Nightmare007 wrote:
How can you suppose that they are running in full capacity. Previously they ran on normal capacity.
C tells that they did not increase sales from these opened.
Suppose MD owns 10 distribution centers each used to sell 10Million packets of milk. 4 - closed down.
C is saying these 6 distribution centers did not sell more packets to compensate for the 40 million packets sales difference.So i opted C.
E says: what if its business is outside than inside. - Still it lost 4 outlets, and it will not affect anything. I think this is irrelevant. So what if people buy from outside city. We don't know whether each of the distributors will sell more this time in outside or will sell less outside.
abhimahna,
GMATNinja Can you please tell me where am going wrong. Am still not sure why E is right. I have given my reasoning in above statements.
Thank you
Hey
Nightmare007 ,
I understood what made you go wrong.
Option C is saying the remaining centers sold less volume. Now, this could be a strengthener but not an assumption. So, if you negate this statement: "They didn't sell less volume". This means they are selling either equal or more. If more, our conclusion is broken apart but if equal, it strengthens the conclusion.
Now, let's talk about option E.
E is saying they are not getting most of their business from outside. Notice the word "MOST". If I say, yes they have most of their business from outside, that means closing of those 4 centers in the state won't impact much and hence the conclusion is broken.
But if they are getting everything from within the state, they will surely have a great impact. Hence, E is the correct answer.
Remember: An assumption is something if negated breaks the conclusion apart.
Does that make sense?
If we negate C there will be either equal amounts or more. If equal then the conclusion still hold. If more, we still don't know if enough to compensate. So C is out.
If we negate E and assume that more than half of the distribution centers are outside of HC we would still need to assume that they made enough to compensate for the closed centers. Because even if the ones that closed were negligible and most of the DCs remained open technically the revenues would be less.
I eventually chose E because it was the only option left and not because I was convinced by the content.
Can you please make it clearer. Maybe i am missing something or using a wrong approach.