Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Aug 2710:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Oct. 13, 2026 - Jan. 7, 2027, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
04 Nov 2014, 09:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dear GMAT club members. I have a very general question on averages (arithmetic means). I worked through a number of OG guide problems as well as Manhattan Word Problem sets that deal with arithmetic averages.
Is my conclusion below correct:
Assume you have two groups of data, say one set of data for males and one set of data for females. If you have the average for the total group, and you are given the average for one group (say males) it is not possible to determine the average of the second group without knowing anything on the numbers in the groups (either be it total numbers or ratios).
For example:
Question 1:
(note this question is one of the problem sets in manhattan gmat guides)
A charitable association sold an average of 66 raffle tickets per member. Among the female members, the average was 70 raffle tickets. The male to female ratio of the association if 1:2. What was the average number of tickets sold by the male members of the association?
If the ratio between males:females were ommitted, it is impossible to deduce the average of the tickets sold by the male group. Is my assumption correct?
Question 2:
(note this question comes out of the OG 2015 edition), I actually found this question extremely complex. But having studied Manhattan guides, I realised that you need both statements together(one dealing with the average of one group, and the other dealing with a certain quantitative indicator for the group) to answer this qestion. Is my reasoning correct?
At a certain company, a test was given to a group of men and women seeking promotions. If the average score for the group was 80, was the average score for the women greater than 85?
1. The average score for the men was less than 75.
2. The group consisted of more men than women
I notice that the GMAT loves playing with this idea on data sufficiency problems so I was just hoping to get some insight from all you bright people on here:-)
Is my conclusion below correct:
Assume you have two groups of data, say one set of data for males and one set of data for females. If you have the average for the total group, and you are given the average for one group (say males) it is not possible to determine the average of the second group without knowing anything on the numbers in the groups (either be it total numbers or ratios).
For example:
Question 1:
(note this question is one of the problem sets in manhattan gmat guides)
A charitable association sold an average of 66 raffle tickets per member. Among the female members, the average was 70 raffle tickets. The male to female ratio of the association if 1:2. What was the average number of tickets sold by the male members of the association?
If the ratio between males:females were ommitted, it is impossible to deduce the average of the tickets sold by the male group. Is my assumption correct?
Question 2:
(note this question comes out of the OG 2015 edition), I actually found this question extremely complex. But having studied Manhattan guides, I realised that you need both statements together(one dealing with the average of one group, and the other dealing with a certain quantitative indicator for the group) to answer this qestion. Is my reasoning correct?
At a certain company, a test was given to a group of men and women seeking promotions. If the average score for the group was 80, was the average score for the women greater than 85?
1. The average score for the men was less than 75.
2. The group consisted of more men than women
I notice that the GMAT loves playing with this idea on data sufficiency problems so I was just hoping to get some insight from all you bright people on here:-)
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
