Last visit was: 29 Apr 2026, 06:01 It is currently 29 Apr 2026, 06:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
scott2013
Joined: 10 Mar 2011
Last visit: 21 Jun 2018
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Affiliations: CFA Society of San Francisco (Affiliate Member), American Society for Quality (Enterprise Member)
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 630 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 650 Q39 V40
WE:Supply Chain Management (Aerospace and Defense)
GMAT 2: 650 Q39 V40
Posts: 21
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
estreet
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Last visit: 27 Jun 2016
Posts: 137
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 67
Schools:Tuck 2013
WE 1: Big 4
Posts: 137
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
scott2013
Joined: 10 Mar 2011
Last visit: 21 Jun 2018
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Affiliations: CFA Society of San Francisco (Affiliate Member), American Society for Quality (Enterprise Member)
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 630 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 650 Q39 V40
WE:Supply Chain Management (Aerospace and Defense)
GMAT 2: 650 Q39 V40
Posts: 21
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bakfed
Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Last visit: 12 Oct 2022
Posts: 1,768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 37
Status:Darden Class of 2013
Schools:University of Virginia
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V37
Posts: 1,768
Kudos: 1,246
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
scott2013
I talked to both UCLA and USC today. The answer was NO. I can only apply to one program a year. I applied already this year, FT, and was dinged by both schools. I did get some great feedback on my application from UCLA. So thanks UCLA admissions office! Getting my GMAT up (630, Q39, V38), is the goal going forward. I also received advice to discuss my low UG GPA in the optional essay. I didn't want to draw attention to it, because I have a high M.S. GPA. This seemed to be the first thing that stood out, and somehow my M.S. scores were overlooked.

Most importantly I heard that UCLA has a fairly strict school 3.0 GPA UG policy, and below that requires some administrative hoops to jump through.

Even if somehow I got my GMAT to say 690+, there is no way to know if I'd get in to either UCLA or USC. I am 32, and waiting after two rejections to apply part-time sounds silly. My gut tells me to apply to part-time program next admissions cycle, because my current GMAT should be good enough for USC (i hope, as it is above their average), and has a higher acceptance rate. However, I am trying to change careers, Engineering to Investment Mgmt and feel the full-time is the best way to go. I know that the UG GPA for the part-time programs are lower, but I still need to find out about the 3.0 policy for those programs.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Scott

The truth of the matter is that masters GPA are greatly inflated as opposed to the undergrad GPA. Knowing this, AdComs pay much more attention to the undergrad GPA than to the grad GPA. That's why the UCLA adcoms said what they said about GPA.

I've never heard of the 3.0 "cutoff" mark. As far as I know, people get into b-schools with sub-3 GPAs just fine. One thing that is quite intriguing is the super high average GPA that UCLA Anderson admits. I think with that in mind, it's safe to say that for UCLA and UCLA alone, if you have a sub-3 GPA, you might want to do everything you can to supplement the lower GPA (i.e. high GMAT score, good work experience, good letters, and good essays). USC is much more lenient on the numbers and will be more feasible for those who are looking to stay in LA for the MBA program. I just have never heard of the 3.0 policy in my lifetime.
User avatar
dc3828102
Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Last visit: 14 Sep 2021
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 198
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
scott2013
I talked to both UCLA and USC today. The answer was NO. I can only apply to one program a year. I applied already this year, FT, and was dinged by both schools. I did get some great feedback on my application from UCLA. So thanks UCLA admissions office! Getting my GMAT up (630, Q39, V38), is the goal going forward. I also received advice to discuss my low UG GPA in the optional essay. I didn't want to draw attention to it, because I have a high M.S. GPA. This seemed to be the first thing that stood out, and somehow my M.S. scores were overlooked.

Most importantly I heard that UCLA has a fairly strict school 3.0 GPA UG policy, and below that requires some administrative hoops to jump through.

Even if somehow I got my GMAT to say 690+, there is no way to know if I'd get in to either UCLA or USC. I am 32, and waiting after two rejections to apply part-time sounds silly. My gut tells me to apply to part-time program next admissions cycle, because my current GMAT should be good enough for USC (i hope, as it is above their average), and has a higher acceptance rate. However, I am trying to change careers, Engineering to Investment Mgmt and feel the full-time is the best way to go. I know that the UG GPA for the part-time programs are lower, but I still need to find out about the 3.0 policy for those programs.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Scott

I've been told by somebody from UCLA that I don't even really need to submit my official transcript from my Masters.

That probably means that any education beyond your Bachelors is considered but not as heavily weighted.