Project SC Butler: Day 105 Sentence Correction (SC2)
Considered one of the most intelligent of the New World monkeys,
capuchins cleverly create an insecticide and crush millipedes, rubbing the remains of the bugs over
its back.
A)
capuchins cleverly create an insecticide
and crush millipedes, rubbing the remains [
LOGIC]
B)
capuchins cleverly create an insecticide
, they crush millipedes, and with such rub the remains [
comma splice = run on sentence]
C)
capuchins use
their cleverness to create an insecticide, crush millipedes, and rub the remains
D) the capuchin cleverly creates an insecticide
, crushes millipedes, and
it rubs the remains [
LOGIC]
E) the capuchin cleverly creates an insecticide,
crushing millipedes and
rubbing the remains
EXPLANATION• takeaway:
read the non-underlined portion. In this case,
its tells us that "capuchin" is singular.
• pronoun ambiguity? No. The guideline is that there can be only one logical antecedent for a pronoun. There is only one logical antecedent. See analysis beneath (A).
• Split # 1: Capuchins (plural) vs. capuchin (singular)When we see a split such as
capuchins and
the capuchin, a split that is fairly common
on the GMAT, we need to find the clue in the non-underlined portion of the sentence.
Almost always in these species / animal questions, GMAC will tell us whether the noun in question is plural or singular. (I cannot recall any exception.)
This question tells us that the noun is singular, that "the capuchin" is correct.
The word
ITS in the non-underlined portion of the sentence is a
singular pronoun (possessive).
The pronoun is logical.
This animal needs an insecticide, which prevents bugs from biting.
Singular ITS?
Well,
its cannot refer to
bugs, millipedes, or
remains. Those three words are plural.
Logically,
its cannot refer to
insecticide.
--
Insecticide is not an animal with a back.
ITS needs a singular antecedent.
ITS has one logical antecedent: the capuchin
Answers A, B, and C use the plural word
capuchins, which does not agree with the singular pronoun ITS
Eliminate A, B, and C
Option A is also illogical. Sequence is off. The error is similar to that in Option D, analyzed below.
• Split #2: ParallelismOption (D) introduces the word IT
The capuchin ... creates an insecticide, crushes millipedes, and
IT rubs ...
The capuchin does three things in a list
X, Y, and Z.
X, Y, and Z must be parallel. Using IT before the Z element ("it rubs") ruins the parallelism.
The word IT also can create confusion: Why do the first two verbs clearly belong with the subject
capuchin whereas this third verb is attached to an IT?
The lack of parallelism is enough to eliminate D.
The logic of D is off, too. (Option A, already eliminated, has the same error.)
Creates, crushes, and
rubs are not all at the same logical "level." The sequence is off.
That is, the capuchin creates an insecticide [
BY crushING millipedes] and rubs the remains (the insecticide) over its own back.
Eliminate D.
I have noted other errors in the options in red typeface,
errors that if not explained here have an explanation in brackets.
The correct answer is E.Biggest takeaway: Almost invariably, GMAC will tell us whether a noun used in this kind of question is singular or plural. Remember to look for the clue in non-underlined portions of the sentence.
COMMENTSThe answer split in this question is pretty straightforward.
If you catch ITS in the final portion of the sentence, life is a lot easier.
I laughed at this comment about B from
PeepalTree :
ehhh this option is a messTrue.
PeepalTree wrote an excellent answer. Best answer. Kudos!