Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 06:09 It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 06:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
yc168
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,132
Own Kudos:
1,122
 [4]
Given Kudos: 855
Products:
Posts: 1,132
Kudos: 1,122
 [4]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,831
Own Kudos:
14,386
 [2]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,831
Kudos: 14,386
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Shrutika02
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Status:studying
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 80%
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AbhishekP220108
User avatar
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2024
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 705
Own Kudos:
817
 [1]
Given Kudos: 207
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
GMAT Focus 2: 595 Q84 V78 DI77
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 595 Q84 V78 DI77
Posts: 705
Kudos: 817
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Shrutika02 yes the assumption has to be new information and has to be MUST be true revolving around the key elements of argument, since the option C is in line with the argument, but nowhere it was mentioned new level is sufficient or insufficient


Shrutika02
Hi, small doubt. I got the reason behind C but I also feel that option C is in lines which the already mentioned data. Since assumption is supposed to be new information, I am a bit confused as to how can this be an assumption?
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,291
Own Kudos:
33,901
 [1]
Given Kudos: 716
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,291
Kudos: 33,901
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Shrutika02,

Great instinct to ask this, because it gets at what an assumption actually is in CR.

You're right that the argument already tells us prices will go up. But look closely at what it does not tell us: it never says whether the workers' higher wages keep up with those higher prices. That comparison is simply missing from the stimulus - and that's exactly the gap C fills.

Why C isn't a restatement. The premises give you two separate facts:
- The minimum wage goes up (so low-income workers earn more).
- Businesses raise prices on goods those workers buy.

Notice the argument never connects these two. To conclude workers are hurt, the columnist needs the price hit to outweigh the wage gain. The stimulus never says that - so it must be assumed. That's C.

An assumption is an unstated link, not random new info. It doesn't have to be a brand-new topic dropped from the sky. It's the missing piece that has to be true for the premises to actually lead to the conclusion. C is "in line with" the argument precisely because a good assumption sits snugly between the evidence and the conclusion - it just happens to be the part left unsaid.

The negation test makes this concrete. Flip C: suppose the raise does wholly compensate workers for the higher prices. Then workers come out even or ahead - and the columnist's "this hurts them" conclusion collapses. Because negating C destroys the argument, C is a necessary assumption, not a repeat of given data.

Quick everyday parallel to feel it:

"My rent went up this year, so I'm worse off."

What's unstated? That my raise didn't cover the rent increase. If it did, I'm fine. The speaker is silently assuming the raise falls short - same move the columnist is making. That hidden comparison is the assumption.

Answer: C

Shrutika02
Hi, small doubt. I got the reason behind C but I also feel that option C is in lines which the already mentioned data. Since assumption is supposed to be new information, I am a bit confused as to how can this be an assumption?
User avatar
ohhno
Joined: 17 Aug 2026
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Statistics
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V79 DI79
GPA: 8.3
WE:Education (Finance: Venture Capital)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V79 DI79
Posts: 35
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A)
Talks about workers earning more than minimum wage. The argument is specifically about low-income workers.
(B)
Talks about a smaller increase than the proposed one. That's irrelevant.
(C)
Directly connects the two effects:
  • Higher wages
  • Higher prices
If higher wages completely offset higher prices, workers wouldn't be hurt.
(D)
Whether helping workers is a good reason to raise the minimum wage is a value judgment. It doesn't support the economic argument.
(E)
Makes a broad claim about the economy, while the columnist's argument is specifically about low-income workers and prices.

yc168
Columnist: Raising the minimum wage to the level recently proposed will actually hurt, rather than help, workers with low incomes. As the minimum wage increases, businesses must compensate for higher wage costs by increasing prices for the goods and services that low-income workers must buy but can already barely afford.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the columnist’s argument depends?

(A) Workers who earn more than the minimum wage would not also be hurt by increased prices for goods and services.

(B) Any increase to the minimum wage smaller than the one proposed would not substantially affect prices of goods and services.

(C) The proposed minimum-wage increase would not wholly compensate low-income workers for the resulting increase in prices for goods and services.

(D) If raising the minimum wage helped low-income workers, this would be a good reason for raising it.

(E) Changes in the minimum wage are generally not as beneficial to the economy as is commonly believed.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts