Bunuel
Bankruptcy is a process that depends on a variety of structural, fiscal, and human variables. These variables are different at every company. Therefore, the pattern of companies declaring bankruptcy should be random. Yet tax records from 2010 demonstrate a pattern: a large number of companies throughout the United States declared bankruptcy at the same time.
Which of the following, if true, forms the best basis for at least a partial explanation for the pattern of bankruptcy shown by the tax records?
A. Certain financial problems affect only some types of businesses with particular sets of characteristics unique to their industry.
B. Many companies go bankrupt because the economies of the states in which they are located force them to go into gradual but increasing debt.
C. Companies without franchises in more than one country are more likely to declare bankruptcy.
D. From 2005-2015, government loans and intervention changed the pattern of bankruptcy in the United States.
E. Patterns of bankruptcy emerge when widespread economic issues affect numerous companies.
Bankruptcy depends on multiple factors like - structural, fiscal and human variables, their combinations and permutations. The outcome is different, and thus each companies pattern declaring bankruptcy is random and different.
But, in 2010 there emerges a pattern in bankruptcy declaration by large number of companies in USA.
Let’s look into the options :
A. Certain financial problems affect only some types of businesses with particular sets of characteristics unique to their industry.
No Where it’s mentioned, that certain types of businesses were affected in USA by this bankruptcy issue. So, eliminated.
B. Many companies go bankrupt because the economies of the states in which they are located force them to go into gradual but increasing debt.
These are location specific issues. But widespread bankruptcy throughout the USA still remains unanswered. So out of scope.
C. Companies without franchises in more than one country are more likely to declare bankruptcy.
Irrelevant option. Franchises and more likely ( probable event) are two reasons for eliminating this choice.
D. From 2005-2015, government loans and intervention changed the pattern of bankruptcy in the United States.
This options seems convincing but, not strong enough to conclude the end. So let’s hold and look the final option.
E. Patterns of bankruptcy emerge when widespread economic issues affect numerous companies.This is the answer, wide spread bankruptcy caused due to widespread economic issues, which has impacted numerous businesses. Hence, we can scrap out option D and lock E.