Last visit was: 04 Sep 2026, 20:23 It is currently 04 Sep 2026, 20:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
53,630
 [7]
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,630
 [7]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Aham56
Joined: 07 Oct 2021
Last visit: 13 Mar 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
39
 [3]
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 18
Kudos: 39
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Aham56
Joined: 07 Oct 2021
Last visit: 13 Mar 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 18
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Aham56
Joined: 07 Oct 2021
Last visit: 13 Mar 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
39
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 18
Kudos: 39
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
4. According to the passage, the Chinese were reluctant to trade with the Portuguese because

(A) their attempts to make official contact with the Ming court were thought to be insincere
(B) the climate e¤ects of the Little Ice Age limited the goods they could o¤er in trade
(C) the visitors were rumored to be abducting Chinese children
(D) bad experiences from coastal raids conducted by the Japanese a¤ected their views of all non-Chinese
This is supported in the passage which states that ‘Given the contemporary Chinese experience of Japanese piracy in coastal areas, it is no surprise that authorities were skeptical of foreigners’ which would include the Portugueses.

(E) the Chinese traditionally avoided contact with outsiders, and the strong economy in the early Ming years provided no incentive to do otherwise
avatar
Aham56
Joined: 07 Oct 2021
Last visit: 13 Mar 2023
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 18
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
5. Which of the following, if true, would seriously undermine the conclusion that in‡ation in silver values contributed to economic disaster for rural Chinese?

The passage states that the ‘Little Ice Age’ and silver inflation affected the economy of rural Chinese. We need to find a conclusion which supports that silver inflation did not affect the economics of rural Chinese. This is a critical reasoning question.

(A) The rural economy rebounded relatively soon after the Manchus conquered China.
Could have been for any number of reasons. We cannot tie this to silver values.
(B) The environmental effects of the Little Ice Age meant that the supply of necessities, such as food, was extremely scarce at any price.
This is given and does not attack the silver premise
(C) Most rural Chinese in the Ming era did not use hard currency, instead operating a highly advanced barter economy.
If this were true and they used advanced barter instead of hard currency silver, this undermines the conclusion that silver price changes affected the rural Chinese
(D) The famine brought about by the Little Ice Age caused many rural Chinese to relocate to urban areas.
Same as choice B, does not affect the silver premise.

(E) Economic problems in Europe at this time were completely unrelated to the price or availability of silver.
It is the religious wars in Europe rather than the economic problems in Europe that caused trade in silver to be affected.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

3. The passage is primarily concerned with

Explanation

In scope questions, start by looking at the initial verbs. The author is not arguing a side in this passage, so “arguing” is wrong. Even “suggesting” and “emphasizing” indicate more of a position from the author’s perspective; I wouldn’t completely rule those out, but I would focus instead on the two choices that open with “explaining.”

Choice (B) is far too broad, and is only addressed by one sentence in the second paragraph. (D) is much better, and includes descriptions of content in both paragraphs. Note that (D) has much of the same description as (A), but the initial verb makes the di¤erence. To confirm that the others are incorrect: (C) is wrong because of the word “only,” and (E) is much too broad, while the passage focuses on only one dynasty. Choice (D) is correct.

Answer: D
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation
­

1. With which of the following generalization regarding the Ming Dynasty would the author most probably agree?

Explanation

This is an inference question that could refer to nearly any part of the passage. Since there is no way to narrow down what the passage said about the Ming Dynasty, look at each answer choice.

Choice (A) is incorrect. The first sentence of the paragraph tells us that the Ming was more open than previous dynasties, but we don’t know how it compared to those that followed.

(B) is not only correct, it sums up much of the main point of the passage. The trade brought in silver, and when the silver dried up, it caused economic problems.

Choice (C) is wrong, as all we know is that the Ming suffered from Japanese piracy, and Japanese silver was brokered through a third party.

(D) is impossible to tell; if anything, the Protestant raids hurt the Ming.

(E) could be true, but the passage only gives us one instance of treatment of foreigners, so we can’t draw a generalization.

Choice (B) is correct.
 
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

­2. The passage suggests that Ming-Japanese interaction different from Ming-Portuguese interaction in that

Explanation

The passage doesn’t tell us much about Ming-Japanese relations, other than that the Ming su¤ered “Japanese piracy in coastal areas,” and that other countries brokered silver between Japan and the Ming. Recognizing that limitation, we can eliminate each of the …rst four choices. We don’t know anything about the welcome granted the Japanese, whether they brokered goods from other sources, whether they were jailed, or whether they limited themselves to luxury goods. We do, however, know that they were considered illegal (that’s what piracy is), and the characterization of Portuguese trade in (E) is accurate as well.

Answer: E
­
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

­4. According to the passage, the Chinese were reluctant to trade with the Portuguese because

Explanation

The phrase “according to the passage” signals that this is a detail question. The correct answer should closely reflect some part of the passage. The Chinese reluctance is detailed in the first paragraph, including this: “Given the contemporary Chinese experience of Japanese piracy in coastal areas, it is no surprise that authorities were skeptical of foreigners. . . ” That’s (D), which is correct.

Answer: D
 
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,630
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

­ 5. Which of the following, if true, would seriously undermine the conclusion that in‡ation in silver values contributed to economic disaster for rural Chinese?

Explanation

This is a rare occurrence in a Reading Comprehension passage: a weaken question. It isolates which conclusion we’re to focus on, so we know we want a choice that explains why the inflation in silver values would not contribute to disaster for rural Chinese.

Choice (A) is incorrect, as it explains what happens after the disaster.

(B) doesn’t explain why silver wasn’t important; if anything, it sounds as if currency would’ve been very helpful.

(C) weakens the conclusion as, if rural Chinese didn’t use hard currency (such as silver), the change in silver values would not have affected them.

Choice (D) is irrelevant, as it doesn’t even tangentially address silver.

(E) is also irrelevant: the question is about rural Chinese, not people anywhere else in the world. Choice (C) is correct.

Answer: C 
­­
User avatar
gaba619
Joined: 18 Jan 2026
Last visit: 28 Jul 2026
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
in 4th question , abducting the children was also given as a reason to not allow foreigners on Chinese soil so why it aint the answer?
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,827
Own Kudos:
14,370
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,827
Kudos: 14,370
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
4. According to the passage, the Chinese were reluctant to trade with the Portuguese because

The passage says the Chinese-Portuguese relationship was difficult for decades. The main reason given is that Chinese authorities were already suspicious of foreigners because of Japanese piracy along the coast. So the Portuguese were viewed through that existing suspicion of outsiders.

(A) their attempts to make official contact with the Ming court were thought to be insincere

This is not stated. The passage says the Portuguese made elaborate formal efforts to open trade, not that the Chinese thought those efforts were fake.

(B) the climate effects of the Little Ice Age limited the goods they could offer in trade

This is incorrect. The Little Ice Age is mentioned later as a factor in economic disaster, not as a reason China was reluctant to trade with the Portuguese.

(C) the visitors were rumored to be abducting Chinese children

This is tempting, but too narrow. The passage mentions this rumor, but the broader explanation for Chinese reluctance is their existing suspicion of foreigners because of Japanese coastal piracy.

(D) bad experiences from coastal raids conducted by the Japanese affected their views of all non-Chinese

This is correct. The passage says that, given the Chinese experience of Japanese piracy in coastal areas, it is not surprising that Chinese authorities were skeptical of foreigners.

(E) the Chinese traditionally avoided contact with outsiders, and the strong economy in the early Ming years provided no incentive to do otherwise

This is incorrect. The passage says Ming foreign trade reflected unusual openness, not traditional avoidance of outsiders.

Answer: (D)
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,290
Kudos: 33,900
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi gaba619,

You're right that the child-kidnapping rumor is in the passage, so it feels like a fair pick. The trick is what role that sentence plays. Let's read the exact lines.

Paragraph 1 gives you a list of things that made the relationship "fractious":

"...died in a Chinese jail; the antics of the Portuguese ambassador's brother fed rumors that the Portuguese were kidnapping and eating Chinese children."

Notice the framing: these are incidents that describe how bad the relationship was - anecdotes, not the cause the author points to. Then comes the sentence that actually explains why the Chinese were wary:

"Given the contemporary Chinese experience of Japanese piracy in coastal areas, it is no surprise that authorities were skeptical of foreigners..."

That "Given... it is no surprise" is the author telling you the reason for the reluctance - bad experiences with the Japanese coloring their view of all foreigners. That's exactly choice D.

So the split is:

(C) - a rumor the passage mentions as one symptom of the tense relationship.

(D) - the underlying cause the passage explicitly gives for the reluctance.

Since the stem says "reluctant to trade... because," you want the stated cause, not an example of the friction.

A quick way to feel the difference:

"The dinner was a disaster: the soup was cold and a guest spilled wine. Because the host had never cooked before, no one expected much."

If asked why the dinner went badly, the answer is "the host had never cooked" - not "a guest spilled wine." The spill is an incident; the inexperience is the reason. Same structure here: the child rumor is the "spilled wine," the Japanese piracy is "never cooked before."

That's why D is correct.

Answer: D

gaba619
Sajjad1994
in 4th question , abducting the children was also given as a reason to not allow foreigners on Chinese soil so why it aint the answer?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
46 posts