Last visit was: 12 May 2026, 07:57 It is currently 12 May 2026, 07:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
theprof
Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sdrandom1
Joined: 30 May 2009
Last visit: 30 Nov 2009
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Posts: 89
Kudos: 775
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
theprof
Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Last visit: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATaddict
Joined: 15 May 2009
Last visit: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 90
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
theprof
Hi all. I'm using a testprep book from Petersons. In it, the following question came up

Which of the following conclusions can be deduced from the two statements below?

Some Alphas are not Gammas
All Betas are Gammas

A) Some Alphas are not Betas
B) No Gammas are Alphas
C) All Gammas are Betas
D) All Alphas are Gammas
E) Some Alphas are Gammas

Are these logic based questions tested on the GMAT? I've only seen them in this book so far.

I think I would go with (A), it is the only sure conclusion we could make.

B - Can't conclude this, original info leaves open the possibility that some A is also G.
C - No, reversed logic.
D - This is the logical opposite of the original info, & is therefore incorrect.
E - This is an attractive answer, but we can't conclude this one way or another. Maybe some A is G, but no A fits into the sub-category B.
User avatar
GMATaddict
Joined: 15 May 2009
Last visit: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 90
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATaddict
theprof
Hi all. I'm using a testprep book from Petersons. In it, the following question came up

Which of the following conclusions can be deduced from the two statements below?

Some Alphas are not Gammas
All Betas are Gammas

A) Some Alphas are not Betas
B) No Gammas are Alphas
C) All Gammas are Betas
D) All Alphas are Gammas
E) Some Alphas are Gammas

Are these logic based questions tested on the GMAT? I've only seen them in this book so far.

I think I would go with (A), it is the only sure conclusion we could make.

B - Can't conclude this, original info leaves open the possibility that some A is also G.
C - No, reversed logic.
D - This is the logical opposite of the original info, & is therefore incorrect.
E - This is an attractive answer, but we can't conclude this one way or another. Maybe some A is G, but no A fits into the sub-category B.

I think another logic flaw of choice E is that it excludes the possibility that 'ALL alphas are NOT gammas'. IF ALL alphas are NOT gammas, then it is also true that SOME alphas are not gammas; these two possibilities are not mutually exclusive.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
562 posts
363 posts