May I seek a small clarification from Mimi?
Mimi has said that that there has to be a comma between
fact and
when, because “when combined with their do-or-die will power” is a non-restrictive modifier (that is, not essential to the meaning of the sentence).
When I coined the passage, I precisely wanted to make it restrictive and hence deliberately left out the comma. Let us say, if the sentence had a comma as Mimi suggests, it would run as this with an in-built parenthesis.
and this fact, when combined with their do or die will power, made
Now, if you remove the parenthesis momentarily because it is not essential to the crux of the passage, then according to me, the meaning gets substantially altered. To make them a dreaded lot, you require two things i.e., firstly, the fact that they knew the pulse and beat of each and every corner of the terrain …… and secondly, this fact’s combination with their do or die will power. If the second thing was not there, they would not be considered a dreaded lot
If this was the underlying thought, would GMAT have used a comma? I look forward to some comments.
Secondly,
a fact in Choices A, B and C does not modify terrain. If it were to modify terrain, a relative pronoun such as
which with preceding comma or
that without a preceding comma would have been used. In the given case,
a fact stands for the liberation forces’ knowledge of the pulse and beat of each and every corner of the terrain. A, B and C have the problem of using “combining”
_________________
Thank you Daagh for your time on GMAT Club and all your contributions! Thank you for everything you did!Your work will remain a great tribute to you here on GMAT Club!
-bb