Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 05:03 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 05:03

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 282
Own Kudos [?]: 1219 [37]
Given Kudos: 139
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 282
Own Kudos [?]: 1219 [10]
Given Kudos: 139
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Send PM
General Discussion
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1174
Own Kudos [?]: 20717 [3]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 531
Own Kudos [?]: 2284 [2]
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
JusTLucK04 wrote:
After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into European markets for the first time, it found that it was unable to achieve any appreciable market share. To combat this problem, Company K re-released the product under a new name with great fanfare and a substantial marketing budget, calling it the“new low-fat alternative to butter.”
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the effectiveness of the solution proposed above?
(A) In many European countries, satisfactory taste and low-fat content are believed to be entirely contradictory.
(B) The market for yellow fats such as margarine and butter has been slowly shrinking in many European countries due to the emergence of specialized cheese spreads.
(C) Company K could only feasibly maintain such a marketing budget for 10 to 12 months before scaling down the campaign.
(D) After Company K attempted a similar marketing strategy in South America, sales of the new product greatly increased.
(E) In Denmark, the new low-fat butter substitute achieved a market share of 15% within the first year – without any massive marketing campaign.

Kudos for the question


Situation: Company K introduced Low fat butter but failed to gain appreciable market share and went back renamed it is the new low fat butter with the intention of winning the market share.

We need to find a weakner which will question the proposed solution

Option C is irrelevant here.
Option D if any gives strengthens the proposal
In option E, points to a one of the markets where the product did well and if any agains strengthens the proposal

We are left with option A and B
Option B gives us an information which if true will weaken the solution proposed off. Having said that we need to find the information which will cast MOST DOUBT. A does that best

Ans is A
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 282
Own Kudos [?]: 1219 [1]
Given Kudos: 139
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
1
Kudos
aditya8062 wrote:
Quote:
Just to add a subtle but important difference everyone is missing..B is all about the market and our argument is revolving around market share..so B is out :-D :-D


is it some kind of a explanation that u have written because this is not the reason as why B stands out .the fact is B is presenting two opposing views .the argument is about "low fat butter" .now B talks about the shrinking market of both "butter" (normal butter) and "margarine"(a kind of low fat butter) . u cannot make out from B as which market is effectively gaining or loosing !!


I don't think the knowledge of butter is a prerequisite to answer this question..Consider that markets for all kind of fats are shrinking..Now as the market for all kind of fats is shrinking..it is reasonable to believe that the market for the alternatives for these fats is also shrinking..Though not necessary..I see no contrasting views here
Secondly,the reason that B is incorrect is that even though the market as a whole is reducing..the company aims to gain maximum market share..so it helps us nowhere..

And this BTW is the OE..
Hope its clear
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Quote:
Just to add a subtle but important difference everyone is missing..B is all about the market and our argument is revolving around market share..so B is out :-D :-D


This is the correct explanation for ruling out B. The information regarding whether the market is expanding or shrinking doesn't help us in determining why company K's product isn't gaining market share. So it doesn't cast a doubt on the effectiveness of the new solution.

Quote:
is it some kind of a explanation that u have written because this is not the reason as why B stands out .the fact is B is presenting two opposing views .the argument is about "low fat butter" .now B talks about the shrinking market of both "butter" (normal butter) and "margarine"(a kind of low fat butter) . u cannot make out from B as which market is effectively gaining or loosing !!


B does tell us that market for both butter and margarine is shrinking, but that knowledge doesn't help us, as explained above. Therefore, B can be ruled out.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 246
Own Kudos [?]: 945 [1]
Given Kudos: 410
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE:General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
1
Kudos
alphaseeker wrote:
I still dont think the A is the right choice. Anywhere in the passage, the author does not mention anything related to consumer preferences, taste in particular. Yet, in choice B, there is a real alternative that consumers have began drifting to...
The company will focus on being an alternative, but there is already one. So, i think the choice b is the most doubting argument for the plan.



B says that the market for alternatives to butter is increasing. This supports the strategy of the company because the company re-launched its low fat butter under the garb of the low -fat alternative to butter.

Whereas A highlights the fact , that it may be the taste and not the low-fat thing that is responsible for the failure of the initial launch.

We have to create a doubt on the success of the plan and A does create doubt .

Hope the above helps!!


I donot mind Kudos..
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Posts: 88
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GRE 1: Q750 V600
GPA: 3.26
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
1
Kudos
JusTLucK04 wrote:
After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into European markets for the first time, it found that it was unable to achieve any appreciable market share. To combat this problem, Company K re-released the product under a new name with great fanfare and a substantial marketing budget, calling it the“new low-fat alternative to butter.”
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the effectiveness of the solution proposed above?
(A) In many European countries, satisfactory taste and low-fat content are believed to be entirely contradictory.
(B) The market for yellow fats such as margarine and butter has been slowly shrinking in many European countries due to the emergence of specialized cheese spreads.
(C) Company K could only feasibly maintain such a marketing budget for 10 to 12 months before scaling down the campaign.
(D) After Company K attempted a similar marketing strategy in South America, sales of the new product greatly increased.
(E) In Denmark, the new low-fat butter substitute achieved a market share of 15% within the first year – without any massive marketing campaign.

Kudos for the question


I was stuck between A and E. However the argument does not say anything about the taste to market share relation which would weaken the effectiveness of the solution.
I concluded with E because it presents another case where the substitute worked without any marketing campaign. This should show that it is not about the marketing campaign.

Please tell where am I wrong.

mikemcgarry
Please see if you can provide valuable inputs.
User avatar
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 654 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
1
Kudos
The emphasis is on the tag line with which the product was marketed.The tag line clearly says "new low-fat alternative to butter" which implies that nothing other than the fat content is different from butter. Hence if the product tastes different from butter and there is a general belief that there is a correlation between taste and fat content it will not go in favor of the product at all. "A" suggests the same. In "E" whatever is applicable to Denmark may not be applicable to all European countries. Hence there is an analogical flaw.So "E" is ruled out.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Status:The best is yet to come.....
Posts: 397
Own Kudos [?]: 832 [1]
Given Kudos: 235
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
1
Kudos
hazelnut wrote:
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo, Could you please help to explain in a simple language? I could not understand why B is incorrect and why A is the correct answer.

Let me allow to make it simple.

Let, the market size before shrinking was 1,000 and the market shares of A, B, and C were 50, 150, and 800 i.e., 5%, 15%, and 80% respectively.

Now, after shrinking, the market size becomes 100. The market shares of A, B, and C could still be 5%, 15%, and 80% respectively or any variations. So, market or market size is not correlated with market share.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 506
Own Kudos [?]: 640 [0]
Given Kudos: 61
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
A seems best : In many European countries, satisfactory taste and low-fat content are believed to be entirely contradictory.
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 506
Own Kudos [?]: 640 [0]
Given Kudos: 61
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
Quote:
Just to add a subtle but important difference everyone is missing..B is all about the market and our argument is revolving around market share..so B is out :-D :-D


is it some kind of a explanation that u have written because this is not the reason as why B stands out .the fact is B is presenting two opposing views .the argument is about "low fat butter" .now B talks about the shrinking market of both "butter" (normal butter) and "margarine"(a kind of low fat butter) . u cannot make out from B as which market is effectively gaining or loosing !!
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 506
Own Kudos [?]: 640 [0]
Given Kudos: 61
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
when the arguments talk about :"it found that it was unable to achieve any appreciable market share." then it means the market of "butter" ,which in turn comprise of market of "low fat butter" and market of "high fat butter" .
now if u look B : The market for yellow fats such as margarine and butter has been slowly shrinking in many European countries due to the emergence of specialized cheese spreads.---->when u say that "market" is shrinking then effectively u mean that its representation in percentage in decreasing .

think it like this .had B been this : market of low fat butter is shrinking because of some XYZ reason ....then it wud have been a contender .--->because let say that initially market of "low fat butter" and market of "high fat butter" was balanced at 50 /50 and now it has become 25 /75 then the argument to increase the market share of "low fat butter" wud still be considered out of 100 and not 25 !!
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 May 2014
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 40 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
aditya8062 wrote:
when the arguments talk about :"it found that it was unable to achieve any appreciable market share." then it means the market of "butter" ,which in turn comprise of market of "low fat butter" and market of "high fat butter" .
now if u look B : The market for yellow fats such as margarine and butter has been slowly shrinking in many European countries due to the emergence of specialized cheese spreads.---->when u say that "market" is shrinking then effectively u mean that its representation in percentage in decreasing .

think it like this .had B been this : market of low fat butter is shrinking because of some XYZ reason ....then it wud have been a contender .--->because let say that initially market of "low fat butter" and market of "high fat butter" was balanced at 50 /50 and now it has become 25 /75 then the argument to increase the market share of "low fat butter" wud still be considered out of 100 and not 25 !!


In my opinion, when we say the 'market is shrinking,' we mean that in absolute terms. If the market for butter were 1000 Kg and that for margarine were 500 Kg, now they might be down to 800 Kg and 400 kg respectively. This fact doesn't provide any information about market share of company K's product.

Even if the markets were growing in size, we can't conclude anything about the market share of a particular product. The market size, or its growth or decline is irrelevant here. The correct option statement should talk about why company K's product didn't gain market share. A does that perfectly by informing us that compnay K's product is considered low on taste. Hence, A is the right choice.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
mikemcgarry
carcass
No where in passage we are told about satisfactory taste.
The taste may be worst also.How can the option A stand then , because it will stand only when taste is satisfactory and butter is low in fats.
Am i missing something??
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 70 [0]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
prashantpareek wrote:
Quote:
Just to add a subtle but important difference everyone is missing..B is all about the market and our argument is revolving around market share..so B is out :-D :-D


This is the correct explanation for ruling out B. The information regarding whether the market is expanding or shrinking doesn't help us in determining why company K's product isn't gaining market share. So it doesn't cast a doubt on the effectiveness of the new solution.


Couldn't you use that same logic to rule out A? "(A) In many European countries, satisfactory taste and low-fat content are believed to be entirely contradictory." How do we know satisfactory taste and low-fat content are directly related to people NOT purchasing "low-fat butter substitute into European markets"? The truth is the stimulus does not give us this connection. It is entirely possible that the market for low-fat butter substitutes in European markets are aware of the contradiction but still purchase the product anyway.

This would mean that doubt is NOT cast on the solution.

Can anyone explain how this logic is incorrect?
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2013
Posts: 74
Own Kudos [?]: 1069 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
I still dont think the A is the right choice. Anywhere in the passage, the author does not mention anything related to consumer preferences, taste in particular. Yet, in choice B, there is a real alternative that consumers have began drifting to...
The company will focus on being an alternative, but there is already one. So, i think the choice b is the most doubting argument for the plan.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 170 [0]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
samichange wrote:
alphaseeker wrote:
I still dont think the A is the right choice. Anywhere in the passage, the author does not mention anything related to consumer preferences, taste in particular. Yet, in choice B, there is a real alternative that consumers have began drifting to...
The company will focus on being an alternative, but there is already one. So, i think the choice b is the most doubting argument for the plan.



B says that the market for alternatives to butter is increasing. This supports the strategy of the company because the company re-launched its low fat butter under the garb of the low -fat alternative to butter.

Whereas A highlights the fact , that it may be the taste and not the low-fat thing that is responsible for the failure of the initial launch.

We have to create a doubt on the success of the plan and A does create doubt .

Hope the above helps!!


I donot mind Kudos..



Lets say Market itself is declining for product A, now whatever you do if there is no potential customer obviously sales are low for your product and that lead to decline in Market share as Market is already saturated. Although this option is not full-proofed, Option A also doesn't stand the heat. Everybody knows that Low fat and taste are contradictory and weight conscious people prefer low fat even though it doesn't provide satisfaction.

If in the entire prompts, it was mentioned that European prefer satisfaction over low fat, we can conclude that A weakens the most otherwise not.

Pathetic question.
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2164 [0]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
Just because the marketing is shrinking doesn't mean a company can't attain appreciable market share. The market might be worth trillions.

E sorta says that the rebranding in isolation was effective, so a marketing campaign on top would assumedly be more effective. Strengthens.

A is the only real weakener as irrespective of any marketing/ rebranding, the product will still be perceived by consumers in the same light.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Send PM
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
WoundedTiger wrote:
JusTLucK04 wrote:
After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into European markets for the first time, it found that it was unable to achieve any appreciable market share. To combat this problem, Company K re-released the product under a new name with great fanfare and a substantial marketing budget, calling it the“new low-fat alternative to butter.”
Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the effectiveness of the solution proposed above?
(A) In many European countries, satisfactory taste and low-fat content are believed to be entirely contradictory.
(B) The market for yellow fats such as margarine and butter has been slowly shrinking in many European countries due to the emergence of specialized cheese spreads.
(C) Company K could only feasibly maintain such a marketing budget for 10 to 12 months before scaling down the campaign.
(D) After Company K attempted a similar marketing strategy in South America, sales of the new product greatly increased.
(E) In Denmark, the new low-fat butter substitute achieved a market share of 15% within the first year – without any massive marketing campaign.

Kudos for the question


Situation: Company K introduced Low fat butter but failed to gain appreciable market share and went back renamed it is the new low fat butter with the intention of winning the market share.

We need to find a weakner which will question the proposed solution

Option C is irrelevant here.
Option D if any gives strengthens the proposal
In option E, points to a one of the markets where the product did well and if any agains strengthens the proposal

We are left with option A and B
Option B gives us an information which if true will weaken the solution proposed off. Having said that we need to find the information which will cast MOST DOUBT. A does that best

Ans is A


I agree with you that option A cast Most Doubt; However, is there any hint in the question saying that europeans buy the products based on satisfaction? If not how can we conclude that the europeans buy the products based on satisfaction they may be buying them for fitness or other purposes.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: After Company K released its low-fat butter substitute into [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne