It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 02:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# All of the accompanying conclusions are based on accurate

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: 55405
All of the accompanying conclusions are based on accurate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 10:35
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:00) correct 50% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

All of the accompanying conclusions are based on accurate expense vouchers summitted by employees to department head of a certain corporation in 1995.

Which of them is LEAST likely to be weakened by the discovery of additional 1995 expense vouchers?

A. The accounting department had only 15 employees and claimed expenses of at least \$500.
B. The sales department had at least 25 employees and claimed expenses of at least \$35.000
C. The legal department had at least 2 employees and claimed no more than \$3,000 in expenses.
D. The public relationship department had no more then 1 employee and claimed no more than \$200 in expenses.
E. The production department had no fewer than 500 employees and claimed no more than \$350 in expenses.

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Location: MI

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 15:40
What kind of a question is this ???

I go with C...will try to explain if I am correct..which I doubt..

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: 55405

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 15:55
ARCO, I guess-- swiped it from elsewhere on the net.

This too is a pretty easy question, IMO. Try it again.

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 16:02
B. If they claim a minimum expense and a minimum # of employees, then the discovery of new expenses will be justifiable because only minimums were stated.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Location: MI

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 17:12
Paul wrote:
B. If they claim a minimum expense and a minimum # of employees, then the discovery of new expenses will be justifiable because only minimums were stated.

But how can you be sure that the newly discovered vouchers don't change the lower limits ????
What if 50 more were discovered which had claims of only \$20.00 ???

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 17:26
The point is that it is the one which is LEAST likely to be weakened if new expenses are to be discovered because of the reasons I previously mentioned. In C however, if the expenses were AT MOST 3000\$, then how can they justify an increase in expenses? IMO, it will be more difficult as B to justify such increases in expenses. However, I may also be wrong...
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 17:27
My bet is on B.
Atleast 25 employees are there and they claimed atleast some amount. So few more vouchers can account for few more employees and the amount can account for some more than \$35,000

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: 55405

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 18:14
B, indeed. Nice work, fellas.

And, Paul, don't be a stranger.

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 18:16
What a question. I am still wiping sweat on my forehead.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2004, 18:23
I'm back baby! Good to see you again guys.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: All of the accompanying conclusions are based on accurate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 05:33
My choice is option B. Very interesting question.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: All of the accompanying conclusions are based on accurate   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 05:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by