Hi SKP220292,Your reading of the argument is spot on. The author
does use quality (lost/delayed letters) as the tool to attack the "letters delivered per worker" metric. The slip is in how you're reading the
question stem, not the argument.
Read the stem literally"The objection... is based on doubts about the truth of which statement?" This is asking for a statement that the author
believes is false - a statement whose
negation is the assumption powering the objection. It is
not asking which statement the author doubts the
validity/importance of. So the correct choice is something the author thinks is
untrue.
Now run that test on DStatement D says: "The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity." Does the author think this is
true or
false? Clearly
false - the author's whole objection is that you
cannot ignore quality (lost/delayed letters) when measuring productivity. The author
doubts the truth of D. That is exactly what the stem asks for. So picking D does
not mean the author doubts quality matters - it means the author doubts the claim that quality
can be ignored. That lines up perfectly with your own reading.
Why B fails the same testB says: "Delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service." Does the author doubt this is
true? No - the author never disputes that delivering letters is what the postal service is for. The objection isn't "delivery isn't the main job"; it's "counting deliveries alone misses the quality side." So the author has
no doubt about the truth of B, which is exactly why B is wrong.
One word to lock it inMentally swap "doubts about the truth of" for "treats as false." The author treats D as false and B as true. The answer must be the one treated as false - D.
Answer: DSKP220292
"..based on doubts about the truth of the following.."
so the objection is based on X, where X = doubts about truth of Y --> Does truth of Y basically not mean "validity of Y"? If so, wouldn't that mean that the doubt is on whether the following is valid or not? Isn't the stem asking "objection...based on validity of..."?
But the author does not question or doubt the validity or importance of quality of services, in fact he/she does the opposite - he/she uses this factor to cast doubt on the reliability of the metric of "number of letters delivered per worker".
But choosing option D means that the author's objection comes from the author questioning the validity of quality of services, isn't it? Option B on the other hand implies that the author casts doubt on the validity that delivery is the PRIMARY activity (since he/she believes reliability of delivery is as much part of the activity as the delivery itself).