int202
I'm in the process of building an alternative transcript for certain business/economics classes I did poorly on in undergrad, using UCLA extension courses (Business Statistics, Business Valuation, Financial Statement Analysis). However, I'm wondering if it may be more worthwhile to take other courses (like Intro to Accounting and Microeconomics) as I've heard that some schools ask specifically whether you've taken certain courses and what grade was received. Which classes (if any) are required to be reported as part of an MBA application?
I'm talking specifically about individual course grades, not the entire transcript. If this isn't a common practice, I'd feel more comfortable about taking UCLAx classes like Business Valuation that don't necessarily line up 1-to-1 with courses they would ask grades for, like Corporate Finance.
If it means anything, I also passed CFA level 1, so it may be redundant to take certain classes again for an alternative transcript if adcoms view that as its own measure of competency.
Thanks.
Hello
int202You have picked good choices on your own, such as Business Statistics, Business Valuation etc.
There is no such thing as one common frame of background that serves as standard prerequisite for MBA, since people are coming from various backgrounds.
It is good idea to take classes where you did poorly in business/economics classes and I will assume that is actually your undergraduate background, which is fine really.
If you already didn't took CF or similar, you will have it on MBA, again CF is not prerequisite, so take additional classes in area that pique your interest, for instance in Valuation as you mentioned.
Anything in Math/Stat is good prep for MBA, also your GMAT will prove them you can perform on necessary graduate level.
You can contact your top 5 schools on list to ask them, do they recommend/advise taking any particular additional courses based on your undergraduate background and GPA.
That will be your best guidance, if necessary.
Good Luck