ExplanationAutomobile-emission standards are enforced through annual inspection. At those inspections, cars are tested while idling; that is, standing still with their engines running. Testing devices measure the levels of various pollutants as exhaust gases leave the tail pipe.
Which one of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that current enforcement of automobile-emission standards might be ineffective in controlling overall pollutant levels?This question is a plan question.
In this case, the plan is to use testing devices to measure the levels of various pollutants as exhaust gases leave the tail pipe of a car that is idling.
The purpose of the plan is found in the question stem: "controlling overall pollutant levels."
The correct answer will indicate that the plan "might not be effective" in achieving that purpose. So, this question is basically a Weaken question with the implied conclusion that the plan will be effective in controlling overall pollutant levels.
(A) As an emission-control technology approaches its limits, any additional gains in effectiveness become progressively more expensive.There are two issues with this choice.
One is that we have no reason to believe that the emission-control technology currently in use is approaching its limits. So, we'd have to make an unsupported leap to the idea that the emission-control technology currently in use is approaching its limits for this choice to be relevant.
More importantly, this choice comes at the situation from the wrong direction. After all, even if gains in effectiveness of emissions-control technology become more expensive, testing automobiles in the way described by the plan could result in enforcement of emissions standards, which could result in controlling of overall pollutant levels. In other words, controlling pollutant levels might be expensive, but it could still work.
Eliminate.
(B) The testing devices used must be recalibrated frequently to measure pollutant levels with acceptable accuracy.This choice has a vibe of weakening the argument because it mentions something that may seem to make it difficult for the plan to work, need for frequent recalibration of devices.
However, the truth is that what this choice mentions is just a normal part of the testing process. The fact that the process involves recalibrating devices doesn't at all indicate that it isn't effective.
Eliminate.
(C) The adjustments needed to make a car idle cleanly make it likely that the car will emit high levels of pollutants when moving at highway speeds.To see that this choice indicates that the plan won't be effective in controlling pollutant levels, we need to notice a key detail of passage, which is that it says that, in the plan, "cars are tested while idling."
Since cars are tested while idling, this choice indicates that the plan may not work since, even though the tested cars emit low levels of pollutants, they will likely emit high levels of pollutants while operating on highways. So, the testing process described may not result in effective control of pollutant levels.
Keep.
(D) Most car owners ask their mechanics to make sure that their cars are in compliance with emission standards.If anything, this choice strengthens rather than weakens the case for the believing that the plan will work since it appears that enforcement of emissions standards leads to car owners ensuring that their cars are in compliance with the standards.
Eliminate.
(E) When emission standards are set, no allowances are made for older cars.If anything, this choice strengthens rather than weakens the case for the believing that the plan will work since it indicates that even older cars must be in compliance with the standards.
Eliminate.
Correct Answer