It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 23:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Chemical-company employee: A conservation group's study of the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
D
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 238 [1], given: 97

Location: United States (MA)
Reviews Badge
Chemical-company employee: A conservation group's study of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2017, 07:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (01:30) correct 31% (01:43) wrong based on 147 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Chemical-company employee: A conservation group's study of the pollutants released into the environment by 30 small chemical companies reveals that our company and four other companies together account for 60 percent of the total. Clearly, our company releases more pollutants than most chemical companies similar to us in size.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by tbe employee's argument?

(A) The conservation group that produced the study is not hostile to the chemical industry.
(B) The employee's company does not produce chemicals whose processing naturally produces more pollutants than the chemicals produced by other small chemical companies.
(C) The total pollution produced by all small chemical companies combined is not greatly outweighed by that produced by large chemical companies.
(D) The four other companies mentioned by the employee do not together account for very close to 60 percent of the total pollution by the 30 companies.
(E) There is no significant variation in the quantities of pollutants released by the other 25 small chemical companies.

Source: LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos is the best way to say "Thank you!"

Kudos [?]: 238 [1], given: 97

Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1292

Kudos [?]: 1097 [0], given: 62

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Chemical-company employee: A conservation group's study of the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2017, 07:04
Masshole wrote:
Chemical-company employee: A conservation group's study of the pollutants released into the environment by 30 small chemical companies reveals that our company and four other companies together account for 60 percent of the total. Clearly, our company releases more pollutants than most chemical companies similar to us in size.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by tbe employee's argument?


(A) The conservation group that produced the study is not hostile to the chemical industry.
This choice is irrelevant

(B) The employee's company does not produce chemicals whose processing naturally produces more pollutants than the chemicals produced by other small chemical companies.
This choice could be tricky. We care about the pollutant only. Those chemicals that produce more pollutants are irrelevant.

(C) The total pollution produced by all small chemical companies combined is not greatly outweighed by that produced by large chemical companies.
We don't care about large chemical companies. We care about small chemical companies only.

(D) The four other companies mentioned by the employee do not together account for very close to 60 percent of the total pollution by the 30 companies.
This wordy choice is actually correct. It just tries to say that four other companies don't account for 60% of the total pollution. If those companies account for nearly 60%, the employee's company will account for nearly 0%. Thus, the argument is weakened.

(E) There is no significant variation in the quantities of pollutants released by the other 25 small chemical companies.
We care about the employee's company only. Don't care about 25 other companies.
_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

Kudos [?]: 1097 [0], given: 62

Re: Chemical-company employee: A conservation group's study of the   [#permalink] 06 Sep 2017, 07:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Chemical-company employee: A conservation group's study of the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.