GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 08 Dec 2019, 14:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper.

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Gathering chakra
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Posts: 440
A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2019, 09:09
4
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:10) correct 44% (01:17) wrong based on 62 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper. If the paper was cut so as to yield a sign of the greatest possible area, then what is the area of the remaining piece (or pieces) of paper?

(1) The rectangular piece of paper originally had dimensions 16 inches by 24 inches.

(2) The height of the triangle is 16 inches.

General question to experts: To double check... If the GMAT says a figure is a rectangle in DS prompt, is it still possible for it to be a square given new information in the statements? To yield the greatest possible area it would be an equilateral triangle in a square vs. a right triangle in a rectangle. So if (1) said the dimensions are 16 by 16 we are still able to figure it out from just 1) but this fact could be very important in another problem, right?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 5448
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Re: A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2019, 20:56
energetics wrote:
A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper. If the paper was cut so as to yield a sign of the greatest possible area, then what is the area of the remaining piece (or pieces) of paper?

(1) The rectangular piece of paper originally had dimensions 16 inches by 24 inches.

(2) The height of the triangle is 16 inches.

General question to experts: To double check... If the GMAT says a figure is a rectangle in DS prompt, is it still possible for it to be a square given new information in the statements? To yield the greatest possible area it would be an equilateral triangle in a square vs. a right triangle in a rectangle. So if (1) said the dimensions are 16 by 16 we are still able to figure it out from just 1) but this fact could be very important in another problem, right?

for a rectangle to be cut to get max ∆ area is to cut it diagonally
#1
rectangle dimensions are given ; sufficiet to determine the diagonal ; √16^2+24^2
sufficient
#2
height given but no info of length
insufficient
IMO A
Senior Manager
Status: Gathering chakra
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Posts: 440
A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2019, 12:13
To answer the question I posed above (maybe not seen in the spoiler):

In a rectangle or square it doesn't matter what kind of triangle as long as it touches the vertexes of the base and the opposite side since b*h/2 will always be the same. The only thing that won't work is an equilateral since it won't fit in the dimensions or won't touch both the vertexes opposite side.

Separately, when given an Area, Perimeter of an equilateral is less than right/isosceles
When given equivalent Perimeter, the Area of an equilateral is more than isosceles/right

Bunuel VeritasKarishma Hopefully I'm correct in my understanding.
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2018
Posts: 70
Location: India
Schools: Stern '22 (II)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Re: A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper.  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2019, 08:38
1
energetics wrote:
A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper. If the paper was cut so as to yield a sign of the greatest possible area, then what is the area of the remaining piece (or pieces) of paper?

(1) The rectangular piece of paper originally had dimensions 16 inches by 24 inches.

(2) The height of the triangle is 16 inches.

General question to experts: To double check... If the GMAT says a figure is a rectangle in DS prompt, is it still possible for it to be a square given new information in the statements? To yield the greatest possible area it would be an equilateral triangle in a square vs. a right triangle in a rectangle. So if (1) said the dimensions are 16 by 16 we are still able to figure it out from just 1) but this fact could be very important in another problem, right?

Given a rectangle we can easily calculate the triangle with max area and that will be the two congruent triangles (each of) its diagonal makes. The area of the triangle in that case is 1/2*breadth*length of rectangle. And the area of the remaining piece of paper is also 1/2*breadth*length of rectangle.

From 1) We know the dimensions of the rectangle. Sufficient
Please note that given exact dimensions of any shape be it rectangle, circle or square, or any irregular polygon, we can be sure that max area for a triangle is constant as there is only one max area; even though there may be different ways to make that triangle. This is therefore clearly sufficient.

From 2) We just know the height of the triangle. Had we known the base as well, we could have calculated the area of the remaining piece/ pieces of paper. Because no matter how you cut the triangle, the max area of the triangle as well as the remaining pieces of paper are same and they are equal to 1/2*breadth*length of rectangle. Insufficient.

Please note that for all types of rectangle, even square the max area of the triangle is 1/2*breadth*length.
Area of equilateral triangle made from a square (of side measuring "a" each) is as below:
base= a and height=$$\frac{\sqrt{3}a}{2}$$
Therefore, Area of an equilateral triangle cut from a square is= $$\frac{1}{2}*a*\frac{\sqrt{3}a}{2}$$=$$\frac{\sqrt{3}a^2}{4}$$=$$\frac{1.73a^2}{4}$$
Whereas, if we cut the square in two equal pieces through the diagonal, the area of each of the two triangles made is $$\frac{a^2}{2}$$ each, which is clearly greater than $$\frac{1.73a^2}{4}$$.

Kudos help discussion in the forum. Kingly help with +1 Kudos whenever you feel your knowledge has been enriched with a query or an explanation.
Re: A triangular sign was cut from a rectangular piece of paper.   [#permalink] 04 May 2019, 08:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by