It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 12:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 684

Kudos [?]: 629 [1], given: 0

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 01:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:13) correct 47% (01:15) wrong based on 957 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 629 [1], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2945

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 210

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 05:02
B for me. Will explain if this is the OA.

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 210

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 209

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 10:04
E is the only one that makes sense to me. They are ruling out all factors that there can be anyway to increase funds. I have no idea though.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 6

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2008, 10:45
B for me

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 209

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2008, 13:18
OA prassanar?

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 97

Kudos [?]: 12 [1], given: 0

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2008, 18:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
I say B.
_________________

MBA Blog: University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management- http://unconventionalapplicant.blogspot.com/

Kudos [?]: 12 [1], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1473 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2008, 21:10
jingy77 wrote:
E is the only one that makes sense to me. They are ruling out all factors that there can be anyway to increase funds. I have no idea though.


Agree with you, E

Because the argument "E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds", "This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed". We do not must find the flaw of the argument.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1473 [0], given: 1

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1431

Kudos [?]: 389 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2008, 21:17
i'm with the B gang

Kudos [?]: 389 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2008, 21:18
E

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2945

Kudos [?]: 678 [1], given: 210

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2008, 21:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
hahah showdown time B vs E ... cmon prasanna we need the OA.

Kudos [?]: 678 [1], given: 210

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 12

Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2008, 07:36
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
im joining th B gang

The problem or flaw with the argument is that he is saying

We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

So he is ruling out every other option. Why though? What in the argument states that another plan couldn't work either? Why is his plan the only one to solve the problem?
What if there were other ways to reduce expenditures in another plan?

Therefore in B, he is confusing what could be an adequate solution to a required solution (ONLY is key here)

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 12

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2008, 08:33
OA is B - found on another thread.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2009
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 1

Schools: Haas, Darden, Booth, LBS, Insead and IMD
Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2009, 04:30
1
This post received
KUDOS
terp26 wrote:
im joining th B gang

The problem or flaw with the argument is that he is saying

We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

So he is ruling out every other option. Why though? What in the argument states that another plan couldn't work either? Why is his plan the only one to solve the problem?
What if there were other ways to reduce expenditures in another plan?

Therefore in B, he is confusing what could be an adequate solution to a required solution (ONLY is key here)



Sound reasoning. I used the same.

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 1

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 587

Kudos [?]: 477 [0], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2010, 04:14
good explanation terp

Kudos [?]: 477 [0], given: 412

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2010
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 2

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2010, 05:50
prasannar wrote:
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.
This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument
(A) relies on information that is far from certain
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

Confusing. I would still go with E.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 2

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 4

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2010, 07:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
Is this really how this passage is written in the OG? Terrible! I had to read it multiple times to figure out what was being said and who was being addressed. I can't think rule of a grammar rule that allows you to place the speaker in front of a passage with a colon and then followup it up with a string of dialogue that does not have quotations or indicators of who the speaker is addressing; except maybe in a script.

that aside, I picked B

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 4

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 8

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Mar 2010, 11:29
prasannar wrote:
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B



I will go with B

it is the only option which talks about the solution .........whether adequate or required
_________________

Success is my Destiny

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 8

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 216

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 1

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jul 2010, 08:06
what is wrong with E>?

Kudos [?]: 244 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 154

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2010, 04:57
I still feel its E
_________________


R E S P E C T


Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

4 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1438

Kudos [?]: 226 [4], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Re: CR 30: Commisioner [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2010, 07:36
4
This post received
KUDOS
E is something which is explicitly stated in the passage - the commissioner says there is no way to increase available funds. The question asks us to find a flaw in this reasoning. If we choose E - we are simply restating the commissoner's argument. B points the flaw by highlighting where the problem is.

Kudos [?]: 226 [4], given: 13

Re: CR 30: Commisioner   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2010, 07:36

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 47 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.