“In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago ab
[#permalink]
03 Jan 2021, 15:22
Topic:
The following appeared in a magazine article on trends and lifestyles: “In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart’s Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960’s, and you will also find a wide selection of cheeses made with high butterfat content. Next door, the owners of the Good Earth Café, an old vegetarian restaurant, are still making a modest living, but the owners ofthe new House of Beef across the street are millionaires.”
My Response:
An excerpt from a magazine article on trends and lifestyles notes how, over the last decade, people have grown less concerned about their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses, citing an array of anecdotal evidence. Namely, the article notes how Heart's Delight, a healthier restaurant, is now offering a selection of fatty cheeses, and how House of Beef is thriving, while Good Earth Cafe is just making a modest profit. Though the author is well-intentioned and attempts to support their argument with relevant evidence, I believe that their argument is insufficient and incomplete.
The author's piece relies on isolated arguments and sweeping generalizations, both of which make the argument flawed. Heart's Delight recent offering of a "wide selection of cheeses made with high butterfat content" is not necessarily indicative of broader industry trends or habits of other organic stores. Likewise, the author's anecdotal observation that House of Beef's owners are millionaires -- while the owners of the Good Earth Cafe are just making a modest living -- not only does not appear to be rooted in fact, but also carries little relevance in explaining people's concern about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. While both of these examples might be true, they do little in explaining what is happening on a broader scale and act as sweeping generalizations.
On a similar note, the author makes a number of connections that are not logically sound. Heart's Delight broader offering of fatty cheeses could be a result of the store attempting to become a more complete one-stop-shop retailer; its carrying, or lack of carrying, of fatty cheeses has little explanatory value in this situation. A counterexample of this can be seen with Whole Foods, which is a national supermarket chain that focuses on offering organic and healthier alternatives. Though Whole Foods has increasingly only offered healthy and natural options, the American public has arguably moved in the opposite direction, as obesity figures have hit record highs; Whole Foods' offering of healthy options has not made the American more concerned about regulating their intake of fatty foods, and I do not believe that it would be unrealistic to say that the opposite is not true either. A similar argument can be made with House of Beef, as the restaurant's recent success could be attributed to people cooking vegetarian foods at home, and instead opting to eat unhealthier foods when dining out.
Lastly, the author fails to consider other factors in their analysis and does not include a baseline for comparison. As mentioned in the paragraph above, though lessening concern about regulating the intake of red meat and fatty cheeses could be the reason why Heart's Delight decide to offer a wide selection of fatty cheeses, there are plenty of other alternative explanations as well. Perhaps, due to declining cheese sales, a local cheese shop recently went out of business and Heart's Delight wanted to seize their market share; alternatively, Heart's Delight could have aspirations to become a more complete grocery store, and given that cheese is a popular food item, it would only make sense for them to carry it. Additionally, without a baseline to compare this decade to, our analysis is incomplete. Only using the author's article, it is unclear whether this selection of cheese was added recently or whether House of Beef's success occurred over the past decade.
To conclude, the author's argument is insufficient and incomplete, as it depends on logical flaws, faulty assumptions, and sweeping generalizations. Though people might be less concerned about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses than a decade ago, the author's argument on why this is the case is unconvincing and poorly reasoned. The argument can be significantly strengthened via the inclusion of data on how people's diets have changed over the past decade, nationwide (instead of localized) evidence, and additional evidence that considers other factors and does not fall victim to the deficiencies described above.