number was taken out, so the SUM(2) then will be (n  1) * average = (n  1) * (35 + 7/17)
As SUM(2) is an integer so (n1) is divisible by 17, the original average is in this range (34+7/17, 36 + 7/17) => n is in (2*(34+7/17), 2*(36 + 7/17)) or n is in (68.8, 72.8)
(n1) is divisible by 17 and n is in (68.8, 72.8) => n = 69
The number was erased = SUM(1)  SUM(2) = 69*70/2  (691) * (35 + 7/17) = 7
Answer: A Could you elaborate the highlighted step further?



Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 111

Re: PS: Average
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2008, 03:42
scthakur wrote: lylya4 wrote: My method, I may not use this during the test, so i will still wait for another better solution.
set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1, if n is the last number => SUM(1) = n(n+1)/2
If 1 number was taken out, so the SUM(2) then will be (n  1) * average = (n  1) * (35 + 7/17)
As SUM(2) is an integer so (n1) is divisible by 17, the original average is in this range (34+7/17, 36 + 7/17) => n is in (2*(34+7/17), 2*(36 + 7/17)) or n is in (68.8, 72.8)
(n1) is divisible by 17 and n is in (68.8, 72.8) => n = 69
The number was erased = SUM(1)  SUM(2) = 69*70/2  (691) * (35 + 7/17) = 7
Answer: A Could you elaborate the highlighted step further? SUM (2) = (n  1) * (35 + 7/17) = 35(n1) + 7/17(n1) as SUM(2) is an integer => 7/17(n1) is integer or n1 is divisible by 17 The range for the original average is just for to limit the result of n, if the largest number n was taken out, the average will be decreased at max n / (n1) = 1 + 1/(n1) ~ 1, so to be safe I place the range for this average +1 to 35 7/17. This step can be ignored, instead we know that the average is ~35, so n should be around ~70 (average for consecutive integers = (n + 1)/2)



Director
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 533
Concentration: International Business, Technology

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jan 2015, 10:24
BunuelCould you please help on this one ? this part is little confusing to me. . The range for the original average is just for to limit the result of n, if the largest number n was taken out, the average will be decreased at max n / (n1) = 1 + 1/(n1) ~ 1, so to be safe I place the range for this average +1 to 35 7/17. This step can be ignored, instead we know that the average is ~35, so n should be around ~70 (average for consecutive integers = (n + 1)/2) thanks



Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 8

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Apr 2015, 22:33
EMPOWERgmatRichC wrote: Hi All, This question is layered with subtle "clues" as to how you can find the correct answer: 1) We're asked which number was removed from the list and the answers ARE numbers. We can use them against the prompt. 2) The average of the new group of numbers is 35 7/17. The denominator of THAT fraction tells us that the total number of terms in the new list MUST be a multiple of 17: 17, 34, 51, 68, 85, etc. 3) Since we're removing 1 number from a list of consecutive positive integers, we could quickly limit down the possible number of terms in the ORIGINAL list: If new = 17, old = 18, but the numbers from 1 to 18 would NOT have an average in the mid30s (it would be much smaller). ELIMINATE this option. If new = 34, old = 35, but we run into the same problem. The average won't match here either. ELIMINATE this option. If new = 51, old = 52, same problem here. ELIMINATE this option. If new = 68, old = 69....HERE we have a group of numbers that might just be what we're looking for. In the "old group", the average is the "middle term" = 35, which is REALLY close to the new average once we remove a number. Now, we just have to figure out which of the 5 answers was removed (and that changed the new average to 35 7/17). There are a couple of ways to do this math, but I'm going to use the answers to save myself some steps: Sum of 1 to 69, inclusive = 69(35) = 2415 Remove Answer B....2415  8 = 2407 New average = 2407/68 = 35 27/68 Now, we can compare 27/68 to 7/17 27/68 and 28/68 This is REALLY close, but is not the answer. Eliminate B. The answer is either A or C. Since 28/68 is a BIGGER fraction than 27/68, we need the sum (of the 68 integers) to be BIGGER...which means we need to remove a SMALLER number. Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich Thanks for providing this easy to understand solution. Just one step which can reduce effort at the end 69*35 = 2415 and our earlier average is 35 7/17 = 602/17, we know total numbers here in this case (after one got erased is 68) so 4*602/4*17 = 2408/68. now since total should have been 2415, the deleted number is 24152408=7



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8795
Location: Pune, India

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Jul 2016, 21:36
tarek99 wrote: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is written on the blackboard. A student came along and erased one number. The average of the remaining numbers is 35 7/17. What was the number erased?
A. 7 B. 8 C. 9 D. 15 E. 17 The average of consecutive positive integers will be either an integer (if we have odd number of integers) or integer.5 (if we have even number of integers). The maximum change that can happen to the average when one integer is deleted is 0.5. New average = 35 (7/17) Old average = Either 35 or 35.5 So there were either 69 consecutive integers starting from 1 (in which case avg was 35) or 70 consecutive integers starting from 1 (in which case avg was 35.5) . If the average was 35 (and number of integers was 69) and it increased to 35 (7/17), it means a small number was removed which was taking the average down by 7/17 for the rest of the 68 numbers. So it must be 68 *(7/17) = 28 less than the average. That is, the number removed must have been 35  28 = 7. It is one of the options so answer (A). For more details on this method, check: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2015/09 ... thegmat/
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 83
GPA: 3.92
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2017, 13:47
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: tarek99 wrote: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is written on the blackboard. A student came along and erased one number. The average of the remaining numbers is 35 7/17. What was the number erased?
A. 7 B. 8 C. 9 D. 15 E. 17 The average of consecutive positive integers will be either an integer (if we have odd number of integers) or integer.5 (if we have even number of integers). The maximum change that can happen to the average when one integer is deleted is 0.5. New average = 35 (7/17) Old average = Either 35 or 35.5 So there were either 69 consecutive integers starting from 1 (in which case avg was 35) or 70 consecutive integers starting from 1 (in which case avg was 35.5) . If the average was 35 (and number of integers was 69) and it increased to 35 (7/17), it means a small number was removed which was taking the average down by 7/17 for the rest of the 68 numbers. So it must be 68 *(7/17) = 28 less than the average. That is, the number removed must have been 35  28 = 7. It is one of the options so answer (A). For more details on this method, check: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2015/09 ... thegmat/ VeritasPrepKarishmaSay the number removed from the consecutive integer set actually decreased the average by 7/17, then would we need to add 35 & 28?
_________________
If you analyze enough data, you can predict the future.....its calculating probability, nothing more!



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8795
Location: Pune, India

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2017, 22:45
colorblind wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: tarek99 wrote: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is written on the blackboard. A student came along and erased one number. The average of the remaining numbers is 35 7/17. What was the number erased?
A. 7 B. 8 C. 9 D. 15 E. 17 The average of consecutive positive integers will be either an integer (if we have odd number of integers) or integer.5 (if we have even number of integers). The maximum change that can happen to the average when one integer is deleted is 0.5. New average = 35 (7/17) Old average = Either 35 or 35.5 So there were either 69 consecutive integers starting from 1 (in which case avg was 35) or 70 consecutive integers starting from 1 (in which case avg was 35.5) . If the average was 35 (and number of integers was 69) and it increased to 35 (7/17), it means a small number was removed which was taking the average down by 7/17 for the rest of the 68 numbers. So it must be 68 *(7/17) = 28 less than the average. That is, the number removed must have been 35  28 = 7. It is one of the options so answer (A). For more details on this method, check: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2015/09 ... thegmat/ VeritasPrepKarishmaSay the number removed from the consecutive integer set actually decreased the average by 7/17, then would we need to add 35 & 28? I am not sure what you intend to keep and what you intend to change but if the previous avg was 35 (which means 69 integers) and by removing one integer, the average reduces by 7/17, it means the number was providing 7/17 to each of the other 68 numbers i.e. (7/17)*68 = 28. So the number removed must be 28 more than the average 35 and hence must be 35 + 28 = 63.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2017
Posts: 1

A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jul 2017, 01:26
For the avg to be around 35 you need first 69 terms. N(N+1)/2*N=35 implies N to be 69.
The new avg is 35 + 7/17. It could also be written as 35 + 28/68.
If the avg had to be maintained (35) the number 35 would have been erased. But since the one erased gives 28 to the remaining lot (to remaining 68 numbers)
The answer should be 3528=7 Because 7 is the only number which would have taken an additional 28 from the entire lot to keep the avg 35.
When erased it gives that extra 28 back to group of 68.
Posted from my mobile device



Intern
Joined: 13 Jan 2016
Posts: 9

Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Aug 2018, 17:07
a much better and easier method is this one : let suppose consecutive integer 1 , 2 ,..... n , n+1 Now in new case n+1 is remove remaining are n consecutive integers whose AM is 357/17 so n ( n+1)/2 = 357/17 ( sum of consecutive integers = total integers (n) * ( first term + last term)/2 n(n+1) = 42 n^2 + n 42 = 0 (n6)(n+7) = 0 n cannot be negative so n =6 hence ( n+1) the number removed must be 6 + 1 = 7




Re: A set of consecutive positive integers beginning with 1 is &nbs
[#permalink]
05 Aug 2018, 17:07






