VishakhaBharti
Hi,
I have some confusion in option C.
If option C only said - "There are no birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older than the bird fossils" - Then, I agree, this is the assumption on which the conclusion "that the birds could not have been descended from birdlike dinosaur species" is true.
However, by including the last bit in this sentence that says "but have not yet been unearthed", so the complete assumption now reads - "There are no birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older than the bird fossils but have not yet been unearthed." - how can author believe that some of these fossils may not yet have been discovered and still arrive at the conclusion that the birds could not have been descended from birdlike dinosaur species??
Can someone please help, I am not sure what I am I missing here?
The word "but" here might be causing the confusion.
(C) rules out the existence of a set of birdlike dinosaur fossils. These particular fossils fit
both of the following criteria:
1) They are older than bird fossils.
2) They have not yet been unearthed.
If these fossils DO exist, the author's argument is in big trouble. So, we need to assume that they DON'T exist.
That's why (C) is the assumption on which the argument relies.
I hope that helps!