It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 22:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 2

Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2009, 06:43
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

45% (01:32) correct 55% (01:10) wrong based on 42 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

A. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
B. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
C. Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.
D. Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
E. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.

Very tough Q IMO - please justify response

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 296

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 37

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2009, 09:22
I think its E.

A. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
"having been won over" modifies mid-20th century instead of Andres Segovia
B. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
not parallel - was prestigious to nor played often , i think it should be "was often played"
C. Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.
too wordy and awkward - instrument's erlative obscurity
D. Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
nor without neither
E. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.
when correctly refers to a time and he is correctly referring to Andres Segovia

what is the OA?
_________________

Thanks, Sri
-------------------------------
keep uppp...ing the tempo...

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 37

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2009
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2009, 09:33
My ans is B

'was neither prestigious nor was often' was is repeated and making it awkward

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 5

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2009, 15:13
[C] for me.

[A] and [B] use the modifier "having been won over" incorrectly implying that classical guitars were won over ..
[D] suffers from parallelism issues.

Definitely a tough one though ..

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 5

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 415

Kudos [?]: 348 [0], given: 20

Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2009, 16:31
A and B both have an issue with the second clause because they “having” does not specifically reference Andres Segovia. “having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.” Is also slightly wrong in that the relative obscurity is referencing the instrument’s sound but the intended meaning is the instrument itself.
D does not follow the idiom of “neither..nor”

Comes down to C and E. There are two major differences.
The first is E uses neither nor which may be preferable to C.
The second is the ending. I think E uses “when” which directly references the time period that the clause is modifying which is more correct.

I would go with E.

Kudos [?]: 348 [0], given: 20

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 May 2009
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 3

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2009, 19:27
E is the best option.....
Correct usage of neither - nor, no pronoun ambiguity and when correctly refers to a time period....

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 3

Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 2

Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2009, 08:24
OA is C

This choice corrects the "nor" issue as well as the modifier issue. Now it is clear that it was Segovia who was won over by the instrument's sound.

As for most common choice (and mine!) E

(E) This choice is incorrect because it repeats "was" after "nor" and because it implies that Segovia was won over by the sound of the instrument in the mid-twentieth century, while the original sentence makes clear that this happened at some earlier point.

Kudos [?]: 283 [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Oct 2009, 08:30
C for me

The rest violates a parallel rule

For E, was Adjective nor Verb ... This choice is certainly violating the parallel rule.

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 228

Kudos [?]: 294 [0], given: 25

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2009, 00:16
People are right when they point out the 'was' after nor which signifies incorrect idiomatic usage of neither nor
Therefore E gets eliminated as well.

C is the winner

Kudos [?]: 294 [0], given: 25

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 276

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 2

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2009, 23:30
can someone please provide an explanation to this question?

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 2

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1635

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2011, 09:46
I don't agree with C.

It changes the meaning of the sentence. It mentions the sound, but sound of what? It's not clear that irt refers to the guitar's sound.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1105 [0], given: 109

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: I am Midnight's Child !
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
Posts: 140

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 11

WE 1: Software Design and Development
Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2011, 09:55
C looks to be the best choice . E would have been the best choice if 'was' didn't follow nor.
_________________

Argument : If you love long trips, you love the GMAT.
Conclusion : GMAT is long journey.

What does the author assume ?
Assumption : A long journey is a long trip.


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 11

Re: Wed Q2 - Guitar   [#permalink] 06 Apr 2011, 09:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.