Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
35%
(00:44)
correct 65%
(01:17)
wrong
based on 25
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining
If the publishers profits have been declining over the years, they can no longer "afford" publishing the books, which they believe brings no profit but just expense. If they were doing it out of charity before, now as their profits are decreasing, they no longer can afford to do so.
Can anybody please tell me what the official answer is?
My answer is A. The reason:
1. The conclusion says "nowadays, more than ever, book publishers ....." 2. I need to find a reason as to why it is not really profit that motivates book publishers nowadays especially as compared to before.
A answered this criterion best.
If the Official answer (is this what is being abbreviated as OA?) is something else, can you please explain?
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining
Show more
Applying the classical PowerScore procedure of solving CR questions -
A and D are too exaggerated in stating "have always been". Stay away from over-hype. C does not explain how some books of intrinsic value generating sizable profit unexpectedly in the past is related to the publishers becoming more interested in only making more money. E on the other hand strengthens the conclusion, by stating that profits have been declining, it can easily be understood that publishers are looking to make more money.
After thus eliminating all other options - B is the sole contender. In other words, it is not that publishers are more interested in making more money but rather, the decline in good books that makes it seem like the publishers are getting greedier.
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining
Show more
In B, it suggests that there is another factor(quality decline) to the fewer of these book publication: not because publishers more interested in making money.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.