GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Feb 2019, 16:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.
• ### Free GMAT RC Webinar

February 23, 2019

February 23, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT

# By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Training
Joined: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 89
GPA: 3.7
By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 04 Jan 2019, 20:49
2
4
Question 1
00:00

based on 64 sessions

12% (03:04) correct 88% (03:33) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 57 sessions

17% (01:31) correct 83% (01:34) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 50 sessions

27% (02:31) correct 73% (02:00) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

based on 48 sessions

42% (01:45) correct 58% (01:35) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue, scientists have been able to prove that 25% of all carbon molecules consumed by Americans originate in corn. One of the most ubiquitous substances in the North American diet, corn has seemingly innumerable, multifarious uses. Each corn kernel’s endosperm contains a preponderance of starch, a substance made of glucose molecules connected by glycosidic bonds which create long and complex chains of carbohydrate molecules that scientists have learned to separate and rearrange to form crucial raw materials for food and other industries. In the form of cattle feed, corn provides the key ingredient in the production of cheap meat, the basis of the contemporary American diet, while high fructose corn syrup is the major component of carbonated beverages so popular in the West. It could be argued that the current American way of life is not imaginable without the abundant supply of this staple crop. Therefore, given the multitude of corn’s benefits unlocked by modern technology, it is ironic that an earlier culture equally dependent on it for sustenance might have been severely hampered by its limitations.

According to most scientists, corn is a mutated descendent of teosinte, a wild grass native to Central America. The ears of the teosinte plant were not large, encased the seeds in a hard envelope and contained much less seed than comparable grains, making them unappealing to primitive humans. However, several thousand years ago, an evolutionary jump redesigned the teosinte. The tassel, the male inflorescence at the end of a primary lateral branch of the plant, underwent a feminization which monopolized the resources of the lateral branch, creating larger ears with a corresponding number of seeds with higher nutritional content.

This evolutionary path is, according to anthropologist Jared Diamond, a key to the condition of pre-Columbian American societies. While Eurasian societies had an abundance of wild grains available for cultivation and, therefore, moved to agriculture tens of thousands of years ago, a time period which allowed for the creation of large populations and, eventually, a market for advanced technologies, pre-Columbian Americans had no enticement to form agricultural societies. They made this move relatively late and therefore had no time to create societies as large and complex as the Europeans, a fact that led to their defeat when the latter arrived in Central America.

Diamond’s argument is not only innovative and parsimonious but relies on a seemingly unassailable basis of our knowledge of the evolutionary biology of corn. However, historical considerations make one reluctant to accept the veracity of Diamond’s elegant argumentation. Whenever they started to grow, as we now know, Central American societies achieved significant demographic growth and technological progress and were able to mobilize significant resources for the conduct of war. Therefore, one must seek the roots of their defeat not in their dependence on corn but in factors such as epidemics launched by European arrival and the political dissensions in their midst.

Q1: Which of the following, if true, would weaken the author's objections to Diamond's theory?

(A) Although the population of pre-Columbian America was decimated by disease, the armies arrayed against the Europeans did not suffer the same fate because they did not live in close quarters.
(B) While they were outnumbered, the Europeans' use of iron breastplates allowed them to withstand the impact of bronze-tipped arrows used by pre-Columbian Americans.
(C) Remains of pre-historic agricultural societies in Eurasia show evidence of sophisticated technologies at much higher levels than those achieved by American societies at that time.
(D) Some societies of pre-Columbian America were strong enough to enforce their will on their neighbors and drew on those resources to present a united front against a third party.
(E) The average size of a pre-Columbian American village and the average yield of its crops were only half as large as their European counterparts.[/list]
OA - B

Q2: The author of the passage is mainly concerned with

(A) debating the negative influence of corn's evolutionary development on the conflicts between the pre-Columbian Americans and Europeans, in contrast to corn's positive influence on our society today
(B) comparing the uses of corn in the present to the use of teosinte in the past, which led pre-Columbian American societies to develop in drastically different ways from their European counterparts, possibly leading to the former's downfall
(C) arguing against the theories of Jared Diamond which stipulate that corn's late evolutionary development caused Native American societies to develop later than European societies, leading to the former's downfall
(D) discussing the effects of corn on both the current American society and the pre-Columbian American society, which, as Jared Diamond argues so elegantly, caused the latter's downfall in its conflict with the Europeans
(E) explaining the benefits of corn's use today and explaining how the theory that corn's use by pre-Columbian American societies put them at a disadvantage in comparison to European societies is at odds with today's knowledge of the former
OA - A

Q3: According to Jared Diamond, immediately after teosinte's mutation

(A) pre-Columbian American societies turned to agriculture
(B) its descendant was the only grain available for cultivation in the pre-Columbian Americas
(C) corn did not yet possess nutritional value equivalent to those of other grains
(D) pre-Columbian American societies started to cultivate corn and other wild grains
(E) the disparity between pre-Columbian American and Eurasian populations was equal to the disparity between the two populations during the Europeans' arrival to the Americas
OA - B

Q4: One purpose of the second paragraph is to

(A) compare the uses and effects of a plant on a culture to the uses and effects, described in the first paragraph, of that plants' descendent on another culture
(B) put forth a scientific fact which clarifies a statement made in the first paragraph and whose possible historical significance is presented in the third paragraph
(C) explain a statement made in the first paragraph whose possible implications are detailed in the third paragraph
(D) describe a scientific process whose possible implications, according to one scholar, are detailed in the third paragraph and fourth paragraphs
(E) provide scientific background information that explains the topic which the author is most concerned with in the first paragraph[/list]
OA - B

_________________

KUDOS please if my post was useful!

Originally posted by mattce on 22 Jun 2013, 17:56.
Last edited by workout on 04 Jan 2019, 20:49, edited 2 times in total.
Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2013
Posts: 16
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 04 Jan 2019, 20:46
1
11
By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue, scientists have been able to prove that 25% of all carbon molecules consumed by Americans originate in corn. One of the most ubiquitous substances in the North American diet, corn has seemingly innumerable, multifarious uses. Each corn kernel’s endosperm contains a preponderance of starch, a substance made of glucose molecules connected by glycosidic bonds which create long and complex chains of carbohydrate molecules that scientists have learned to separate and rearrange to form crucial raw materials for food and other industries. In the form of cattle feed, corn provides the key ingredient in the production of cheap meat, the basis of the contemporary American diet, while high fructose corn syrup is the major component of carbonated beverages so popular in the West. It could be argued that the current American way of life is not imaginable without the abundant supply of this staple crop. Therefore, given the multitude of corn’s benefits unlocked by modern technology, it is ironic that an earlier culture equally dependent on it for sustenance might have been severely hampered by its limitations.

According to most scientists, corn is a mutated descendent of teosinte, a wild grass native to Central America. The ears of the teosinte plant were not large, encased the seeds in a hard envelope and contained much less seed than comparable grains, making them unappealing to primitive humans. However, several thousand years ago, an evolutionary jump redesigned the teosinte. The tassel, the male inflorescence at the end of a primary lateral branch of the plant, underwent a feminization which monopolized the resources of the lateral branch, creating larger ears with a corresponding number of seeds with higher nutritional content.

This evolutionary path is, according to anthropologist Jared Diamond, a key to the condition of pre-Columbian American societies. While Eurasian societies had an abundance of wild grains available for cultivation and, therefore, moved to agriculture tens of thousands of years ago, a time period which allowed for the creation of large populations and, eventually, a market for advanced technologies, pre-Columbian Americans had no enticement to form agricultural societies. They made this move relatively late and therefore had no time to create societies as large and complex as the Europeans, a fact that led to their defeat when the latter arrived in Central America.

Diamond’s argument is not only innovative and parsimonious but relies on a seemingly unassailable basis of our knowledge of the evolutionary biology of corn. However, historical considerations make one reluctant to accept the veracity of Diamond’s elegant argumentation. Whenever they started to grow, as we now know, Central American societies achieved significant demographic growth and technological progress and were able to mobilize significant resources for the conduct of war. Therefore, one must seek the roots of their defeat not in their dependence on corn but in factors such as epidemics launched by European arrival and the political dissensions in their midst.

Q1: Which of the following, if true, would weaken the author's objections to Diamond's theory?

(A) Although the population of pre-Columbian America was decimated by disease, the armies arrayed against the Europeans did not suffer the same fate because they did not live in close quarters.
(B) While they were outnumbered, the Europeans' use of iron breastplates allowed them to withstand the impact of bronze-tipped arrows used by pre-Columbian Americans.
(C) Remains of pre-historic agricultural societies in Eurasia show evidence of sophisticated technologies at much higher levels than those achieved by American societies at that time.
(D) Some societies of pre-Columbian America were strong enough to enforce their will on their neighbors and drew on those resources to present a united front against a third party.
(E) The average size of a pre-Columbian American village and the average yield of its crops were only half as large as their European counterparts.[/list]
OA - B

Q2: The author of the passage is mainly concerned with

(A) debating the negative influence of corn's evolutionary development on the conflicts between the pre-Columbian Americans and Europeans, in contrast to corn's positive influence on our society today
(B) comparing the uses of corn in the present to the use of teosinte in the past, which led pre-Columbian American societies to develop in drastically different ways from their European counterparts, possibly leading to the former's downfall
(C) arguing against the theories of Jared Diamond which stipulate that corn's late evolutionary development caused Native American societies to develop later than European societies, leading to the former's downfall
(D) discussing the effects of corn on both the current American society and the pre-Columbian American society, which, as Jared Diamond argues so elegantly, caused the latter's downfall in its conflict with the Europeans
(E) explaining the benefits of corn's use today and explaining how the theory that corn's use by pre-Columbian American societies put them at a disadvantage in comparison to European societies is at odds with today's knowledge of the former
OA - A

Q3: According to Jared Diamond, immediately after teosinte's mutation

(A) pre-Columbian American societies turned to agriculture
(B) its descendant was the only grain available for cultivation in the pre-Columbian Americas
(C) corn did not yet possess nutritional value equivalent to those of other grains
(D) pre-Columbian American societies started to cultivate corn and other wild grains
(E) the disparity between pre-Columbian American and Eurasian populations was equal to the disparity between the two populations during the Europeans' arrival to the Americas
OA - B

Q4: One purpose of the second paragraph is to

(A) compare the uses and effects of a plant on a culture to the uses and effects, described in the first paragraph, of that plants' descendent on another culture
(B) put forth a scientific fact which clarifies a statement made in the first paragraph and whose possible historical significance is presented in the third paragraph
(C) explain a statement made in the first paragraph whose possible implications are detailed in the third paragraph
(D) describe a scientific process whose possible implications, according to one scholar, are detailed in the third paragraph and fourth paragraphs
(E) provide scientific background information that explains the topic which the author is most concerned with in the first paragraph[/list]
OA - B

Originally posted by shailendrasharma on 14 Jul 2013, 05:20.
Last edited by workout on 04 Jan 2019, 20:46, edited 2 times in total.
##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 27 May 2013
Posts: 24
Schools: Mannheim"17
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2013, 01:41
hi,

Diamond's point:- Europeans had more number & high technology due to corn and its usage.
on the other hand American societies had no time to create societies as large and complex as the Europeans as they did not cultivate more and as result they were defeated.

Author's argument:-this is not the reason.
they also had man power after they started cultivating grains.
the reason is 1)epidemic & 2) politics.

question :to weaken the author's argument.

IMO B which is the OA provides an alternative reason for defeat, I dont think so it can be the best choice.

while A & C could be potential answers, but C assumes to much, thus A can be a good answer.

kindly correct if wrong!
My Choice-A

thanks,
Aniket
Cheerz!
Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 160
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2013, 19:35
Whoa ! ! ! I did all wrong . . Can you provide explanations plz . .

for 1 I marked A . We need to weaken the fact that other factors were more important than corn. 1 says that the disease did not affect army, therefore it weakens other factor.
B was my last choice it provides another reason for defeat and strengthens the objections against Diamonds theory

2. I marked D, there is some glitch in last part " caused latter's downfall but para mentions objections to it too" , but why A . its not a debate .

3. I marked E, because diamond assumed that the dependence on teosinte's mutation (corn) disadvantaged Americans , he believed that the situation was same immediately upon mutation and when Europeans arrived. . How can we infer that the descendant was only crop. Nothing such mentioned in para.

4. I marked D . the mutation is described as a process and implications are presented in 3rd and 4th para. How can it be B , which statement in first para is described in 2nd para. The last line of first para just states that corn had limitations what is its link with the mutation process. D seems better.

Any other explanations plz
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Current Student
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Posts: 64
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2013, 22:22
are the OA correct ,i also got all wrong...
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 243
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2013, 23:41
Even I got all wrong except the last one.
A C D B
Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 157
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2013, 14:27
This passage is from the Economist GMAT test... Brutal passage... Got all of them wrong
_________________

You've been walking the ocean's edge, holding up your robes to keep them dry. You must dive naked under, and deeper under, a thousand times deeper! - Rumi

http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index.php/author/cbermanmanhattanprep-com/ - This is worth its weight in gold

Economist GMAT Test - 730, Q50, V41 Aug 9th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 670, Q45, V36 Aug 11th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 680, Q47, V36 Aug 17th, 2013
GmatPrep CAT 1 - 770, Q50, V44 Aug 24th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 690, Q45, V39 Aug 30th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 710, Q48, V39 Sep 13th, 2013
GmatPrep CAT 2 - 740, Q49, V41 Oct 6th, 2013

GMAT - 770, Q50, V44, Oct 7th, 2013
My Debrief - http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-the-ashes-thou-shall-rise-770-q-50-v-44-awa-5-ir-162299.html#p1284542

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 145
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: HBS '19 (S)
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2013, 10:26
Got only the last one right ... the OAs don't look right ... can anyone explain all the answers ??
Manager
Joined: 13 May 2011
Posts: 177
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.2
WE: Accounting (Consulting)
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 02:41
Hm, I answered D A B D.
Q1 - I really first thought to answer B (correct answer), author's objection:
"Central American societies achieved significant demographic growth and technological progress and were able to mobilize significant resources for the conduct of war."
To weaken this, we need to prove that demographic growth wasn't enough / technological progress wasn't enough / they couldn't mobilize.
A - deals with authors opinion, not objections. - pass
B - proves that technological progress wasn't enough. NOTE
C - to general, not clear what technologies, did it affect they encounter? - pass, B is stronger
D - proves that mobilization argument is wrong. NOTE
E - irrelevant. talks about general populations, it wasn't europe vs. america continent battle.
Now I know why D is wrong:
................Population.. Progress ........Mobilization
Diamond .......Weak .........Weak .... Weak (non-complex)
Author .........Strong ......Strong ...... Weak
B .................-- ........... Weak .......... -- .................. - contradicts Author, supports Diamond.w
D ................ -- ............ -- ......... Strong ................. - contradicts both, supports no one.

So, my second mistake:
Second para gives us: history of corn and evolution from non-agricultural plant to agricultural (appealing).
A) irrelevant. pass
B) scientific fact - true, consequences in 3rd para - true, 1st para statement clarification - ???
C) explain statement if 1st para - ??? implications in 3rd - true.
D) scientific process - true, Diamond - true, 3rd para - true, 4th - false (I missed this!!!), pass
E) scientific topic - true, most concerned in frst para - ???
So now we have B C E, all referring to first para (B C - statement, E - most concerned)
1st para:
All statements:
"By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue, scientists have been able to prove that 25% of all carbon molecules consumed by Americans originate in corn."
One of the most ubiquitous substances in the North American diet, corn
corn has seemingly innumerable, multifarious uses.
Each corn kernel’s endosperm contains a preponderance of starch
scientists have learned to separate and rearrange to form crucial raw materials for food and other industries
In the form of cattle feed, corn provides the key ingredient in the production of cheap meat
meat, the basis of the contemporary American diet
high fructose corn syrup is the major component of carbonated beverages so popular in the West
the current American way of life is not imaginable without the abundant supply of this staple crop.
"an earlier culture equally dependent on it for sustenance might have been severely hampered by its limitations."
Now, para2 doesn't provide explanation for hampering earlier culture by corn's limitations, though it explains this limitations to some extent. hence C and E are wrong.
B - ok, this seem to work because it uses the word "clarification", it doesn't explain the statement, but it clarifies what kind of limitations we are talking about.

I missed that (totally) and I missed false statement about para.4 in D. I just thought, "well this paragraph explains nothing from para1, so D should be closer", I missed "clarification".
_________________

Stay positive! ^.^

My blog - http://www.mbafortech.com

Manager
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 104
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2015, 09:43
'B' says historical significance is discussed in the 3rd para - which is true.

'C' says possible implications are discussed in the 3rd para - Not true!
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 96
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Duke '19 (II)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2015, 05:06
1
Q1. I marked (C)

My (incorrect) reasoning runs as follows: Given evidence of the sophisticated technologies available to Eurasia, the fact that they won is not surprising and is in line with what Diamond has stated (which weakens the author's position that Americans did indeed have comparable tech).

Looks like the mention of "pre-historic" as against "pre-Columbian" the only problem in (C)? Is anyone able to validate?

Q2. I marked (C)

It's incorrect, apparently, but I am still convinced it is the right option. Comments, anyone?

Q3. I marked (E)

Isn't it a bit far-fetched to go from "no enticement" to "only grain available"? Or does "no enticement" automatically signify that there was absolutely no other crop available?

Since the test is adaptive, I also got another question -

Which of the following is not mentioned in the passage about teosinte?
(A)Because it had fewer overall seeds than similar grains and the small seeds it did have were covered by a hard shell, teosinte was inedible to primitive humans.
(B)After a part of the teosinte plant underwent a drastic genetic change, it absorbed most of the nutrients gathered by the branch to which it was attached.
(C)An evolutionary jump changed teosinte's small ears into larger ones with higher nutritional value, setting it on the path to becoming what we now know as corn.
(D)When the teosinte's male inflorescence at the end of a branch began to consume all the available resources of that branch, the resulting ears became better for human consumption.
(E)The change in teosinte's tassel, which created ears more beneficial to humans, played a central role, in Jared Diamond's opinion, in the fate of pre-Columbian American societies.

(A) - It is not said "inedible". The author only mentions that it was "unappealing".

_________________

If you like this post, be kind and help me with Kudos!

Cheers!

Manager
Joined: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 83
GPA: 3.92
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2016, 15:42
aniketmunshi wrote:
hi,

Diamond's point:- Europeans had more number & high technology due to corn and its usage.
on the other hand American societies had no time to create societies as large and complex as the Europeans as they did not cultivate more and as result they were defeated.

Author's argument:-this is not the reason.
they also had man power after they started cultivating grains.
the reason is 1)epidemic & 2) politics.

question :to weaken the author's argument.

IMO B which is the OA provides an alternative reason for defeat, I dont think so it can be the best choice.

while A & C could be potential answers, but C assumes to much, thus A can be a good answer.

kindly correct if wrong!
My Choice-A

thanks,
Aniket
Cheerz!

After reading the passage the second time (yes second time ) "B" seems to make perfect sense, heres why:

In the 3rd para, Diamond states:Europeans were able to create a large population and, eventually, a market for advanced technologies, where as pre-Columbian Americans had no enticement to form agricultural societies. They made this move relatively late and therefore had no time to create societies as large and complex as the Europeans.

In the 4th Para, the author states: Central American societies achieved significant demographic growth and technological progress and were able to mobilize significant resources for the conduct of war. Therefore, one must seek the roots of their defeat not in their dependence on corn but in factors such as epidemics launched by European arrival and the political dissensions in their midst.

Now, to prove the author wrong, we need an answer that will clearly emphasize that Europe was way superior as compared to Central America in terms of technology and this being the main reason for Central Americas defeat and not factors such as epidemics or political dissension.
Answer B clearly emphasizes how European technology (iron breastplates) was superior to the American technology (bronze-tipped arrows).

Hope this helps!
_________________

If you analyze enough data, you can predict the future.....its calculating probability, nothing more!

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 358
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
Schools: Booth '21 (D)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2017, 02:37
alimeca09 wrote:
are all OA correct

They seem to be right . i got only 1 wrong. If you have particular doubts shoot them. I can try to explain from my view point!
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2015
Posts: 111
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2017, 21:10
would you kindly explain #4 please?

goforgmat wrote:
alimeca09 wrote:
are all OA correct

They seem to be right . i got only 1 wrong. If you have particular doubts shoot them. I can try to explain from my view point!
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2018
Posts: 111
Location: India
Concentration: Real Estate, Finance
GPA: 3.58
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2018, 03:21
I argue for Option C . Option B says that second paragraph puts forth a fact . But it is not just mentioning a fact , it is actually explaining .
MBA Section Director
Affiliations: GMATClub
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 2114
Concentration: Nonprofit
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2019, 20:42

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions

_________________
Senior PS Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 722
Re: By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2019, 00:14
Brutal passage. 6 mins 10 secs and all wrong

Looks like I need to re-attempt this after I get that brain implant I have been saving up for.
_________________

Regards,

“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)

Senior PS Moderator
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 722
By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2019, 00:41
1
Stumbled across the OE and passage map. Let me post it for the benefit of us mortals who succumbed to this brutal passage.

Passage map:
Notice that the first sentence is a little off-topic; you must read several sentences of the first paragraph before you can establish what it's about:
Paragraph I: Corn is both a staple of modern American diet and a 'multipurpose' plant
Paragraph II: Corn has evolved from teosinte, a less attractive crop
Paragraph III: Jared Diamond claims Corn's late evolution delayed pre-Columbian societies' move to agriculture
Paragraph IV: The author disagrees with Diamond. The author, although he or she praises Diamond's eloquence, does not support his ideas.

Main idea question. The tough part is choosing between the answers that are so close to each other.
Q2: The author of the passage is mainly concerned with

(A) debating the negative influence of corn's evolutionary development on the conflicts between the pre-Columbian Americans and Europeans, in contrast to corn's positive influence on our society today. Correct answer. We know that corn has brought benefit to our society today, and yet in the past its late evolution may have brought disaster upon pre-Columbian peoples (as Jared Diamond suggests). However, the author debates this point of view, offering evidence that contradicts Diamond's theory.
(B) comparing the uses of corn in the present to the use of teosinte in the past, which led pre-Columbian American societies to develop in drastically different ways from their European counterparts, possibly leading to the former's downfall. Discard. It was the relatively late evolution of corn, not the use of teosinte, that may have led to the downfall of pre-Columbian American societies. The second paragraph, in which teosinte is discussed, does not discuss the use of teosinte, if it in fact was used at all.
(C) arguing against the theories of Jared Diamond which stipulate that corn's late evolutionary development caused Native American societies to develop later than European societies, leading to the former's downfall. Discard. Although this answer choice correctly summarizes many of the topics of the passage, it does not include the information presented in the first paragraph, making it too narrow.
(D) discussing the effects of corn on both the current American society and the pre-Columbian American society, which, as Jared Diamond argues so elegantly, caused the latter's downfall in its conflict with the Europeans. Discard. This answer choice incorrectly represents the author's opinion of Diamond's theory. The author, although he or she praises Diamond's eloquence, does not support his ideas.
(E) explaining the benefits of corn's use today and explaining how the theory that corn's use by pre-Columbian American societies put them at a disadvantage in comparison to European societies is at odds with today's knowledge of the former. TRAP - Diamond's theory does not propose that the use of corn led to the downfall of pre-Columbian societies but that the effects of corn's late evolution were responsible.

Quote:
OE: Comments on how one could possibly attempt such a dense passage in 2 mins per question time constraint -
For the first paragraph, read until you get the general idea. 1-3 sentences should be sufficient, but there's no clear cut definition. When the paragraph starts to drag you into the specifics, move on. For the other paragraphs, read the first sentence carefully, but you can also skim the next couple of sentences (read quickly, without bothering to understand or memorize), just to see that there are no major changes in the main idea of the paragraph, as presented in the first sentence.

A process of elimination could have looked like this -

Eliminate the more obvious answer choices that clearly do not match the main idea from the Initial Reading:

- Answer choice C is too specific because it excludes information from the first paragraph,
- D is suspect because it puts Prof. Jared on a pedestal ("argues so elegantly") which the last paragraph takes him down from;
- E is incorrect because it's not the use of corn that brought the downfall - it's teosinte's evolutionary path.
- Regarding B, it could be argued that the passage does not really compare the use of corn to the use of teosinte - both were used extensively, and the comparison is between the evolutionary paths both took, not between their relevant use. You, therefore, have grounds for eliminating B.

I will post explanations to other questions when I find them or spend more time on understanding how to tackle them.
_________________

Regards,

“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)

By identifying stable isotopes of carbon-12 in human tissue,   [#permalink] 05 Jan 2019, 00:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by