Last visit was: 13 Jul 2025, 23:24 It is currently 13 Jul 2025, 23:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 13 July 2025
Posts: 102,639
Own Kudos:
741,163
 [6]
Given Kudos: 98,178
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,639
Kudos: 741,163
 [6]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,035
Own Kudos:
1,948
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,035
Kudos: 1,948
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,052
Own Kudos:
9,688
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,052
Kudos: 9,688
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
OC2910
Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Last visit: 09 Feb 2023
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 269
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.59
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V31
Posts: 230
Kudos: 139
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Congressman Jones experienced a drop in his approval numbers after announcing that taxes in his district would increase the following year. His office also received a significant number of phone calls decrying this tax raise. Nevertheless, he claims that reactions to the tax increase were unrelated to his drop in voters' approval of him.

Type - Strengthen
BID - author says drop in voters not because of his tax increasing plans
Missing info:1)some other reason for drop
2)the two things a not related but coincidental

looking at the answer choices

A. All elected officials in his area experienced similar drops in approval numbers at the same time. : hold On :if all numbers are falling then the events are not related (our missing gap no 2)

B. The citizens who called in to Congressman Jones's office had all voted for him in the previous election. so what :no effect on numbers falling
C. Elected officials are only likely to attribute drops in their approval numbers to policies only when citizens call their offices about these policies. aftermath of the drop is irrelevant we are interested in the cause

D. Congressman Jones previously raised taxes in his district and received a similar number of phone calls.: a previous incident doesnt warrant it will be true this time

E. Most voters in Congressman Jones's district list taxes as their number-one household expense. :so what : we are interested with cause of the drop


only A stands and the correct answer
User avatar
aragonn
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Last visit: 30 Sep 2019
Posts: 1,232
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 416
Products:
Posts: 1,232
Kudos: 5,842
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Official Explanation
Answer = (A).

Two things happened at the same time: the Congressman’s approval numbers dropped and he received phone calls about the tax raise. The Congressman claims that these two things aren’t related—in other words, just because they happened at the same time, it does not mean that one caused the other. To strengthen his argument, we need to find evidence of another cause for at least one of these events. (A) gives us that: if all elected officials experienced a drop in approval numbers, there may have been some kind of a scandal, or simply increasing disillusionment with politicians in the area.

Even if the citizens who called had voted for Congressman Jones (B), this doesn’t provide an alternate explanation for either the sinking approval numbers or the increase in phone calls. If they hadn’t voted for him, that might make more sense, but it still wouldn’t strengthen the Congressman’s position.

(C) claims that politicians WOULD correlate the phone calls and the approval numbers, which Congressman Jones is not doing. Therefore, we can see that this might be a weakener, but it’s definitely not a strengthener.

(D) suggests that there is a connection between raising taxes and the number of phone calls he receives, which would weaken Congressman Jones’s argument. Furthermore, it doesn’t account for the lower approval rating, either.

While it doesn’t sound pleasant to live in Congressman Jones’s district and pay such high taxes (E), this doesn’t make it more likely that the approval numbers and phone calls are unrelated, which is Congressman Jones’s position.
User avatar
dreamknight
Joined: 22 Jun 2020
Last visit: 13 Feb 2024
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Posts: 61
Kudos: 83
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Congressman Jones experienced a drop in his approval numbers after announcing that taxes in his district would increase the following year. His office also received a significant number of phone calls decrying this tax raise. Nevertheless, he claims that reactions to the tax increase were unrelated to his drop in voters' approval of him.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports Congressman Jones's position?

Stated Facts:
1) Drop in approval ratings coincided with the announcement of increase in taxes
2) His office received phone calls decrying tax raise

Congressman Jones's position: The announcement of increase in taxes is not a cause for the drop in approval numbers

Nature of the statement that supports Congressman Jones's position:
1) Gives an alternative cause for the drop in the approval numbers
2) Show that these two things were not co-related


A. All elected officials in his area experienced similar drops in approval numbers at the same time. - Correct
Shows that the two were not co-related and thus support Congressman's position

B. The citizens who called in to Congressman Jones's office had all voted for him in the previous election. - Incorrect
This in fact shows that people who once supported him are not happy with his recent tax raise announcement, this statement actually slightly weakens Congressman's position

C. Elected officials are only likely to attribute drops in their approval numbers to policies only when citizens call their offices about these policies. - Incorrect
This statement states that the elected officials are attributing the drop to the policy and doesn't give an alternate causation

D. Congressman Jones previously raised taxes in his district and received a similar number of phone calls. - Incorrect
This talks about the past and doesn't talk about alternate causation

E. Most voters in Congressman Jones's district list taxes as their number-one household expense. - Incorrect
This actually gives the reason for the resentment among voters and weakens the Congressman's position.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,443
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,443
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts