Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Originally posted by quiet888 on 04 May 2008, 17:41.
Last edited by quiet888 on 10 May 2008, 03:31, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
a0%
b0%
c0%
d0%
e0%
A
B
C
D
E
Hide
Show
History
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 2
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Among lower- paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower - end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend B) imposing stricter limits on medical services , requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
B,D,E 'see' is not parallel to 'spending'. (to see more patients, and (to) spend less ..) C 'that' is missing before 'require' to make it parallel with 'that impose'. A wins. plans imposing X and (plans) requiring A to (b and c).
C and E are giving sense that plans are spending time with each patients which is not the case .D seems correct but the last and is dubious .If and is not there ,In D participle phrase after comma is correctly modifying doctors.
B,D,E 'see' is not parallel to 'spending'. (to see more patients, and (to) spend less ..) C 'that' is missing before 'require' to make it parallel with 'that impose'. A wins. plans imposing X and (plans) requiring A to (b and c).
Show more
I see it a little different.
low-end insurance plans.. B) imposing stricter limits on medical services , requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
Imposing, requiring, and spending. It's low-end insurance plans that were concerned with not the doctors.
A for me B) should end with "doctors to see AND spend" C) typical run-on sentence problem whereby dependent clause beginning with "require" should be linked with a conjunction D) would have been good if "spending" was parallel with the rest. Basically, "and" as conjunction is linking a dependent clause with a phrase (ie spending less time with each) and is a syntax breach. E) same problem as B) for "spending" verb
B,D,E 'see' is not parallel to 'spending'. (to see more patients, and (to) spend less ..) C 'that' is missing before 'require' to make it parallel with 'that impose'. A wins. plans imposing X and (plans) requiring A to (b and c).
I see it a little different.
low-end insurance plans.. B) imposing stricter limits on medical services , requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
Imposing, requiring, and spending. It's low-end insurance plans that were concerned with not the doctors.
Show more
so you are saying plans imposing,plans requiring, and plans spending.. Can you expln to what does 'each' refering to?
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.