, is "declined" in option C not a verb-ed modifier? Population cannot do the action of "declined" right?
Quote:
B. From 2007 to 2014, Africa’s elephant population has declined by nearly a third, mostly due to poaching.
Nightmare007, the issue with "due to" is that it can only modify a noun, not a verb. In (B), the phrase "mostly due to poaching" is trying to modify "has declined" -- and that's a verb. So "due to" is wrong in this case. A full thread on "due to" can be found here:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/due-to-vs-be ... 40393.htmlThis isn't really a meaning issue, though: it arguably makes logical sense to say "caused by" or "due to" here, but "due to" is grammatically incorrect. You'll often hear that you can just replace "due to" with "caused by", but that's a little shortcut that doesn't always work for everybody. If you're OK with the grammatical explanation, that's much more reliable. (The shortcut tends to work for native speakers who don't really know anything about English grammar. Since we stopped teaching grammar in the U.S. a couple of generations ago, that shortcut can be great for Americans -- but most people are probably better off without it.)