Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
I really didn't see any pattern in these threads the last two years that looked like there was any connection between when someone submitted and when they received an interview. This does fit the potential pattern last year of interviews going out first to mostly overseas applicants. This at least makes logical sense, as there are probably fewer alumni working overseas and logistically it might take more time for them to schedule and execute an interview. And I imagine that Stanford would hate to miss the opportunity to speak with an all star candidate simply because they delayed reaching out to them - not only to interview them, but meeting a successful alumnus is probably a great recruitment tool. This may be completely false and simply a byproduct of the small sample size, but it is worth noting that this "pattern" might be emerging for the second straight year.
I really didn't see any pattern in these threads the last two years that looked like there was any connection between when someone submitted and when they received an interview. This does fit the potential pattern last year of interviews going out first to mostly overseas applicants. This at least makes logical sense, as there are probably fewer alumni working overseas and logistically it might take more time for them to schedule and execute an interview. And I imagine that Stanford would hate to miss the opportunity to speak with an all star candidate simply because they delayed reaching out to them - not only to interview them, but meeting a successful alumnus is probably a great recruitment tool. This may be completely false and simply a byproduct of the small sample size, but it is worth noting that this "pattern" might be emerging for the second straight year.
Show more
But does Stanford really need to "recruit"? Who turns down Stanford? I suppose there are some folks who might choose HBS over Stanford... totally depends on the person, I guess.
Dei, are the applications read in the order they are submitted? Thanks !
Show more
I don't think so (don't think there's any order to it). But I do know that they are working incredibly hard (i.e. through the weekends) to get through the applications.
I got my interview invite last year about 2 weeks before the end of the interview window. I know it's tough, but you just have to wait
But I do know that they are working incredibly hard (i.e. through the weekends) to get through the applications.
Show more
Sometimes we forget how hard the adcom members work to give our applications due respect and consideration. Imagining them hard at work eases the anxiety a little bit.
There's really no pattern to the invites - just the order they read the applications. I know of a NoCal local who received an invite today.
Good luck everyone!
Show more
So you're saying the pattern is they send to people in California who are friends of people on this board first? Kidding.
Thank you for the heads up. Seems the bulk of the invites have gone out in mid-November the last couple of years, but I guess I can officially start hoping for an invitation now.
Or anyone from London? Getting very nervous here! Harvard seems highly unlikely now that 2 wednesdays have passed so not sure if hoping for Stanford even makes much sense as I would have thought they interview even fewer applicants! YIKES!
Or anyone from London? Getting very nervous here! Harvard seems highly unlikely now that 2 wednesdays have passed so not sure if hoping for Stanford even makes much sense as I would have thought they interview even fewer applicants! YIKES!
Show more
Same thoughts here. If HBS is not inviting, then Stan chances are even slimmer. I guess Stanford invites 15% of applicants for interviews.
Still waiting here. A couple of friends who were accepted to GSB last year got their invites around mid-november. I think its good to get the invite late novemeber, that way for now we can focus on preparing for the other interviews. I have heard that GSB makes you schedule your interview in 2 weeks tops.
Congratulations to the people who have been invited!
Or anyone from London? Getting very nervous here! Harvard seems highly unlikely now that 2 wednesdays have passed so not sure if hoping for Stanford even makes much sense as I would have thought they interview even fewer applicants! YIKES!
Same thoughts here. If HBS is not inviting, then Stan chances are even slimmer. I guess Stanford invites 15% of applicants for interviews.
Show more
Not necessarily. A typical Stanford class is very different than a Harvard class. And the admission committee for each school looks for different criteria (as can be seen in their essay questions) while selecting a class. I know many rockstars who get accepted to Harvard but do not even get an invite from Stanford and vice versa. So not getting an invite from Harvard, does not have much bearing on Stanford's decision. Yes, Stanford is more selective than Harvard but it is so on different factors.