GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 12 Nov 2018, 20:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Essential GMAT Time-Management Hacks

November 14, 2018

November 14, 2018

07:00 PM PST

08:00 PM PST

Join the webinar and learn time-management tactics that will guarantee you answer all questions, in all sections, on time. Save your spot today! Nov. 14th at 7 PM PST
• ### \$450 Tuition Credit & Official CAT Packs FREE

November 15, 2018

November 15, 2018

10:00 PM MST

11:00 PM MST

EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth \$100 with the 3 Month Pack (\$299)

# AWA ESSAY-Please Review and tell where I can improve

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2016
Posts: 44

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2017, 23:05
"Art and music have long been understood to have therapeutic effects for individuals who suffer from either physical or mental illnesses. However, most doctors rarely recommend to patients some form of art or music therapy. Instead, doctors focus almost all of their attention on costly drug treatments and invasive procedures that carry serious risks and side-effects. By focusing on these expensive procedures rather than low-cost treatments such as art and music therapy, doctors are doing a disservice to their patients and contributing to the rising cost of health care in the United States."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.

RESPONSE

Art and music are indeed extremely valuable to human race. In the argument author has talked about the therapeutic effects of art and music on individuals suffering from either physical or mental illnesses and has concluded that doctors are doing a disservice to their patients and contributing to the rising cost of health care in the United States by giving preference to expensive drugs. Though his claim may have merit, the author presents a poorly reasoned argument ,based on several questionable premises and going solely with the evidence the author offers, we cannot accept his argument as valid.

The primary issue with the authors reasoning lies in his unsubstantial premises. The author simply mentions that art and music have long been understood to have therapeutic effects for individuals suffering from illness. However here he does not provide any statistical proof of his statement. Maybe if author had exemplified his premise with some real patient cases his premise would have held more value. Next premise is the focusing of doctors on costly drug treatments and invasive procedures that carry serious risks and side-effects. Here again author has not given any facts to prove that all costly drugs necessarily have serious risks and side-effects. Thus author’s premises, the basis of his argument , lack any legitimate evidentiary support and render his conclusion unacceptable.

In addition, the author makes several assumptions that remain unproven. Firstly author assumes that music and art are equivalent to high priced drugs in all areas of medicine. The author does not provide any reasoning behind this assumption of his. Also he assumes that doctors have a preference for high priced and expensive treatments. Maybe for particular illness music and art are not that impactful and drugs are the only option left. Therefore author weaken his argument by making assumptions and failing to provide explicitly the proofs behind the assumptions he assumes exists.

The author could have strengthened his argument by giving case studies where art and music have successfully replaced expensive procedures. Also even better would have been if he could have given examples of cases were expensive drugs could not treat a patient but art/music could .Hence ,while there are several issues with the stated argument, that is not to say that the entire argument is without base. With research and clarification he can improve his argument significantly.

In sum, the author’s illogical argument is based on unsupportive premises and unsubstantiated assumptions that render his conclusion invalid. While we can take that art and music are helpful in field of medicine, accepting that doctors are doing a disservice to their patients and contributing to the rising cost of health care in the United States by giving preference to drugs and expensive procedures over art and music is difficult. If the author hopes to change his reader’s mind on the issue he would have to largely restructure his argument, fix the flaws in his logic, clearly explicate his assumptions and provide evidentiary support.
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3312

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2017, 01:44
Top Contributor
Hi,

first of all in your essay introductio you cite the word "disservice": this is wrong. Disservice is a harmful or injurious service. The doctors follow the medical protocol that is true has side effects but per se is right. It is the state of the science as we know it and as it turns out they apply it to the patients. With consequencely arising costs. But is is not harmful in an absolute sense. What you said is questionable.

Quote:
The primary issue with the authors reasoning lies in his unsubstantial premises. The author simply mentions that art and music have long been understood to have therapeutic effects for individuals suffering from illness. However here he does not provide any statistical proof of his statement. Maybe if author had exemplified his premise with some real patient cases his premise would have held more value. Next premise is the focusing of doctors on costly drug treatments and invasive procedures that carry serious risks and side-effects. Here again author has not given any facts to prove that all costly drugs necessarily have serious risks and side-effects. Thus author’s premises, the basis of his argument , lack any legitimate evidentiary support and render his conclusion unacceptable.

In your first paragraph you barely scratch the flw in the assumption. You do not say WHY they are wrong with precise reasons and example.

Read my new guide to rivise it. https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmatclub-gui ... 36251.html

Hope this helps
_________________
Re: AWA ESSAY-Please Review and tell where I can improve &nbs [#permalink] 22 Mar 2017, 01:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by