OE for reference:
Overview:The argument notes that biologists often announce that a certain kind of animal has been found capable of using tools. It states that these announcements are unsurprising since all animals use tools. It then provides several examples in which animals use external physical objects to their advantage, such as fish hiding in mud to escape predators. The argument ends by stating a principle, that any use of a physical object to achieve an animal's purpose can reasonably be regarded as an instance of tool use.
The question asks you to identify the role played in the argument by the claim that the biologists' announcements are unsurprising.
The Correct Answer:B In the second half of the passage, the examples of animals using physical objects to their advantage, such as fish hiding in mud to escape predators, are not prototypical examples of tool use, such as using a stick to hunt for ants, but they are understood to be widespread, and by the principle stated at the end of the passage, they count as tool use also. So the second half of the passage is presented as support for the claim that all animals use tools. The claim that all animals use tools is, in turn, the basis of the claim that biologists' announcements of newly discovered instances of tool use are unsurprising. Since everything else in the passage is presented in support of the claim that biologists' announcements of newly discovered instances of animal tool use are unsurprising, that claim is most accurately regarded as the conclusion of the argument.
The Incorrect Answer Choices:A All of the animal activities discussed in the passage are presented as purposeful, including the prototypical examples of tool use of the sort announced by biologists, and the use of physical objects to an animal's advantage that are presented as less prototypical cases of tool use. The claim that biologists' announcements of tool use are unsurprising is not presented as evidence that the animal's behavior is purposeful in any of these examples.
C Assumptions are unstated. The claim that biologists' announcements of tool use are unsurprising, on the other hand, is explicitly stated in the passage. Moreover, that claim does not, in itself, contain any information about what qualifies as a tool. So it cannot be used to justify the broader conception of a tool that is described in the last sentence of the passage.
D The passage does not provide any characterization of the biologists' conception of a tool. So the claim in question cannot be used to call that conception into question.
E The biologists' announcements, as characterized in the passage, do not use the word "external." So the argument cannot be attributing to the biologists' announcements any weakness stemming from their use of the word "external."