jlgdr
fameatop
Balancing a pizza with one hand and having gripped a six-pack carton of soft drinks with another, twenty-three year-old Alan, paused in front of a first floor flat in the colony.
A. Balancing a pizza with one hand and having gripped a six-pack carton of soft drinks with another
B. Having a balance of a pizza with one hand and gripping a six-pack of carton of soft drinks with the other
C. Balancing a pizza with one hand and gripping a pack of six soft drink carton with the other
D. Being balanced a pizza with one hand and gripping a six-pack carton of soft drinks with the another
E. Having balanced a pizza with one hand and having gripped a six-pack carton of soft drinks with the other
I have a doubt in this question, posted by "Marcab"
Use of "another" vs "the other"
"The other", which means "second of two" is correct in this sentence. So options left are B,C, & E.
Option B can be ruled out because it does not maintain parallelism between Perfect participle & Present participle
Option C - maintains parallelism but a small error with "Six soft drink corner"
Option E - As per Marcab & many others this option is correct but i have a doubt in this option.
Although option E maintain parallelism using Perfect participle but perfect participle is used to indicate "Completed actions" and not "Continuing actions". If we use perfect participle in this case, it will mean that "When Alan paused in front of the door, he was neither holding the pizza nor holding the soft drink carton". If we use perfect participle it will change the intended meaning.
Waiting for Inputs from Experts..
C is tricky for the reasons mentioned above
I think E is the best choice here
Experts please advice
Cheers!
J

Perfect participles are used to denote actions that are
just completed.
The problem with E -
E.
Having (just) balanced a pizza with one hand and
having (just) gripped a six-pack carton of soft drinks with the other, Alan
paused at the door.
- is that the
simple past doesn't have a specific time frame and we don't know which action preceded which; also, both are completed actions
He paused at the door, rang the bell and just balanced the pizza. (or)
He just balanced the pizza, rang the bell and paused at the door.
You may argue that in an example like -
Having crossed the bridge, we went in the direction of the town., the sequencing is clear. Here, we know that if you don't cross the bridge, you cannot reach the town. One has to follow the other. Also, the events are widely spread.
In the given question, the events are pretty close ranging from few secs to a couple of minutes. So, what is the sequencing? Did he balance first and then pause at the door? While pausing at the door, the pizza was about to fall, and so he tried to balance it? So many open threads with E.