Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 01:56 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 01:56

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Status:Do and Die!!
Posts: 207
Own Kudos [?]: 2135 [4]
Given Kudos: 193
 Q29  V6 GMAT 3: 430  Q31  V19
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2014
Status:PLAY HARD OR GO HOME
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 624 [7]
Given Kudos: 622
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Mannheim
GMAT 1: 560 Q46 V22
GPA: 3.1
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 75
Own Kudos [?]: 3178 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Status:Three Down.
Posts: 1764
Own Kudos [?]: 3468 [3]
Given Kudos: 210
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
Send PM
Re: US goverment [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Conclusion: The international aid programs help the destitute people.

shrive555 wrote:
Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests dictate policy in the United States government’s international aid programs, and that such aid is used to support right-wing dictatorships, it is nevertheless true that these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the argument above?

A: The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards. This is correct, since it directly weakens the conclusion. If the foreign aid in these countries get controlled by the officials who use them for political rewards, then the aid isn't really going to the destitute people it was meant to help.

B: Literacy textbooks prepared under the direction of the United States Central Intelligence Agency include lessons on the disadvantages of communism. Does this have ANYTHING to do with what's asked? No. Incorrect.

C: Most of the food used in these programs is from crops purchased by the American government from American farmers through subsidy programs designed to improve the American economy. Where the crop comes from is immaterial. We are told that the aid helps the destitute people. Can you say, that just because the crops

D: In countries that do not receive aid from the United States, thousands die each year from starvation and disease. We are not concerned about countries that don't receive aid. Irrelevant.

E: Governments classified as right wing receive over 78 percent of the total U.S. expenditures for international development programs; governments classified as socialist receive less than 12 percent.Aagain, out of scope and irrelevant
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Status:ISB, Hyderabad
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 95 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: Strategy
 Q50  V35 GMAT 2: 740  Q50  V40
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Send PM
Re: US goverment [#permalink]
Straight A. I think thats the only option that makes sense.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 May 2010
Status:it won't happen in one day but it'll happen one day
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: US goverment [#permalink]
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the argument above?


hmmm.......its clearly A
it states...these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people...but what if those who control the distribution use them for political and personal gains and it never reaches the needy.It would take the wind out of the argument.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 137
Own Kudos [?]: 464 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: US goverment [#permalink]
1
Kudos
This is a weaken question

find the conclusion and then the choice that weakens the conclusion

conclusion:-
it is nevertheless true that these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people

A -The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards. directly weakens this conclusions . if the distribution is controlled by officials who use them for personal rewards then this may not be helping innocent people

rest all choices does not weaken the conclusion .
Ans:A
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 343 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: US goverment [#permalink]
A: The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards. ==> Correct.

B: Literacy textbooks prepared under the direction of the United States Central Intelligence Agency include lessons on the disadvantages of communism. ==> No effect

C: Most of the food used in these programs is from crops purchased by the American government from American farmers through subsidy programs designed to improve the American economy. ==> Strengthen. Whatever be it, US govt programs bring much-needed food.
D: In countries that do not receive aid from the United States, thousands die each year from starvation and disease. ==> Strengthen

E: Governments classified as right wing receive over 78 percent of the total U.S. expenditures for international development programs; governments classified as socialist receive less than 12 percent. ==> No effect
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: United States (KS)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.95
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
Re: US goverment [#permalink]
A seems correct per your descriptions.

E seems to actual strengthen arguement (does not seem out-of-scope or irrelevant, but supportive of argument)
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: US goverment [#permalink]
Pretty straight forward.. A..
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 May 2014
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: United States
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink]
I have a stupid question.

The question asks to weaken the argument and not the conclusion. The argument wouldn´t be that this policy is selfish and helps only dictators?

Should I always go straight to weaken the conclusion in this kind of question, no matter if the question refers to conclusion or argument?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 429
Own Kudos [?]: 263 [0]
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink]
Luizonho wrote:
I have a stupid question.

The question asks to weaken the argument and not the conclusion. The argument wouldn´t be that this policy is selfish and helps only dictators?

Should I always go straight to weaken the conclusion in this kind of question, no matter if the question refers to conclusion or argument?




Conclusion is a part of argument, moreover, there is no argument without conclusion. You are right, when you see such questions, go directly conclusion this is what answer choices should weaken or strengthen
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [1]
Given Kudos: 110
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q39 V28
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests d [#permalink]
1
Kudos
From the argument, we can come to conclusion that whatever may the motive be, in the end, the program is helping needy people. Any answer that proves that these people are not getting benefited despite the aid is the right answer. Only A stand in this case. If food and medicines distributed to needy nations are not reaching the people, instead, government officials of that country are using the given aid for its own interest, then conclusion isn't true.

- A
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests d [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
This isn't really an argument in the GMAT sense. It starts with a counterpremise that it accepts, and then it draws a conclusion that has no premise to support it. Answer choice A weakens in that it contradicts the conclusion, but you're not likely to see anything like that on the test. Also, most of the wrong answer choices are too wildly out of scope to be tempting. You're much better off studying from the Official Guide!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests d [#permalink]
DmitryFarber wrote:
This isn't really an argument in the GMAT sense. It starts with a counterpremise that it accepts, and then it draws a conclusion that has no premise to support it. Answer choice A weakens in that it contradicts the conclusion, but you're not likely to see anything like that on the test. Also, most of the wrong answer choices are too wildly out of scope to be tempting. You're much better off studying from the Official Guide!


Dmitry, Please confirm my understanding.
from what i can see, i can find this as the conclusion.

"selfish interests drive these policies".

if we can weaken this fact by logically saying that "selfish interests DO NOT drive these policies", i think that can be a weakener. A seemed a little to wayward for me; PERSONAL REWARDS?? That clearly created some ambiguity.

For me, I think C can be an answer. I was a little skeptical about the content of the argument as well. Your help would be appreciated..
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [0]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests d [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The problem with identifying the conclusion as "selfish interests drive these policies" is that this point runs counter to everything else the author says.

Imagine that I said "Product X is poorly made, but it has a number of useful features and is more affordable than most competing products." What is my conclusion? I start out criticizing Product X, and then I point out some good things about it. If anything, it seems that I am on the way to recommending Product X, at least in a limited fashion. However, I never do come to a conclusion, so this is not an argument.

The original "argument" is the same. It seems that the author is moving toward an endorsement of US aid programs, but no such endorsement actually occurs. In real life, we might simply guess at the author's intent, but we will never have to do that on the GMAT, As for the initial statement about selfish purposes, there is no support whatsoever for that statement. On the GMAT, an unsupported statement is always a premise (or counterpremise)--it will never be the conclusion.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [0]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink]
shrive555 wrote:
Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests dictate policy in the United States government’s international aid programs, and that such aid is used to support right-wing dictatorships, it is nevertheless true that these programs bring much-needed food and other life giving commodities to destitute, innocent people

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the argument above?

A: The distribution of food and medicines in these foreign countries is always controlled by government officials, who invariably use them for political and personal rewards.

B: Literacy textbooks prepared under the direction of the United States Central Intelligence Agency include lessons on the disadvantages of communism.

C: Most of the food used in these programs is from crops purchased by the American government from American farmers through subsidy programs designed to improve the American economy.

D: In countries that do not receive aid from the United States, thousands die each year from starvation and disease.

E: Governments classified as right wing receive over 78 percent of the total U.S. expenditures for international development programs; governments classified as socialist receive less than 12 percent.


the argument is in favor of aid programs for the countries in which right-wing dictatorships are present.
to weaken the argument, we can say that the benefits are not distributed accordingly, and dictators use these sources to increase their popularity, and thus maintain the power.
A exactly says this.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 76
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 223
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests d [#permalink]
I mark C as an answer, which is irrelevant as B,D and E.
we need to mark a weakener for this question, and only weakener, we can suggest from above choices is ANSWER-A
Two conclusion-
USA gives these aid for their benefits --->(ring wings)--> but govt officials use this aid for their benefit (weakener).
Helps in removal of poverty-->govt officials use this aid for their benefit (weakener).
Retired Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink]
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17227
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne