zoezhuyan
I am still confused
the passage says, forging a multilateral trade policy consensus among so many diverse economic systems has become virtually impossible. and the author also says But both sides base their positions on the same two OUTDATED premises.
that's what I understand "incompatible with CURRENT " Arborian foreign trade policy. that's why picked up E.
I didn't quote your entire post. So, for future readers I'll say here that it's about question 495.
Here's (E) from question 495.
E. The principles of multilateral trade negotiations are incompatible with current Arborian foreign trade policy.Notice that you went from "outdated" in the passage to "incompatible with current Arborian foreign trade policy" in choice (E).
"Outdated" is a general term. "Incompatible with current Arborian foreign trade policy" is a specific issue.
Does the passage say that multilateral trade negotiations are "outdated" that specific way?
No, it does not. Rather, it says that they are outdated because "Forging a multilateral trade policy consensus among so many diverse economic systems has become virtually impossible."
So, the issue is not that multilateral trade negotiations are "incompatible with current Arborian foreign trade policy." It's that they are incompatible with the current situation worldwide.
Quote:
I am not sure where the passage says Arborian reliance on multilateral trade negotiations, the passage says And while multilateral talks drag on, Arboria misses opportunities for trade expansion. I think Arborian keeps on multilateral talks, leading it loss the opportunities, but it does not mean it relies on multilateral read negotiation. that's way I crossed off D.
Here's (D).
D. Arborian reliance on multilateral trade negotiations, while appropriate in the past, is inadequate for today's global marketplace.Now, here's the thing. That passage doesn't have to support (D) directly. Notice that the question asked is the following?
It can be inferred that the author of the passage would most likely agree with which of the following statements about multilateral trade negotiations?So, we just need information from the passage that indicates that "the author of the passage would most likely agree with" (D).
Here's what the passage says.
First it says that people Arboria "base their positions" on the outdated premise that "Multilateral negotiations are the most effective way to resolve pressing trade issues."
Then, it says that "World trade is no longer dominated by the free-trade economies; nearly 75 percent is conducted by economic systems operating with principles at odds with those of Arboria. Forging a multilateral trade policy consensus among so many diverse economic systems has become virtually impossible."
Given that the author has made those statements, it follows that the author would believe what (D) says, that in "today's global marketplace," other other words one in which there are many "economic systems operating with principles at odds with those of Arboria, and in which "Forging a multilateral trade policy consensus among so many diverse economic systems has become virtually impossible," "Arborian reliance on multilateral trade negotiations, while appropriate in the past, is inadequate."