GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Sep 2018, 20:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 566
Location: San Jose, CA
Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2004, 19:15
1
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:44) correct 57% (01:23) wrong based on 122 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly any difference between their psychological capacities. The most reasonable explanation for these results is the inadequacy of the studies.

An unstated premise of the above argument is that:


A) Psychological capacities cannot be assessed objectively.

B) Biased researchers frequently misinterpret the results of their studies.

C) Young humans and chimps have underdeveloped psychological capacities.

D) The psychological capacities of babies and young chimps differ significantly.

E) Examining the central nervous system is a better way to assess psychological capacity than to study behavior.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 96
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2004, 19:36
If babies = young humans, then D is the answer.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4217
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2004, 22:08
Is it that straightforward? I may be misunderstanding this question but it seems to be asking for an assumption, not an inference as hinted by D. D is directly stated by the first sentence but is not an assumption. A is the answer IMO.

Argument: chimps = young humans, as proved by studies --> studies must be inadequate. Why? This is where assumption comes into play: The author is assuming that psychological cannot be assessed objectively. If the assumption is negated and that psychological faculties CAN be assessed, then there is no reason for the author to say that the studies is inadequate in the first place and the argument falls apart.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 589
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2004, 00:35
Paul wrote:
Is it that straightforward? I may be misunderstanding this question but it seems to be asking for an assumption, not an inference as hinted by D. D is directly stated by the first sentence but is not an assumption. A is the answer IMO.

Argument: chimps = young humans, as proved by studies --> studies must be inadequate. Why? This is where assumption comes into play: The author is assuming that psychological cannot be assessed objectively. If the assumption is negated and that psychological faculties CAN be assessed, then there is no reason for the author to say that the studies is inadequate in the first place and the argument falls apart.


I too got A and was amazed to see the support for D; I thought I was totally wrong.

In addition to Paul's explanation, the words "most reasonable explanation" also hint the author's assumption that objective study is not possible.

Btw, just to understand, doesn't D contradict the stem? Stem says "reveal hardly any difference"; D says "differ significantly".
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 250
Location: Hanoi
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2004, 03:59
Paul wrote:
Is it that straightforward? I may be misunderstanding this question but it seems to be asking for an assumption, not an inference as hinted by D. D is directly stated by the first sentence but is not an assumption. A is the answer IMO.

Argument: chimps = young humans, as proved by studies --> studies must be inadequate. Why? This is where assumption comes into play: The author is assuming that psychological cannot be assessed objectively. If the assumption is negated and that psychological faculties CAN be assessed, then there is no reason for the author to say that the studies is inadequate in the first place and the argument falls apart.


I don't think D is stated by the first sentence

"Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly any difference between their psychological capacities"

It is a premise and I think D another one.
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 566
Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2004, 15:17
Folks
The OA is D ... I also selected A
I am still not getting a hang of why D is correct :(

Anyways here's the explanation provided from source

The unstated premise here refers to a belief which is not specified, but which is basic to the conclusions. Look over the alternatives carefully and see which of these statements must be assumed to be true in order to reach the conclusion.
(A) does not account for the conclusion, and in fact, there is evidence for the opposite assumption (what does this mean?). The fact that the researchers are relying on behavioral studies indicates that they think these differences can be measured. The critics must think so also for their criticism to make sense.
(D) The reason that an explanation of the results is sought indicates that the writer thinks there is a significant difference between chimps and humans, and therefore, the finding of no significant difference must be somehow explained. This is the best alternative.
(E) This is obviously an incorrect alternative. The writers chose to use behavioral methods.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4217
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2004, 17:59
I see the point for D and I agree it could be the answer. However, there is an extremely weak job at refuting A
Quote:
The fact that the researchers are relying on behavioral studies indicates that they think these differences can be measured

This is totally not true. The critics could very well conclude that the studies were inadequate because those differences cannot be measured. The given explanation basically says that because researchers conducted the studies, the differences must be measurable: This is totally wrong. What is the source of this question? I'm about to throw in an ad hominem here :)
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 235
  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2005, 19:31
D.

Establishes the reason why the author could logically come to the conclusion that the studies are inadequate.

A is incorrect as if adequate studies were conducted the assessment can be objective. B, nothing about bias in the stem. C, not true based on the stem. E, out of scope.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2961
Premium Member
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2018, 09:58
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly &nbs [#permalink] 05 Jul 2018, 09:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Behavioral studies of young chimpanzees and young humans reveal hardly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.